Senators Eviscerate ‘Delusional’ Administration for Having No Strategy in Syria

Syrian rebels fighting pro-regime forces gather along a road in Syria's eastern town of Deir Ezzor, on August 17, 2013. Al-Qaeda loyalists attacked a mainly Kurdish town in northeastern Syria sparking fighting in which 17 people were killed, two of them ambulance crew, a watchdog said.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sara Sorcher
March 26, 2014, 1:41 p.m.

Sen­at­ors hurled a flood of in­sults at seni­or State De­part­ment of­fi­cials on Wed­nes­day, in­sist­ing that the in­ter­na­tion­al push to re­move chem­ic­al weapons from Syr­ia has be­nefited, not pun­ished, strong­man Bashar al-As­sad at the ex­pense of tens of thou­sands of Syr­i­ans who have died since the deal was ne­go­ti­ated last year.

The com­bat­ive hear­ing, which saw law­makers dis­miss an­swers to ques­tions about U.S. strategy in Syr­ia as “ba­lo­ney” and “de­lu­sion­al,” was ex­plos­ive from start to fin­ish. The the­at­rics began after the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion dodged the first ques­tion from Sen. Robert Men­en­dez, who chairs the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee. The New Jer­sey Demo­crat wanted to know wheth­er the U.S. is con­sid­er­ing any mil­it­ary ac­tions to help en­sure that As­sad’s gov­ern­ment does not quash the op­pos­i­tion.

Anne Pat­ter­son, the as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for Near East­ern af­fairs, de­murred on out­lining pos­sible mil­it­ary op­tions in a pub­lic set­ting.

Cue the fire­works.

“Are you sit­ting here, try­ing to in­dic­ate to the me­dia and the people listen­ing that you guys have ac­tu­ally de­veloped a mil­it­ary strategy re­l­at­ive to Syr­ia, and that you will talk about it in a clas­si­fied set­ting?” Sen. Bob Cork­er, the top Re­pub­lic­an on the com­mit­tee, asked. “Be­cause if you are, that would be ma­jor news.”¦ [And it’s the most] ma­jor, mis­lead­ing ba­lo­ney I’ve heard since I’ve been in the U.S. Sen­ate.”

Pat­ter­son re­tor­ted that she would not “be, in ef­fect, bul­lied in­to an­swer­ing” in an open set­ting, so Cork­er answered for her.

“Let me just as­sure to the world: The U.S. has no mil­it­ary op­tions on the table,” he said. “What is our strategy in Syr­ia? I don’t see we have one, oth­er than let­ting people kill each oth­er off, and let­ting it fester…. To act like you have some sort of clas­si­fied in­form­a­tion is mis­lead­ing.”

Pat­ter­son in­sisted that the U.S. does have a policy to bol­ster the se­cur­ity of sur­round­ing coun­tries such as Jordan, send hu­man­it­ari­an as­sist­ance to rebels, and sup­port a dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion to the con­flict while try­ing to “change the cal­cu­lus on the bat­tle­field.”

“I agree that many ele­ments of our policy have not been suc­cess­ful,” Pat­ter­son ad­ded, “but I think we are try­ing to re­vise our policy now.”

Sen. John Mc­Cain ap­peared astoun­ded. “This con­flict’s been go­ing on for three years. 150,000 people are dead,” the Ari­zona Re­pub­lic­an said. “And we are only now re­vis­ing our policy.”

Cork­er had some dark words for U.S. in­ac­tion, call­ing the ef­fort to re­move and des­troy As­sad’s chem­ic­al stock­piles a “shiny ob­ject” to dis­tract the U.S. from the bloody con­flict. “The best thing that ever happened to As­sad — this sounds really crass — was kill 1,200 cit­izens with chem­ic­al weapons,” Cork­er said, “be­cause [the U.S.], Rus­sia, and oth­ers have now propped him up and used that killing to al­low 40,000 more people to be killed.”

Tom Coun­try­man, as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for in­ter­na­tion­al se­cur­ity and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, said the deal forced As­sad to give up the chem­ic­al weapons he wanted as a stra­tegic de­terrent against Is­rael and con­strained him from us­ing them against his own people. “These are ac­tu­al losses for him.”

Cork­er fired back: “I think you’re de­lu­sion­al.”

“If I could ex­pand on my de­lu­sions,” Coun­try­man said, the in­ter­na­tion­al agree­ment has not val­id­ated or fun­da­ment­ally strengthened As­sad enough to change the mil­it­ary cal­cu­lus on the ground.

Men­en­dez punted some of these fiery ques­tions to a clas­si­fied set­ting. He wants to know all the mil­it­ary op­tions be­ing con­sidered and to ob­tain a com­plete list of overt and cov­ert ac­tions the U.S. is tak­ing to help the vet­ted Syr­i­an rebels. The chair­man also wanted to know what the U.S. plans to do with any chem­ic­al weapons As­sad has not yet dis­closed — and what tan­gible con­sequences Syr­ia will face if it does not des­troy its de­clared stock­piles by June 30.

“That’s what we want to know,” Men­en­dez said. “I don’t want to go to a clas­si­fied hear­ing with what I read in The New York Times.

What We're Following See More »
FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many Signatures Has the Petition for Trump’s Tax Returns Received?
3 days ago
THE ANSWER

More than 1 million, setting a record. More than 100,000 signatures triggers an official White House response.

Source:
TIED TO RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Sen. Collins Open to Subpoena of Trump’s Tax Returns
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Susan Collins, who sits on the Intelligence Committee, "said on Wednesday she's open to using a subpoena to investigate President Donald Trump's tax returns for potential connections to Russia." She said the committee is also open to subpoenaing Trump himself. "This is a counter-intelligence operation in many ways," she said of Russia's interference. "That's what our committee specializes in. We are used to probing in depth in this area."

Source:
NPR ALSO LAUNCHES ETHICS WATCH
Obama Staffers Launch Group to Monitor Trump Ethics
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

"Top lawyers who helped the Obama White House craft and hold to rules of conduct believe President Donald Trump and his staff will break ethics norms meant to guard against politicization of the government — and they’ve formed a new group to prepare, and fight. United to Protect Democracy, which draws its name from a line in President Barack Obama’s farewell address that urged his supporters to pick up where he was leaving off, has already raised a $1.5 million operating budget, hired five staffers and has plans to double that in the coming months." Meanwhile, NPR has launched a "Trump Ethics Monitor" to track the resolution of ten ethics-related promises that the president has made.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login