Democrats Will Try to Force a Vote on Immigration Reform. Here’s Why It Matters.

The effort will likely go nowhere procedurally, but lawmakers want to keep the pressure on Republicans.

A boys shows a US flag as President Barack Obama speaks on immigration at the Chamizal National Memorial on May 10, 2011 in El Paso, Texas.
National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izad
March 26, 2014, 2:31 a.m.

Just last month, Cap­it­ol Hill Demo­crats — very pur­pose­fully — gave Re­pub­lic­ans plenty of space to have an in­tern­al dis­cus­sion over im­mig­ra­tion re­form. Not any­more. 

With the pro­spects of passing com­pre­hens­ive re­form this year not look­ing very good, Demo­crats want to kick the pres­sure up a notch on their Re­pub­lic­an coun­ter­parts. Demo­crats will file a dis­charge pe­ti­tion Wed­nes­day in an at­tempt to force a vote on the House ver­sion of the com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form bill that passed the Sen­ate last sum­mer.

That ef­fort will likely go nowhere pro­ced­ur­ally, but ad­voc­ates view the mech­an­ism as a push to Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship and as a chance to get law­makers on the re­cord.

“It’s time for our Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship in the House to give us a vote,” said House Demo­crat­ic Caucus Chair­man Xavi­er Be­cerra. “Stop block­ing a vote, let us have a path to fix our broken im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem.”

House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi’s of­fice on Tues­day high­lighted a new Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice es­tim­ate that the House ver­sion of the com­pre­hens­ive bill that passed the Sen­ate would re­duce the de­fi­cit by $200 bil­lion over 10 years. (That’s no big sur­prise, giv­en that CBO found the Sen­ate bill would also re­duce the de­fi­cit.)

Im­mig­ra­tion act­iv­ists have already taken up ag­gress­ive tac­tics, such as con­front­ing House Speak­er John Boehner dur­ing his break­fast and storm­ing House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor’s Ar­ling­ton, Va., condo. But back when House Re­pub­lic­ans un­veiled their im­mig­ra­tion prin­ciples last month, Demo­crats re­mained tep­id so that Re­pub­lic­ans could try and push im­mig­ra­tion re­form among their own mem­bers. Since then, Re­pub­lic­ans have down­played re­form mov­ing ahead — des­pite Boehner still say­ing it’s im­port­ant that it hap­pen.

Now, Pres­id­ent Obama is reach­ing out to mem­bers of Con­gress and act­iv­ists who have been call­ing on his ad­min­is­tra­tion to curb de­port­a­tions. Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son met with Demo­crat­ic Rep. Lu­is Gu­ti­er­rez for the first time Tues­day. While po­ten­tial changes to de­port­a­tion en­force­ment were not dis­cussed, John­son has been dir­ec­ted to re­view his agency’s ap­proach.

“It is clear to me they are pre­par­ing for the worst-case scen­ario if the Re­pub­lic­ans don’t act,” Gu­ti­er­rez said.

This dis­charge pe­ti­tion stands little chance of ac­tu­ally for­cing a vote. Even the Re­pub­lic­ans who have signed on as co­spon­sors of the com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion bill aren’t en­dors­ing it. Rep. Ileana Ros-Le­htin­en of Flor­ida, one of just three Re­pub­lic­ans who have ac­tu­ally signed onto the House im­mig­ra­tion bill, says she won’t be sign­ing the dis­charge pe­ti­tion as a mat­ter of prin­ciple. But she’s not speak­ing out against the ef­fort, either.

“I don’t blame them for us­ing it. I think it’s good, a power­ful tool,” she said. “For every is­sue, you use every vehicle avail­able to you.”

Demo­crats are call­ing on the pub­lic to sup­port the dis­charge pe­ti­tion, and out­side or­gan­iz­a­tions will be util­iz­ing it in their ad­vocacy.

“That’s much bet­ter from an or­gan­iz­ing per­spect­ive,” Jeff Haus­er of the AFL-CIO said of sign­ing the pe­ti­tion. “Those work­ing with im­mig­rant com­munit­ies, it al­lows us to know who are our friends and who are our en­emies.”

What We're Following See More »
Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
7 hours ago
White House Weighs in Against Non-Compete Contracts
8 hours ago

"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
9 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

Clinton Super PAC Enters the House Fray
13 hours ago

Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.

House to Vote on Iran Sanctions Renewal in Lame Duck
13 hours ago

Republican House leaders are planning on taking up a vote to renew the Iran Sanctions Act as soon as the lame-duck session begins in mid-November. The law, which expires on Dec. 31, permits a host of sanctions against Iran's industries, defense, and government. The renewal will likely pass the House, but its status is unclear once it reaches the Senate, and a spokesman from the White House refused to say whether President Obama would sign it into law.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.