Senate Democrats are kicking off their 2014 election-year agenda this week with consideration of a bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10. And the legislation’s lead sponsor says almost every Democrat will vote “yes” on a crucial, procedural vote.
If Democrats get the wage bill through a cloture vote, it needs just a simple majority for final passage. All Democrats “may not be with us on the final bill,” Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said on a conference call with reporters Monday. “The key is to get over the filibuster of the Republicans, and I’m pretty confident we’ll have all the Democrats on that.”
All except for one, Harkin predicts. It is likely that Mark Pryor of Arkansas, who has come out against the proposal to raise the wage to $10.10, will not join the ranks. But even in that case, Pryor is not opposed to any minimum wage increase. He supports an effort to boost the Arkansas rate from $6.25 to $8.50 by 2017.
Harkin has said the incremental increase to the $10.10 rate, to be reached by 2016, is “nonnegotiable.”
Another red-state Democrat, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, has said she supports a minimum-wage increase, but still has concerns about the changes to wages for tipped workers and the timeline for a wage increase. Harkin’s proposal would increase the federal tipped wage from $2.13 to 70 percent of the regular minimum wage. And Virginia Democratic Sen. Mark Warner supports a minimum-wage increase but likewise has concerns about the timeline for phasing in the boost.
Democratic Sens. Kay Hagan of North Carolina and Mark Begich of Alaska back Harkin’s bill.
The bill still faces very low odds of ever becoming law. Democrats will need at least five Republicans to vote yes on cloture, and that doesn’t look very likely. Sen. John Thune, a member of the Republican leadership, has said that Senate Republicans “are pretty united” against the the wage proposal.
“If we don’t get 60 votes on the first vote we’ll continue to come back again and again,” Harkin pledged. “We’re not just going to have one vote and walk away from it. It’s much too important for that.”
Even if the wage increase makes it out of the upper chamber, it faces dim prospects in the House, where Speaker John Boehner has called it a job killer.
A Congressional Budget Office analysis found the proposal would reduce the number of workers in the labor force by 500,000 in 2016, which Democrats have pushed back against. CBO also predicted the wage increase would lift 900,000 out of poverty.
The Senate will begin consideration of the bill this week, but a final vote may not come until next week, Harkin said.
What We're Following See More »
After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."