On Feb. 26, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to the Senate floor and declared that billionaire Republican businessmen Charles and David Koch were “un-American.” He’s barely been able to stop talking about the “Koch brothers” ever since.
On March 4, Reid declared that Senate Republicans were “addicted to Koch.” On March 13, Reid mentioned the “Koch brothers” in a floor speech 25 times. This week, he said Republicans should wear Koch insignia on their suits — like NASCAR drivers.
It’s all part of Reid and the Democrats’ calculated efforts to summon a suitable villain in 2014. Reid believes that the Kochs, the financiers at the center of a nationwide GOP network that is spending millions of dollars on campaign ads against Democrats, are the perfect foil.
The good folks at the Sunlight Foundation have created a tool, CapitolWords, to show just how much Reid and his fellow Democrats are pushing the “Koch brothers” message.
The “Koch brothers” — who run Koch Industries, the Kansas-based firm that Forbes ranks as the second-largest private company in the United States — went unmentioned on the House and Senate floors between February 1998 and December 2010.
But in March 2014, their names were called out 79 times — and no one cited them more than Reid. Already, the Koch brothers have been name-dropped 38 times in April.
“They may believe that whoever has the most money gets the most free speech,” Reid declared in mid-March. “That is wrong, it is unfair, and it is untrue. I will do whatever it takes to expose their campaign, their campaign to rig the American political system to benefit the wealthy at the expense of the middle class.”
The volume of the Democrats’ Koch brothers messaging is cranked so high that its rise rivals congressional mentions of Russian President Vladimir Putin, even amid the incursion into Crimea and the international standoff over Ukraine. In fact, so far in April, Sunlight’s data show that “Koch brothers” has been said more than “Vladimir Putin.”
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.