The Pentagon is proposing to cut roughly $2 billion from troops’ pay and benefits, but senators Wednesday demonstrated that the plan is something of a lead balloon on Capitol Hill.
Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee pushed back against Pentagon officials Wednesday, suggesting a series of alternatives that could spare the benefits but keep the federal budget under Congress’s self-imposed caps.
“I understand where you’re coming from, you’ve got a budget cap that we created,” said South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham, referring to the department’s $496 billion base budget cap. “So if we could find a $2 billion safety valve here I think it would prevent them from just having to ignore the personal account and raid other accounts.”
Graham stressed that trying to find the funds to swap out the cuts should be an exercise for the Personnel Subcommittee, not Defense Department officials.
Robert Hale, the Defense Department’s comptroller, said the cuts are necessary to comply with Congress’s budget cap while also upgrading its equipment and keeping troops ready for combat. They would come from a mix of changes to health care costs, housing allowances, decreased funding for base grocery stores, and a pay freeze for top brass.
But it wasn’t just Graham who wanted the Pentagon to rethink its plans.
New York Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand and New Hampshire Republican Kelly Ayotte pressed officials on why the Defense Department couldn’t wait until after a commission studying military compensation and retirement released its report in February 2015.
Military pay is a sore spot for Congress this year, after lawmakers cut nearly $6 billion in military retiree benefits in the December budget, but then backpedaled furiously after mass outcry from veterans’ groups and the public.
But Hale pressed back, saying the Pentagon couldn’t afford to wait. “If we wait two years until we have the commission results “¦ then we’re going to have take all of this money out of readiness and modernization, and we think that will destroy a balance and damage national security,” he said.
What We're Following See More »
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."
Donald Trump's "transition team will meet next week with representatives of the tech industry, multiple sources confirmed, even as their candidate largely has been largely shunned by Silicon Valley. The meeting, scheduled for next Thursday at the offices of law and lobbying firm BakerHostetler, will include trade groups like the Information Technology Industry Council and the Internet Association that represent major Silicon Valley companies."
Today in bad news for Donald Trump:
- Newsweek found that a company he controlled did business with Cuba under Fidel Castro "despite strict American trade bans that made such undertakings illegal, according to interviews with former Trump executives, internal company records and court filings." In 1998, he spent at least $68,000 there, which was funneled through a consluting company "to make it appear legal."
- The Los Angeles Times reports that at a golf club he owns in California, Trump ordered that unattractive female staff be fired and replaced with prettier women.