Many lawmakers in Congress still might not understand what bitcoin is, but next week they’ll at least be able to get their digital hands on it.
Thanks to some assistance from Rep. Jared Polis, Robocoin — a company that builds ATMs for the virtual currencies — will set up an informational kiosk in a congressional office building on Tuesday. The move comes amid growing concerns about how, or if, government should regulate the budding alternative payment market that exists only in computers.
“Come see a Robocoin demo, hear a brief bitcoin talk from Congressman Jared Polis, try buying bitcoin yourself, and ask your burning bitcoin questions,” the invitation sent out to members of Congress reads. “Welcome to the future of anti-fraud, anti-identify theft, and anti-money laundering — this is customer protection built for the 21st century.”
Bitcoin and other digital currencies like it can be exchanged for traditional dollars or spent at participating online vendors and some real-world retailers. Its supporters view it as a quick and innovative form of payment that ducks some of the fees commonly associated with online transactions, while its critics view it as a province of anonymous actors with nefarious intent, such as money laundering or drug trafficking.
Polis, a Colorado Democrat, has recently become an outspoken ally of bitcoin, and an aide in his office confirmed that the event was largely meant to serve as “exposure for lawmakers who are still learning about bitcoin.”
Last month, Polis jokingly called for a ban on the U.S. dollar last month in response to a letter Sen. Joe Manchin sent to financial regulators asking them to ban the digital currency.
“The exchange of dollar bills, including high-denomination bills, is currently unregulated and has allowed users to participate in illicit activity, while also being highly subject to forgery, theft, and loss,” Polis said.
Manchin has since come around somewhat on bitcoin, but lingering questions about bitcoin’s volatility and feasibility persist. The IRS issued tax guidance last week that qualified bitcoin not as a currency but as property, a decision that earned mixed reviews.
The recent collapse of Japanese-based bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which led to the quixotic disappearance of a chunk of bitcoin valued at hundreds of millions of dollars, has made some investors more skittish.
Bitcoin’s popularity has exploded in the past year, as its usage increased by more than 75 percent between July and December 2013. The fervency of its early adopters and growing market value has led many investors and businesses, such as the Sacramento Kings and Overstock.com, to allow bitcoin as a method of payment.
The event next week is scheduled for Tuesday from 4 to 7 p.m. in the Rayburn House Office Building. It follows a hearing on bitcoin being held Wednesday by the House Small Business Committee, the first in the lower chamber on the topic. Late last year, the Senate convened two hearings probing the risks and opportunities associated with virtual currencies.
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”