Obama to Russia and E.U.: ‘This Is Not Another Cold War That We’re Entering Into’

But the president did spend much of his major speech hitting back at Putin.

President Obama delivers a speech at the Palais des Beaux-Arts (Palace of Fine Arts - BOZAR) in Brussels on March 26, 2014.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
March 26, 2014, 10:25 a.m.

In a Wed­nes­day speech at the European Uni­on sum­mit in Brus­sels, Pres­id­ent Obama strongly re­af­firmed his com­mit­ment to Ukraine and re­peated his warn­ing to Rus­sia to push no farther in­to the coun­try. The U.S., Europe, and its part­ners “have isol­ated Rus­sia polit­ic­ally,” the pres­id­ent said, and “are im­pos­ing costs through sanc­tions that have left a mark on Rus­sia and those ac­count­able for its ac­tions.”

If Vladi­mir Putin and Rus­sia stay on their course, Obama said, “we will en­sure that this isol­a­tion deep­ens.”

At the same time, the pres­id­ent at­temp­ted to push back against the nar­rat­ive that the Crimea con­flict has brought U.S. and Rus­si­an re­la­tions back to the 20th cen­tury.

“This is not an­oth­er Cold War that we’re en­ter­ing in­to,” Obama said. “After all, un­like the So­viet Uni­on, Rus­sia leads no bloc of na­tions. No glob­al ideo­logy. The United States and NATO do not seek any con­flict with Rus­sia.”

Obama also kicked back at sev­er­al of Putin’s stated reas­ons for an­nex­ing Crimea. For starters, “there is no evid­ence, nev­er has been, of sys­tem­ic vi­ol­ence against eth­nic Rus­si­ans in­side of Ukraine,” Obama said. Rus­sia is not act­ing like the West did in Kosovo, as Putin has claimed. NATO only in­ter­vened in Kosovo after the coun­try’s people “were sys­tem­at­ic­ally killed and bru­tal­ized for years,” Obama said.

And Amer­ica’s in­vove­ment in Ir­aq isn’t a pre­ced­ent for Rus­si­an ac­tion, either. “We did not claim or an­nex Ir­aq’s ter­rit­ory,” Obama said. “We did not grab its re­sources for our own gain.” Obama did not, however, launch in­to a staunch de­fense of the U.S.’s war in Ir­aq, say­ing in­stead that Amer­ica and Europe don’t “claim to be the sole ar­bit­er of what is right and wrong in the world,” but that “part of what makes us dif­fer­ent is that we wel­come cri­ti­cism.”

Obama also called it “ab­surd” for Putin or oth­ers to sug­gest that “Amer­ica is some­how con­spir­ing with fas­cists out­side of Ukraine or fail­ing to re­spect the Rus­si­an people.” Just be­cause Rus­sia and Ukraine share a close his­tory “does not mean [Rus­sia] should be able to dic­tate Ukraine’s fu­ture.”

But the pres­id­ent wasn’t just speak­ing to Putin in his ad­dress. “I know it may seem easy to see these events as re­moved from our lives … dis­tant from con­cerns closer to home,” he said. “There will al­ways be voices who say that what hap­pens in the wider world is not our con­cern, nor our re­spons­ib­il­ity.” He con­tin­ued:

But we must nev­er for­get that we are heirs to a struggle for free­dom. Our demo­cracy, our in­di­vidu­al op­por­tun­ity only ex­ists be­cause those who came be­fore us had the wis­dom and the cour­age to re­cog­nize that ideals will only en­dure if we see our self-in­terest in the suc­cess of oth­er peoples and oth­er na­tions. Now is not the time to bluster. The situ­ation in Ukraine, like crises in many parts of the world, does not have easy an­swers. Nor a mil­it­ary solu­tion. But at this mo­ment, we must meet the chal­lenge to our ideas, to our very in­ter­na­tion­al or­der with strength and con­vic­tion.

Obama’s not talk­ing about a fic­tion­al group of un­con­cerned Amer­ic­ans here. Re­cent polling shows that a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans don’t think the U.S. should get “too in­volved” in Ukraine, with only 29 per­cent of re­spond­ents say­ing the U.S. should take a “firm stand” against Rus­sia.

It won’t be so easy to change a slew of minds on this. But, at least ac­cord­ing to Obama, the crisis in Ukraine poses a vi­tal ques­tion worth an­swer­ing.

What kind of Europe, what kind of Amer­ica, what kind of world will we leave be­hind? And I be­lieve that if we hold firm to our prin­ciples and are will­ing to back our be­liefs with cour­age and re­solve, then hope will ul­ti­mately over­come fear, and free­dom will con­tin­ue to tri­umph over tyranny. Be­cause that is what forever stirs in the hu­man heart.

What We're Following See More »
Bill Murray Crashes White House Briefing Room
7 hours ago

In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.

CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
10 hours ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
10 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
11 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
11 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.