Senate Skittish Over Cutting Troops’ Benefits

The Pentagon says Congress is forcing it to slice $2 billion, but lawmakers are balking at the Defense Department.

A U.S. soldier shops at the Bagram Base in Afghanistan.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
March 27, 2014, 1 a.m.

The Pentagon is pro­pos­ing to cut roughly $2 bil­lion from troops’ pay and be­ne­fits, but sen­at­ors Wed­nes­day demon­strated that the plan is something of a lead bal­loon on Cap­it­ol Hill.

Mem­bers of the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee pushed back against Pentagon of­fi­cials Wed­nes­day, sug­gest­ing a series of al­tern­at­ives that could spare the be­ne­fits but keep the fed­er­al budget un­der Con­gress’s self-im­posed caps.

“I un­der­stand where you’re com­ing from, you’ve got a budget cap that we cre­ated,” said South Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an Lind­sey Gra­ham, re­fer­ring to the de­part­ment’s $496 bil­lion base budget cap. “So if we could find a $2 bil­lion safety valve here I think it would pre­vent them from just hav­ing to ig­nore the per­son­al ac­count and raid oth­er ac­counts.”

Gra­ham stressed that try­ing to find the funds to swap out the cuts should be an ex­er­cise for the Per­son­nel Sub­com­mit­tee, not De­fense De­part­ment of­fi­cials.

Robert Hale, the De­fense De­part­ment’s comp­troller, said the cuts are ne­ces­sary to com­ply with Con­gress’s budget cap while also up­grad­ing its equip­ment and keep­ing troops ready for com­bat. They would come from a mix of changes to health care costs, hous­ing al­low­ances, de­creased fund­ing for base gro­cery stores, and a pay freeze for top brass.

But it wasn’t just Gra­ham who wanted the Pentagon to re­think its plans.

New York Demo­crat Kirsten Gil­librand and New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an Kelly Ayotte pressed of­fi­cials on why the De­fense De­part­ment couldn’t wait un­til after a com­mis­sion study­ing mil­it­ary com­pens­a­tion and re­tire­ment re­leased its re­port in Feb­ru­ary 2015.

Mil­it­ary pay is a sore spot for Con­gress this year, after law­makers cut nearly $6 bil­lion in mil­it­ary re­tir­ee be­ne­fits in the Decem­ber budget, but then back­pedaled furi­ously after mass out­cry from vet­er­ans’ groups and the pub­lic.

But Hale pressed back, say­ing the Pentagon couldn’t af­ford to wait. “If we wait two years un­til we have the com­mis­sion res­ults “¦ then we’re go­ing to have take all of this money out of read­i­ness and mod­ern­iz­a­tion, and we think that will des­troy a bal­ance and dam­age na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
FORMER GOVERNOR, AMBASSADOR TO CHINA
Jon Huntsman in Line to be #2 at State
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS
SHOW OF UNITY
Ellison Bringing New DNC Chair Perez To Trump’s Address
7 hours ago
BREAKING
CASE TO CARRY ON
DOJ Drops Claim Against Texas’s Voter ID Law
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Department of Justice "is dropping a discrimination claim against a Texas law that required voters to present identification at the polls." The case will continue to carry on with private groups who filed the lawsuit. The DOJ dropped the claim because Texas is planning to "cure the deficiencies" with the law, according to a draft copy of the dismissal motion the DOJ sent to the Campaign Legal Center. Texas Governor Jim Abbott tweeted a picture of a headline sharing the information with a caption saying "It's a new day in D.C."

Source:
TROUBLE LOOMING?
Durbin Says Government Shutdown Possible
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
AT LEAST 19 TODAY
Jewish Community Keeps Receiving Threats
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login