Republican FEC Commissioners Go Public With Complaints About Mystery Redaction

The GOP commissioners still can’t unlock a document that could guide political lawyers counseling campaign clients on how to avoid sanctions.

National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
Shane Goldmacher
March 26, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers of the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion have broken their si­lence about the mys­ter­i­ous 76-page doc­u­ment that was re­dac­ted against their wishes in the dead­locked de­cision over wheth­er Cross­roads GPS was a le­git­im­ate non­profit.

In a state­ment pos­ted to the FEC’s web­site late Tues­day, the com­mis­sion’s three Re­pub­lic­ans pulled back the cur­tain a bit on the miss­ing doc­u­ment. “We do not be­lieve that these re­dac­tions are ne­ces­sary,” they wrote, say­ing they had sought to re­lease the doc­u­ments in a closed-door com­mis­sion meet­ing but “the vote failed.”

Na­tion­al Journ­al first re­por­ted the ex­ist­ence of the massive re­dac­tion and the be­hind-the-scenes con­tro­versy earli­er this month.

The sealed doc­u­ment is the ini­tial re­port from the FEC’s law­yers to the com­mis­sion, from 2011, re­com­mend­ing how to pro­ceed in the Cross­roads case, one of the most con­sequen­tial be­fore the FEC in years. That ini­tial re­port was with­drawn and re­placed with a new one from the coun­sel’s of­fice a year later. When the Re­pub­lic­ans sought to pub­lish the first re­port, along with their opin­ion in the case, it was blocked first by the Of­fice of Gen­er­al Coun­sel and later by the FEC’s Demo­crat­ic-aligned com­mis­sion­ers.

In their state­ment Tues­day even­ing, the com­mis­sion’s Re­pub­lic­ans — Lee Good­man, Car­oline Hunter, and Mat­thew Peterson — wrote that the doc­u­ment “was clearly pre­pared with an ex­pect­a­tion that it would be re­viewed by com­mis­sion­ers and the gen­er­al pub­lic.”

The con­tents of the re­dac­ted pages are im­port­ant as they could serve as a roadmap for polit­ic­al law­yers for how the FEC made its de­cision and help them provide guid­ance to polit­ic­al groups for how to avoid fu­ture sanc­tions.

“It should have been pub­licly re­leased so that it could be avail­able to a re­view­ing court and lit­ig­ants as part of the ad­min­is­trat­ive re­cord in this mat­ter,” the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers wrote. In their state­ment, the Re­pub­lic­ans said that the re­dac­ted pages in­clude both the law­yers’ first re­port, “along with an ac­com­pa­ny­ing Fac­tu­al and Leg­al Ana­lys­is.”

They also dis­cussed, in great­er de­tail, the dif­fer­ences between the ini­tial sealed re­port and fi­nal pub­lished one. The GOP com­mis­sion­ers said the fi­nal re­port used “a cal­en­dar year and only a cal­en­dar year” to de­term­ine wheth­er a group was a le­git­im­ate non­profit but that the Of­fice of Gen­er­al Coun­sel’s leg­al test “was evolving be­hind closed doors,” sug­gest­ing the ini­tial re­port looked at a dif­fer­ent time frame.

The Re­pub­lic­ans wrote that Cross­roads, a Karl Rove-af­fil­i­ated group, and oth­er groups “did not have clear pri­or no­tice that their re­spect­ive ma­jor pur­poses would be ana­lyzed by OGC un­der a single cal­en­dar-year rule.”

It is pos­sible the re­dac­ted doc­u­ments could still be made pub­lic, after sev­er­al groups have sued the FEC for its dead­lock in the case and could re­quest them as part of the law­suit.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
18 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
21 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
22 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login