Republican FEC Commissioners Go Public With Complaints About Mystery Redaction

The GOP commissioners still can’t unlock a document that could guide political lawyers counseling campaign clients on how to avoid sanctions.

National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
Shane Goldmacher
March 26, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers of the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion have broken their si­lence about the mys­ter­i­ous 76-page doc­u­ment that was re­dac­ted against their wishes in the dead­locked de­cision over wheth­er Cross­roads GPS was a le­git­im­ate non­profit.

In a state­ment pos­ted to the FEC’s web­site late Tues­day, the com­mis­sion’s three Re­pub­lic­ans pulled back the cur­tain a bit on the miss­ing doc­u­ment. “We do not be­lieve that these re­dac­tions are ne­ces­sary,” they wrote, say­ing they had sought to re­lease the doc­u­ments in a closed-door com­mis­sion meet­ing but “the vote failed.”

Na­tion­al Journ­al first re­por­ted the ex­ist­ence of the massive re­dac­tion and the be­hind-the-scenes con­tro­versy earli­er this month.

The sealed doc­u­ment is the ini­tial re­port from the FEC’s law­yers to the com­mis­sion, from 2011, re­com­mend­ing how to pro­ceed in the Cross­roads case, one of the most con­sequen­tial be­fore the FEC in years. That ini­tial re­port was with­drawn and re­placed with a new one from the coun­sel’s of­fice a year later. When the Re­pub­lic­ans sought to pub­lish the first re­port, along with their opin­ion in the case, it was blocked first by the Of­fice of Gen­er­al Coun­sel and later by the FEC’s Demo­crat­ic-aligned com­mis­sion­ers.

In their state­ment Tues­day even­ing, the com­mis­sion’s Re­pub­lic­ans — Lee Good­man, Car­oline Hunter, and Mat­thew Peterson — wrote that the doc­u­ment “was clearly pre­pared with an ex­pect­a­tion that it would be re­viewed by com­mis­sion­ers and the gen­er­al pub­lic.”

The con­tents of the re­dac­ted pages are im­port­ant as they could serve as a roadmap for polit­ic­al law­yers for how the FEC made its de­cision and help them provide guid­ance to polit­ic­al groups for how to avoid fu­ture sanc­tions.

“It should have been pub­licly re­leased so that it could be avail­able to a re­view­ing court and lit­ig­ants as part of the ad­min­is­trat­ive re­cord in this mat­ter,” the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers wrote. In their state­ment, the Re­pub­lic­ans said that the re­dac­ted pages in­clude both the law­yers’ first re­port, “along with an ac­com­pa­ny­ing Fac­tu­al and Leg­al Ana­lys­is.”

They also dis­cussed, in great­er de­tail, the dif­fer­ences between the ini­tial sealed re­port and fi­nal pub­lished one. The GOP com­mis­sion­ers said the fi­nal re­port used “a cal­en­dar year and only a cal­en­dar year” to de­term­ine wheth­er a group was a le­git­im­ate non­profit but that the Of­fice of Gen­er­al Coun­sel’s leg­al test “was evolving be­hind closed doors,” sug­gest­ing the ini­tial re­port looked at a dif­fer­ent time frame.

The Re­pub­lic­ans wrote that Cross­roads, a Karl Rove-af­fil­i­ated group, and oth­er groups “did not have clear pri­or no­tice that their re­spect­ive ma­jor pur­poses would be ana­lyzed by OGC un­der a single cal­en­dar-year rule.”

It is pos­sible the re­dac­ted doc­u­ments could still be made pub­lic, after sev­er­al groups have sued the FEC for its dead­lock in the case and could re­quest them as part of the law­suit.

What We're Following See More »
Cruz: Eight Justices Could Be an Ongoing Situation
1 hours ago

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”

Chaffetz Also Caves, Says He’ll Vote Trump
3 hours ago
DNC Sues RNC Over Trump’s Rigged Vote Comments
3 hours ago

The Democratic National Committee sued the Republican National Committee in U.S. District Court in New Jersey for aiding GOP nominee Donald Trump as he argues that the presidential election is "rigged." The DNC claims "that Trump's argument is designed to suppress the vote in minority communities."

Clinton Foundation Staffers Steered Biz to Bill
11 hours ago

"Two chief fundraisers for the Clinton Foundation pressed corporate donors to steer business opportunities to former President Bill Clinton as well, according to a hacked memo published Wednesday by WikiLeaks. The November 2011 memo from Douglas Band, at the time a top aide to Mr. Clinton, outlines extensive fundraising efforts that Mr. Band and a partner deployed on behalf of the Clinton Foundation and how that work sometimes translated into large speaking fees and other paid work for Mr. Clinton."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
20 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.