Immigration Policy Won’t Make It Into the Defense Bill, for Now

House conservatives are blocking a plan to grant legal status to military “Dreamers.”

Lizardo Buleje of San Antonio, Texas, stands in front of the U.S. Capitol during a rally on immigration reform October 23, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
Elahe Izad
April 4, 2014, 10:26 a.m.

A push by some Re­pub­lic­ans to in­clude lan­guage in a must-pass de­fense bill to grant leg­al status to “Dream­ers” in the mil­it­ary has hit a snag amid vo­cal op­pos­i­tion from a sub­set of House con­ser­vat­ives.

The pro­pos­al, stem­ming from a bill sponsored by Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jeff Den­ham of Cali­for­nia, will not be in­cluded in the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act, House Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Buck McK­eon an­nounced Fri­day. McK­eon is a co­spon­sor of the Den­ham bill.

“I have reached this con­clu­sion without re­gard to my views on the un­der­ly­ing policy, but be­cause I do not be­lieve that the Chair­man’s mark should be the ori­gin­al ven­ue for this de­bate,” McK­eon said in a state­ment. “Over the past sev­er­al days I have heard from mem­bers on and off the com­mit­tee on both sides of this is­sue. They have made sound ar­gu­ments and raised val­id con­cerns…. This is an im­port­ant is­sue that I know will con­tin­ue to be de­bated go­ing for­ward.”

Con­sid­er­a­tion of in­clud­ing the im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated pro­vi­sion in the NDAA bill, which would pre­vent mem­bers from vot­ing on it as a stand-alone bill, was first re­por­ted by Breit­bart News. It would al­low im­mig­rants brought here il­leg­ally when they were 15 or young­er and who then went on to serve in the mil­it­ary to qual­i­fy for per­man­ent res­id­ency. The pos­sib­il­ity of in­clud­ing it in the NDAA bill in­spired a back­lash from im­mig­ra­tion hard-liners, such as Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, who is cir­cu­lat­ing a “Dear Col­league” let­ter about it.

Brooks said in­clud­ing it in the de­fense bill “may stop the pas­sage of the NDAA by bring­ing in an ex­tra­cur­ricular is­sue that is wholly un­re­lated to na­tion­al se­cur­ity.”

On the bill it­self, Brooks said “it en­sures il­leg­al ali­ens will be put on the same foot­ing with Amer­ic­an cit­izens who are com­pet­ing for en­list­ment priv­ileges in our na­tion­al de­fense.”

But the pro­vi­sion isn’t dead yet. A House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee mem­ber can still in­tro­duce it in com­mit­tee. (Den­ham isn’t a mem­ber.) And if that doesn’t hap­pen, Den­ham has said he will in­tro­duce it in the House Rules Com­mit­tee as an amend­ment to NDAA.

“It’s very frus­trat­ing to see con­tro­versy on an is­sue from mem­bers who have nev­er served our coun­try and don’t un­der­stand the im­pacts that im­mig­rants have had on se­cur­ing our freedoms and se­cur­ing our na­tion­al free­dom,” Den­ham said.

When asked about that cri­ti­cism, Brooks re­spon­ded, “That’s bunk. Next ques­tion.”

This is­sue came up last year, but Den­ham with­drew con­sid­er­a­tion of the bill on the floor as House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte raised ob­jec­tions that his com­mit­tee had jur­is­dic­tion over such is­sues. Den­ham won’t be do­ing the same thing again, he said.

“I was con­fid­ent last year that I had the votes on my amend­ment, and I was will­ing to work with my con­fer­ence on the is­sue,” Den­ham said. “I’m con­fid­ent that my bill, as a stand-alone bill, will have over­whelm­ing sup­port of both con­fer­ences.”

The bill cur­rently has 42 co­spon­sors: 18 Demo­crats and 24 Re­pub­lic­ans.

What We're Following See More »
JUST IN CASE…
White House Adds Five New SCOTUS Candidates
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

SAVE THOSE PERTAINING TO EXEC BRANCH
Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
13 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
BRITISH PUBLICIST CONNECTED TO TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login