The newly installed CEO of Mozilla has chosen to step down following protests against him for his support of an anti-gay marriage law that had ignited the Internet over the past week.
Brendan Eich, who had been promoted to lead the company just last week, made the decision “for Mozilla and our community,” Mitchell Baker, the company chairwoman, announced in a blog post Thursday.
Eich’s promotion led to a flurry of online protests and even consternation from some Mozilla employees who had asked him to step down. On Monday, online dating site OkCupid essentially blocked Mozilla’s popular Firefox Web browser due to Eich’s stance on gay rights. OkCupid began greeting users who visited the mingling site with an open letter lambasting Eich for donating $1,000 to support a 2008 California measure to ban same-sex marriage, and wishing Mozilla “nothing but failure.”
Eich, in response, wrote a blog post in which he promised that Mozilla would be “a place that includes and supports everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, age, race, ethnicity, economic status, or religion.” He gave no indication then he planned to resign.
But the public scrutiny proved too much for the Mountain View, Calif.-based company, whose open-source Firefox browser boasts hundreds of millions of users worldwide.
“While painful, the events of the last week show exactly why we need the Web,” Baker wrote. “So all of us can engage freely in the tough conversations we need to make the world better.”
Baker did not say who would replace Eich and only offered that “leadership is still being discussed.”
Following the announcement of Eich’s resignation, John Lilly, a former chief executive at Mozilla, said on Twitter:
- 1 Why George W. Bush Won’t Go to the GOP Convention
- 2 Democrats Plan to Pound Trump Before He’s Nominated
- 3 Schools in Poor Areas Have More Students with Mental Health Needs
- 4 Is Trump Rich Enough to Fund a General-Election Campaign?
- 5 The 1 Easy Way Donald Trump Could Have Been Even Richer: Doing Nothing
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"