Senate Skittish Over Cutting Troops’ Benefits

The Pentagon says Congress is forcing it to slice $2 billion, but lawmakers are balking at the Defense Department.

A U.S. soldier shops at the Bagram Base in Afghanistan.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
March 27, 2014, 1 a.m.

The Pentagon is pro­pos­ing to cut roughly $2 bil­lion from troops’ pay and be­ne­fits, but sen­at­ors Wed­nes­day demon­strated that the plan is something of a lead bal­loon on Cap­it­ol Hill.

Mem­bers of the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee pushed back against Pentagon of­fi­cials Wed­nes­day, sug­gest­ing a series of al­tern­at­ives that could spare the be­ne­fits but keep the fed­er­al budget un­der Con­gress’s self-im­posed caps.

“I un­der­stand where you’re com­ing from, you’ve got a budget cap that we cre­ated,” said South Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an Lind­sey Gra­ham, re­fer­ring to the de­part­ment’s $496 bil­lion base budget cap. “So if we could find a $2 bil­lion safety valve here I think it would pre­vent them from just hav­ing to ig­nore the per­son­al ac­count and raid oth­er ac­counts.”

Gra­ham stressed that try­ing to find the funds to swap out the cuts should be an ex­er­cise for the Per­son­nel Sub­com­mit­tee, not De­fense De­part­ment of­fi­cials.

Robert Hale, the De­fense De­part­ment’s comp­troller, said the cuts are ne­ces­sary to com­ply with Con­gress’s budget cap while also up­grad­ing its equip­ment and keep­ing troops ready for com­bat. They would come from a mix of changes to health care costs, hous­ing al­low­ances, de­creased fund­ing for base gro­cery stores, and a pay freeze for top brass.

But it wasn’t just Gra­ham who wanted the Pentagon to re­think its plans.

New York Demo­crat Kirsten Gil­librand and New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an Kelly Ayotte pressed of­fi­cials on why the De­fense De­part­ment couldn’t wait un­til after a com­mis­sion study­ing mil­it­ary com­pens­a­tion and re­tire­ment re­leased its re­port in Feb­ru­ary 2015.

Mil­it­ary pay is a sore spot for Con­gress this year, after law­makers cut nearly $6 bil­lion in mil­it­ary re­tir­ee be­ne­fits in the Decem­ber budget, but then back­pedaled furi­ously after mass out­cry from vet­er­ans’ groups and the pub­lic.

But Hale pressed back, say­ing the Pentagon couldn’t af­ford to wait. “If we wait two years un­til we have the com­mis­sion res­ults “¦ then we’re go­ing to have take all of this money out of read­i­ness and mod­ern­iz­a­tion, and we think that will des­troy a bal­ance and dam­age na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login