U.S. Suspending Missile Defense Cooperation Talks with Russia

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
March 27, 2014, 9 a.m.

Wash­ing­ton is halt­ing talks with Mo­scow that were aimed at im­prov­ing un­der­stand­ing and co­oper­a­tion around mis­sile de­fense in re­sponse to events in Ukraine.

The bi­lat­er­al an­ti­mis­sile talks had not seen much trac­tion in re­cent years, even be­fore Rus­sia’s in­cur­sion in Ukraine and an­nex­a­tion of Crimea put them in­to a deep-freeze. The dis­cus­sions were aimed at as­suaging the Krem­lin’s con­cern that U.S. mis­sile in­ter­cept­ors planned for field­ing in the com­ing years in Ro­mania and Po­land were no threat to Rus­sia’s long-range nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al.

Elaine Bunn, deputy as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of De­fense for nuc­le­ar and mis­sile de­fense policy at a Tues­day con­gres­sion­al hear­ing said, “With re­gard to talks with Rus­sia on trans­par­ency and co­oper­a­tion, Rus­sia’s in­ter­ven­tion in Ukraine in vi­ol­a­tion of in­ter­na­tion­al law led to the sus­pen­sion of our mil­it­ary-to-mil­it­ary dia­logues, in­clud­ing [De­fense De­part­ment] ci­vil­ians, and we have sub­sequently not con­tin­ued to en­gage Rus­sia on the top­ic of mis­sile de­fense,” the Wash­ing­ton Times re­por­ted.

Pres­id­ent Obama re­portedly sent Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin a let­ter last May pro­pos­ing that the two na­tions de­vel­op a bind­ing ac­cord that would per­mit the ex­change of cer­tain data, aimed at con­firm­ing that their re­spect­ive an­ti­mis­sile sys­tems did not threaten one an­oth­er’s nuc­le­ar de­terrent forces.

The Pentagon In 2012 ac­know­ledged it was con­sid­er­ing sup­ply­ing Rus­sia with in­form­a­tion on the “ve­lo­city at burnout” of the Stand­ard Mis­sile 3 in­ter­cept­ors planned for field­ing in Europe, in or­der to prove they were not fast enough to tar­get Rus­si­an stra­tegic mis­siles.

At this week’s hear­ing of the House Armed Ser­vices Sub­com­mit­tee on Stra­tegic Forces, Bunn and the Pentagon’s Mis­sile De­fense Agency dir­ect­or, Vice Adm. James Syr­ing, said they did not sup­port provid­ing Mo­scow with the SM-3 burnout rate in­form­a­tion.

Cit­ing the “un­cer­tainty of where that in­form­a­tion would go,” Syr­ing said it was his “firm re­com­mend­a­tion not to re­lease it.” 

Mean­while, Obama used a high-pro­file speech in Brus­sels, Bel­gi­um, on Wed­nes­day to call for a stronger NATO armed forces pres­ence in Cent­ral and East­ern Europe to de­ter Rus­sia from mount­ing fur­ther ter­rit­ori­al in­cur­sions, the Los Angeles Times re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
TO BE VOTED ON NEXT MONTH
Pai Officially Announces Intent to Scrap Net Neutrality Rules
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
SAYS HE’S UNAWARE OF ACCUSATIONS
Conyers Denies Settling Harassment Claims
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
SPEAKER SAYS IN LETTER
Mugabe Resigns, Ending Impeachment Debate
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
HAITIANS TO BE MOST AFFECTED
White House to End TPS Program
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is ending a humanitarian program that has allowed some 59,000 Haitians to live and work in the United States since an earthquake ravaged their country in 2010, Homeland Security officials said on Monday. Haitians with what is known as Temporary Protected Status will be expected to leave the United States by July 2019 or face deportation. ... About 320,000 people now benefit from the Temporary Protected Status program, which was signed into law by President George Bush in 1990."

Source:
MAKES PERMANENT A PREVIOUS INJUNCTION
Federal Judge Blocks Sanctuary Cities Order
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge on Monday permanently blocked President Donald Trump's executive order to cut funding from cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities. U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected the administration's argument that the executive order applies only to a relatively small pot of money and said Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress. The judge had previously made the same arguments in a ruling that put a temporary hold on the executive order."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login