Court Upholds FTC’s Power to Sue Hacked Companies

A federal court rejects a bid from Wyndham Hotels to undercut federal authority over data security.

Wyndham hotel in Pittsburgh, Pa.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
April 7, 2014, 12:56 p.m.

The Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion has the power to sue com­pan­ies that fail to pro­tect their cus­tom­ers’ data, a fed­er­al court in New Jer­sey said Monday.

The rul­ing shoots down a chal­lenge from Wyndham Ho­tels, which ar­gued that the FTC over­stepped its au­thor­ity with a 2012 law­suit against the glob­al hotel chain.

The de­cision by U.S. Dis­trict Court Judge Es­th­er Salas is a ma­jor win for the agency. If the court had sided with Wyndham, it would have stripped the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment of over­sight of data se­cur­ity prac­tices just as hack­ers be­gin to pull off more and more high-pro­file at­tacks.

Salas said her de­cision “does not give the FTC a blank check to sus­tain a law­suit against every busi­ness that has been hacked,” but that she must fol­low the “bind­ing and per­suas­ive pre­ced­ent” to up­hold the agency’s au­thor­ity.

The FTC is cur­rently in­vest­ig­at­ing Tar­get over the massive hack last year that ex­posed in­form­a­tion on 40 mil­lion cred­it cards. Tar­get could have pre­ven­ted the at­tack with bet­ter se­cur­ity prac­tices, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent re­port from the Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

The FTC has sued dozens of com­pan­ies in re­cent years for fail­ing to take reas­on­able steps to pro­tect cus­tom­er data. The agency says it has the au­thor­ity to po­lice data se­cur­ity prac­tices be­cause Con­gress gave it power over “un­fair” busi­ness prac­tices.

The FTC sued Wyndham in 2012, main­tain­ing that the hotel chain didn’t use ba­sic se­cur­ity meas­ures such as fire­walls, com­plex pass­words, or sep­ar­at­ing net­works in dif­fer­ent loc­a­tions. As a res­ult, hack­ers were able to pen­et­rate a com­puter net­work in a Wyndham hotel in Phoenix and ul­ti­mately make off with in­form­a­tion on 500,000 cred­it cards, the FTC charged.

Wyndham asked the fed­er­al court to throw out the suit, ar­guing that in­ad­equate data se­cur­ity prac­tices aren’t “un­fair” un­der the leg­al defin­i­tion. The com­pany also claimed the FTC should have pub­lished clear rules on data se­cur­ity be­fore fil­ing suit.

But Judge Salas said she wouldn’t “carve out a data-se­cur­ity ex­cep­tion” to the FTC’s power over un­fair prac­tices. She also con­cluded that the agency isn’t re­quired to spell-out spe­cif­ic data se­cur­ity rules. 

Al­though the court dis­missed Wyndham’s at­tempt to block the suit, the FTC will still have to prove the charges.  

FTC Chair­wo­man Edith Ramirez said she’s “pleased” with the de­cision and looks for­ward to try­ing the case against Wyndham. 

“Com­pan­ies should take reas­on­able steps to se­cure sens­it­ive con­sumer in­form­a­tion,” she said. “When they do not, it is not only ap­pro­pri­ate but crit­ic­al that the FTC take ac­tion on be­half of con­sumers.”

Mi­chael Valentino, a Wyndham spokes­man, noted that the de­cision is lim­ited to the FTC’s power and does not ad­dress wheth­er Wyndham broke the law.   “We con­tin­ue to be­lieve the FTC lacks the au­thor­ity to pur­sue this type of case against Amer­ic­an busi­nesses, and has failed to pub­lish any reg­u­la­tions that would give such busi­nesses fair no­tice of any pro­posed stand­ards for data se­cur­ity,” he said. “We in­tend to de­fend our po­s­i­tion vig­or­ously.”  

Mi­chael Valentino, a Wyndham spokes­man, noted that the de­cision is lim­ited to the FTC’s power and does not ad­dress wheth­er Wyndham broke the law.

“We con­tin­ue to be­lieve the FTC lacks the au­thor­ity to pur­sue this type of case against Amer­ic­an busi­nesses, and has failed to pub­lish any reg­u­la­tions that would give such busi­nesses fair no­tice of any pro­posed stand­ards for data se­cur­ity,” he said. “We in­tend to de­fend our po­s­i­tion vig­or­ously.” 

Al­though the FTC can or­der com­pan­ies to change their busi­ness prac­tices, the agency has no fin­ing au­thor­ity. Demo­crats are push­ing sev­er­al bills in Con­gress that would ex­pand the FTC’s au­thor­ity over data se­cur­ity, in­clud­ing give the agency the power to fine com­pan­ies for non­com­pli­ance.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
1 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login