Astronomers have discovered a possible new dwarf planet: a cold, relatively tiny lump of ice traveling near the barrier where the sun loses all its gravitational influence.
The planet — 280 miles in diameter — is roughly the size of Wisconsin. And despite the planet’s relative smallness, this discovery has ignited astronomers’ excitement: Its existence and orbit may be able to tell us about the origins of the solar system.
But never mind all that. More importantly, the scientists gave the planet a nickname, and that name is “Biden.”
“The newfound object’s official name is 2012 VP113, but the discovery team calls it VP for short, or just ‘Biden,’ ” the journal Nature, which published the findings, reports.
Then this happened (click the photo):
It will be some time before the dwarf planet gets an official name. The International Astronomical Union needs iron-clad evidence that the celestial body does in fact exist and adheres to the definition of a dwarf planet.
But when it comes down to deciding, the planet’s name will not be Biden.
It won’t be for any fault in the vice president. Rather, according to the IAU, “names for persons or events known primarily for their military or political activities are acceptable only after 100 years elapsed since the person died or the event occurred.”
So there will be no Dwarf Planet Biden, Bush, Clinton, or Obama until the next century.
The IAU’s other planet-naming rules are wonderfully nerdy, and worth reading through. Those who find the planet are allowed to suggest a name, but the names are officially selected by a 15-judge committee.
Generally, the heavens employ a Roman theme. But in some circumstances, the rules are highly specific. For example (emphasis mine):
“¢ “Objects in orbits between the orbits of Jupiter and Neptune, and not in 1:1 resonance with any major planet, are to receive names of centaurs.”
“¢ “Objects in orbits in 3:2 resonance with Neptune are to receive names of underworld deities.”
“¢ “Names of pet animals are discouraged.”
“¢ “Names of a purely or principally commercial nature are not allowed.”
So no planet Verizon, either.
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.