A trio of House lawmakers is urging against providing any funds in the next fiscal year for the decommissioning of U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile silos.
U.S. Representatives Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) on Wednesday wrote to the senior Republican and Democratic members of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee urging them to include new language in upcoming fiscal 2015 spending legislation. The proposed provision would bar the Pentagon from using any budgeted funds to “reduce, convert, decommission, or otherwise move to nondeployed status” any active ICBM silos.
The Republican lawmakers hail from the three states that host the nation’s arsenal of roughly 450 Minuteman 3 missiles.
The New START accord with Russia requires the United States by 2018 to reduce to 700 the total number of strategic missiles and bomber aircraft that are actively deployed, with an additional 100 systems permitted in reserve. However, the matter of beginning the work required to mothball some of the Minuteman silos is a political hot potato in Congress.
A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers worked together last year to insert language in the omnibus fiscal 2014 spending law that forbids the Pentagon from using any appropriated funds to carry out environmental studies on silo decommissioning. The Air Force last month put on hold a nascent effort to conduct a preliminary environmental assessment on silo shut-downs, after a number of lawmakers accused the Pentagon of violating the spending law.
Daines, Lummis and Cramer in their Wednesday letter urged against providing any funding to the Pentagon that “may be used to prepare for or conduct an environmental impact study, environmental assessment, or other environmental study.”
What We're Following See More »
After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."