Immigration Policy Won’t Make It Into the Defense Bill, for Now

House conservatives are blocking a plan to grant legal status to military “Dreamers.”

Lizardo Buleje of San Antonio, Texas, stands in front of the U.S. Capitol during a rally on immigration reform October 23, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
Elahe Izad
April 4, 2014, 10:26 a.m.

A push by some Re­pub­lic­ans to in­clude lan­guage in a must-pass de­fense bill to grant leg­al status to “Dream­ers” in the mil­it­ary has hit a snag amid vo­cal op­pos­i­tion from a sub­set of House con­ser­vat­ives.

The pro­pos­al, stem­ming from a bill sponsored by Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jeff Den­ham of Cali­for­nia, will not be in­cluded in the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act, House Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Buck McK­eon an­nounced Fri­day. McK­eon is a co­spon­sor of the Den­ham bill.

“I have reached this con­clu­sion without re­gard to my views on the un­der­ly­ing policy, but be­cause I do not be­lieve that the Chair­man’s mark should be the ori­gin­al ven­ue for this de­bate,” McK­eon said in a state­ment. “Over the past sev­er­al days I have heard from mem­bers on and off the com­mit­tee on both sides of this is­sue. They have made sound ar­gu­ments and raised val­id con­cerns…. This is an im­port­ant is­sue that I know will con­tin­ue to be de­bated go­ing for­ward.”

Con­sid­er­a­tion of in­clud­ing the im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated pro­vi­sion in the NDAA bill, which would pre­vent mem­bers from vot­ing on it as a stand-alone bill, was first re­por­ted by Breit­bart News. It would al­low im­mig­rants brought here il­leg­ally when they were 15 or young­er and who then went on to serve in the mil­it­ary to qual­i­fy for per­man­ent res­id­ency. The pos­sib­il­ity of in­clud­ing it in the NDAA bill in­spired a back­lash from im­mig­ra­tion hard-liners, such as Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, who is cir­cu­lat­ing a “Dear Col­league” let­ter about it.

Brooks said in­clud­ing it in the de­fense bill “may stop the pas­sage of the NDAA by bring­ing in an ex­tra­cur­ricular is­sue that is wholly un­re­lated to na­tion­al se­cur­ity.”

On the bill it­self, Brooks said “it en­sures il­leg­al ali­ens will be put on the same foot­ing with Amer­ic­an cit­izens who are com­pet­ing for en­list­ment priv­ileges in our na­tion­al de­fense.”

But the pro­vi­sion isn’t dead yet. A House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee mem­ber can still in­tro­duce it in com­mit­tee. (Den­ham isn’t a mem­ber.) And if that doesn’t hap­pen, Den­ham has said he will in­tro­duce it in the House Rules Com­mit­tee as an amend­ment to NDAA.

“It’s very frus­trat­ing to see con­tro­versy on an is­sue from mem­bers who have nev­er served our coun­try and don’t un­der­stand the im­pacts that im­mig­rants have had on se­cur­ing our freedoms and se­cur­ing our na­tion­al free­dom,” Den­ham said.

When asked about that cri­ti­cism, Brooks re­spon­ded, “That’s bunk. Next ques­tion.”

This is­sue came up last year, but Den­ham with­drew con­sid­er­a­tion of the bill on the floor as House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte raised ob­jec­tions that his com­mit­tee had jur­is­dic­tion over such is­sues. Den­ham won’t be do­ing the same thing again, he said.

“I was con­fid­ent last year that I had the votes on my amend­ment, and I was will­ing to work with my con­fer­ence on the is­sue,” Den­ham said. “I’m con­fid­ent that my bill, as a stand-alone bill, will have over­whelm­ing sup­port of both con­fer­ences.”

The bill cur­rently has 42 co­spon­sors: 18 Demo­crats and 24 Re­pub­lic­ans.

What We're Following See More »
FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many Signatures Has the Petition for Trump’s Tax Returns Received?
3 days ago
THE ANSWER

More than 1 million, setting a record. More than 100,000 signatures triggers an official White House response.

Source:
TIED TO RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Sen. Collins Open to Subpoena of Trump’s Tax Returns
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Susan Collins, who sits on the Intelligence Committee, "said on Wednesday she's open to using a subpoena to investigate President Donald Trump's tax returns for potential connections to Russia." She said the committee is also open to subpoenaing Trump himself. "This is a counter-intelligence operation in many ways," she said of Russia's interference. "That's what our committee specializes in. We are used to probing in depth in this area."

Source:
NPR ALSO LAUNCHES ETHICS WATCH
Obama Staffers Launch Group to Monitor Trump Ethics
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

"Top lawyers who helped the Obama White House craft and hold to rules of conduct believe President Donald Trump and his staff will break ethics norms meant to guard against politicization of the government — and they’ve formed a new group to prepare, and fight. United to Protect Democracy, which draws its name from a line in President Barack Obama’s farewell address that urged his supporters to pick up where he was leaving off, has already raised a $1.5 million operating budget, hired five staffers and has plans to double that in the coming months." Meanwhile, NPR has launched a "Trump Ethics Monitor" to track the resolution of ten ethics-related promises that the president has made.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login