A Milestone, and Miles to Go, for Obamacare

As the health care law’s first enrollment period comes to an end, advocates prepare to dive back in.

At the ready: Counselors at the San Antonio Housing Authority health fair.
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
Ronald Brownstein
March 27, 2014, 5 p.m.

SAN ANT­O­NIO — The loc­al co­ali­tion work­ing to en­roll this city’s le­gion of un­in­sured in cov­er­age provided by Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law has op­er­ated with cru­sad­ing fer­vor.

For Monday’s quasi-dead­line for the Af­ford­able Care Act’s open-en­roll­ment peri­od, the groups have sched­uled a mara­thon at the cav­ernous Alam­odome that will likely keep coun­selors at their key­boards sign­ing up ap­plic­ants un­til mid­night. “I just knew I could not wake up on April 1 know­ing that I went home at 5 p.m. on the day be­fore,” says An­drea Guajardo, the high-octane com­munity health dir­ect­or for the non­profit CHRIS­TUS Santa Rosa health sys­tem. “The ACA has the abil­ity to change the health tra­ject­ory [of this com­munity] for gen­er­a­tions.”

Few places match San Ant­o­nio in cap­tur­ing the need that in­spired health re­form — or the many chal­lenges the law faces as en­roll­ment largely con­cludes. (The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion this week al­lowed ex­ten­sions bey­ond March 31 for those whose ap­plic­a­tions re­main un­com­pleted be­cause of tech­nic­al prob­lems.)

Lack of in­sur­ance has long burdened this work­ing-class, heav­ily His­pan­ic com­munity. In Bex­ar County, where San Ant­o­nio sits, one-fifth of all res­id­ents lack health in­sur­ance, some 340,000 people. Guajardo, who didn’t see a dent­ist un­til she was 17 be­cause she grew up un­in­sured, says cov­er­age has seemed so dis­tant that many people simply ex­pect they won’t re­ceive the care they need to avoid chron­ic con­di­tions, like dia­betes, com­mon in their fam­il­ies. “A lot of folks have ac­cep­ted the idea that cov­er­age has been out of reach for them,” agrees Rep. Joa­quin Castro, D-Texas, who rep­res­ents the city. “But that’s what the law is de­signed to change.”

Loc­ally, as na­tion­ally, ful­filling that prom­ise has proven frus­trat­ing, messy, and re­ward­ing. The corps of coun­selors log­ging long hours re­gis­ter­ing the un­in­sured points to ex­hil­ar­at­ing mo­ments of re­lief in the eyes of people who learn they can af­ford cov­er­age for the first time. Watch­ing fam­il­ies en­roll is “life chan­ging,” says Dor­is McNary, a Texas or­gan­izer for En­roll Amer­ica, the lead­ing na­tion­al group sup­port­ing re­gis­tra­tion. “You are suck­ing dirt at the end of the day, but when you lay your head down you know those kids are go­ing to keep their daddy longer.”

Yet the work of the En­roll SA co­ali­tion also re­veals the con­tinu­ing head­winds. One is res­ist­ance from Re­pub­lic­an-led states. Texas, with 5.7 mil­lion un­in­sured, has provided no sup­port for out­reach and, like about half the states, has re­fused to ex­pand Medi­caid for work­ing poor adults who make too little to qual­i­fy for the ACA’s sub­sidies to buy private in­sur­ance. In San Ant­o­nio, that de­cision has dis­qual­i­fied about half of those seek­ing cov­er­age, the co­ali­tion cal­cu­lates.

Oth­er hurdles loom. Par­tic­u­larly among His­pan­ics, many of the un­covered have no ex­per­i­ence with in­sur­ance and little un­der­stand­ing of how it could help them. While coun­selors here uni­ver­sally say the fed­er­al web­site is now work­ing well, the con­tro­versy over its launch, the pro­ces­sion of delayed dead­lines, and the per­sist­ent polit­ic­al con­flict have left many who might be­ne­fit from the law skep­tic­al. In par­tic­u­lar, coun­selors must over­come wide­spread fear that cov­er­age will cost too much, al­though for this low-in­come pop­u­la­tion, premi­ums are of­ten min­im­al after fed­er­al sub­sidies. As en­roll­ment con­cludes, it is also clear the ad­min­is­tra­tion over­es­tim­ated the abil­ity of the un­in­sured to en­roll them­selves on­line and un­der­es­tim­ated the dif­fi­culty of con­vin­cing healthy young people to par­ti­cip­ate. Both sug­gest a need for great­er in­vest­ment in out­reach and coun­selors be­fore en­roll­ment re­sumes next fall.

In all these ways, the law is emer­ging from this first open-en­roll­ment peri­od in an equi­voc­al polit­ic­al po­s­i­tion. Re­gis­tra­tion hasn’t gone so badly as to guar­an­tee its doom — nor so well as to en­sure its sur­viv­al. The dir­ec­tion of premi­ums re­mains un­cer­tain. The law faces re­lent­less res­ist­ance from Re­pub­lic­ans in the courts, the states, and Con­gress, and an in­tens­ity gap in pub­lic opin­ion. Groups that most dis­like Obama­care (such as older and blue-col­lar whites) look im­plac­ably op­posed; mean­while, sup­port­ers are still strug­gling to get young people and minor­it­ies to sign up — much less to turn out to vote in Novem­ber. Over­all “at­ti­tudes about the law seem stable and neg­at­ive,” says GOP poll­ster Bill McIn­turff.

Giv­en those dy­nam­ics, Demo­crats might jus­ti­fi­ably ask wheth­er their pur­suit of uni­ver­sal health care has pro­duced more be­ne­fits or costs. Bill Clin­ton’s un­suc­cess­ful re­form push helped trig­ger the 1994 GOP land­slide that gave Re­pub­lic­ans al­most un­broken con­trol of both con­gres­sion­al cham­bers for the next 12 years; the back­lash against Obama’s plan helped Re­pub­lic­ans win the House in 2010 and could help de­liv­er them the Sen­ate in Novem­ber. Ab­sent those losses, Demo­crats might have passed many of their oth­er pri­or­it­ies, from im­mig­ra­tion re­form to uni­ver­sal preschool.

Health re­form won’t jus­ti­fy those costs un­less Obama can polit­ic­ally en­trench it be­fore he leaves of­fice, mostly by cov­er­ing more of the un­in­sured. In San Ant­o­nio, ad­voc­ates hope to ul­ti­mately en­roll about one-fourth of those eli­gible this year. But they also view that as just the first stage of a long march. “After March 31, we will take one minute to break,” Guajardo says, “and then we will start plan­ning for next year.”

What We're Following See More »
McMullin Leads in New Utah Poll
2 hours ago

Evan McMul­lin came out on top in a Emer­son Col­lege poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clin­ton took third with 24%. Gary John­son re­ceived 5% of the vote in the sur­vey.

Quinnipiac Has Clinton Up by 7
2 hours ago

A new Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll finds Hillary Clin­ton lead­ing Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” van­ished from the uni­versity’s early Oc­to­ber poll. A new PPRI/Brook­ings sur­vey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a vir­tu­al dead heat, with Trump tak­ing 41% of the vote to Clin­ton’s 40% in a four-way match­up.

Trump: I’ll Accept the Results “If I Win”
3 hours ago
Duterte Throws His Lot in with China
6 hours ago

During a state visit to China, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte "declared an end to his country’s strategic alignment with the United States and pledged cooperation with Beijing." Duterte told Chinese President Xi Jinping that he's "realigned myself in your ideological flow and maybe I will also go to Russia to talk to Putin and tell him that there are three of us against the world—China, Philippines, and Russia. It’s the only way.”

Hatch Considering 2018 Re-election Run
7 hours ago

Reports say that Orrin Hatch, who in 2012 declared that he would retire at the end of his term, is considering going back on that pledge to run for an eighth term. Hatch, who is the longest serving Republican in the Senate, is unlikely to make any official declaration until after this election cycle is completed.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.