Congress Will Get to Play With Bitcoin Next Week

A pile of Bitcoins are shown here after Software engineer Mike Caldwell minted them in his shop on April 26, 2013 in Sandy, Utah. Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency used over the Internet that is gaining in popularity worldwide. 
National Journal
Dustin Volz
April 2, 2014, 8:11 a.m.

Many law­makers in Con­gress still might not un­der­stand what bit­coin is, but next week they’ll at least be able to get their di­git­al hands on it.

Thanks to some as­sist­ance from Rep. Jared Pol­is, Rob­ocoin — a com­pany that builds ATMs for the vir­tu­al cur­ren­cies — will set up an in­form­a­tion­al kiosk in a con­gres­sion­al of­fice build­ing on Tues­day. The move comes amid grow­ing con­cerns about how, or if, gov­ern­ment should reg­u­late the bud­ding al­tern­at­ive pay­ment mar­ket that ex­ists only in com­puters.

“Come see a Rob­ocoin demo, hear a brief bit­coin talk from Con­gress­man Jared Pol­is, try buy­ing bit­coin your­self, and ask your burn­ing bit­coin ques­tions,” the in­vit­a­tion sent out to mem­bers of Con­gress reads. “Wel­come to the fu­ture of anti-fraud, anti-identi­fy theft, and anti-money laun­der­ing — this is cus­tom­er pro­tec­tion built for the 21st cen­tury.”

Bit­coin and oth­er di­git­al cur­ren­cies like it can be ex­changed for tra­di­tion­al dol­lars or spent at par­ti­cip­at­ing on­line vendors and some real-world re­tail­ers. Its sup­port­ers view it as a quick and in­nov­at­ive form of pay­ment that ducks some of the fees com­monly as­so­ci­ated with on­line trans­ac­tions, while its crit­ics view it as a province of an­onym­ous act­ors with ne­far­i­ous in­tent, such as money laun­der­ing or drug traf­fick­ing.

Pol­is, a Col­or­ado Demo­crat, has re­cently be­come an out­spoken ally of bit­coin, and an aide in his of­fice con­firmed that the event was largely meant to serve as “ex­pos­ure for law­makers who are still learn­ing about bit­coin.”

Last month, Pol­is jok­ingly called for a ban on the U.S. dol­lar last month in re­sponse to a let­ter Sen. Joe Manchin sent to fin­an­cial reg­u­lat­ors ask­ing them to ban the di­git­al cur­rency.

“The ex­change of dol­lar bills, in­clud­ing high-de­nom­in­a­tion bills, is cur­rently un­reg­u­lated and has al­lowed users to par­ti­cip­ate in il­li­cit activ­ity, while also be­ing highly sub­ject to for­gery, theft, and loss,” Pol­is said.

Manchin has since come around some­what on bit­coin, but linger­ing ques­tions about bit­coin’s volat­il­ity and feas­ib­il­ity per­sist. The IRS is­sued tax guid­ance last week that qual­i­fied bit­coin not as a cur­rency but as prop­erty, a de­cision that earned mixed re­views.

The re­cent col­lapse of Ja­pan­ese-based bit­coin ex­change Mt. Gox, which led to the quix­ot­ic dis­ap­pear­ance of a chunk of bit­coin val­ued at hun­dreds of mil­lions of dol­lars, has made some in­vestors more skit­tish.

Bit­coin’s pop­ular­ity has ex­ploded in the past year, as its us­age in­creased by more than 75 per­cent between Ju­ly and Decem­ber 2013. The fer­vency of its early ad­op­ters and grow­ing mar­ket value has led many in­vestors and busi­nesses, such as the Sac­ra­mento Kings and Over­stock.com, to al­low bit­coin as a meth­od of pay­ment.

The event next week is sched­uled for Tues­day from 4 to 7 p.m. in the Ray­burn House Of­fice Build­ing. It fol­lows a hear­ing on bit­coin be­ing held Wed­nes­day by the House Small Busi­ness Com­mit­tee, the first in the lower cham­ber on the top­ic. Late last year, the Sen­ate con­vened two hear­ings prob­ing the risks and op­por­tun­it­ies as­so­ci­ated with vir­tu­al cur­ren­cies.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×