A trio of House lawmakers is urging against providing any funds in the next fiscal year for the decommissioning of U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile silos.
U.S. Representatives Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) on Wednesday wrote to the senior Republican and Democratic members of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee urging them to include new language in upcoming fiscal 2015 spending legislation. The proposed provision would bar the Pentagon from using any budgeted funds to “reduce, convert, decommission, or otherwise move to nondeployed status” any active ICBM silos.
The Republican lawmakers hail from the three states that host the nation’s arsenal of roughly 450 Minuteman 3 missiles.
The New START accord with Russia requires the United States by 2018 to reduce to 700 the total number of strategic missiles and bomber aircraft that are actively deployed, with an additional 100 systems permitted in reserve. However, the matter of beginning the work required to mothball some of the Minuteman silos is a political hot potato in Congress.
A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers worked together last year to insert language in the omnibus fiscal 2014 spending law that forbids the Pentagon from using any appropriated funds to carry out environmental studies on silo decommissioning. The Air Force last month put on hold a nascent effort to conduct a preliminary environmental assessment on silo shut-downs, after a number of lawmakers accused the Pentagon of violating the spending law.
Daines, Lummis and Cramer in their Wednesday letter urged against providing any funding to the Pentagon that “may be used to prepare for or conduct an environmental impact study, environmental assessment, or other environmental study.”
- 1 Why Trump Won't Take a Political Hit From Summit Follies
- 2 Democrats Face Strategic Dilemma on Kavanaugh
- 3 Smart Ideas: What the Strzok Hearing Tells Us About Oversight
- 4 Washington Will Struggle to Challenge—or Copy—the European Union's $5 Billion Google Fine
- 5 Donor Transparency Meets Russia Controversy Amid New Treasury Rule
What We're Following See More »
"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.
"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."