Here’s a New Senate Odd Couple: Cory Booker and Tim Scott

The Democrat and Republican team up for their legislation meant to boost apprenticeships.

National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
Elahe Izad
April 9, 2014, 9:33 a.m.

When it comes to polit­ics, Sens. Cory Book­er of New Jer­sey and Tim Scott of South Car­o­lina have very little in com­mon.

Book­er, the former may­or of Ne­wark, N.J., be­came a na­tion­al polit­ic­al celebrity while at­tempt­ing to po­s­i­tion him­self as a pro­gress­ive on is­sues like un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance (al­though his pro­gress­ive bona fides have been called in­to ques­tion).

As for Scott, he was a rising star in the tea party class of 2010 in the House and is a reg­u­lar on the con­ser­vat­ive-con­fer­ence cir­cuit, with a 90 per­cent score­card rat­ing from Her­it­age Ac­tion.

Book­er’s score? Zero per­cent.

But the two — who were spot­ted hav­ing a spir­ited dis­cus­sion in the Cap­it­ol base­ment as they made their way to Tues­day votes — have un­veiled le­gis­la­tion they hope will in­crease ap­pren­tice­ships in Amer­ica.

The Lever­aging and En­er­giz­ing Amer­ica’s Ap­pren­tice­ship Pro­grams, or Leap Act, is meant to in­crease youth em­ploy­ment while build­ing up skills for good-pay­ing jobs. The bill would give fed­er­al tax cred­its to em­ploy­ers in ex­change for hir­ing people who are re­gistered as ap­pren­tices, either with the Labor De­part­ment or a state agency. The cred­it is $1,500 for hir­ing ap­pren­tices un­der 25, and $1,000 for those over 25.

Ac­cord­ing to the sen­at­ors’ of­fices, it would be paid for by cut­ting back on print­ing costs. Es­sen­tially, it would bar the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment from print­ing pub­lic­a­tions that are also on­line, ex­cept for ma­ter­i­al in­ten­ded for seni­ors, Medi­care re­cip­i­ents, or places with lim­ited In­ter­net ac­cess.

Book­er and Scott do have a couple of things in com­mon. They both came to the Sen­ate mid-cycle. Scott was ap­poin­ted by South Car­o­lina Gov. Nikki Haley to fill former Sen. Jim De­Mint’s seat when the lat­ter de­par­ted to head up the Her­it­age Found­a­tion. Book­er ran and won a spe­cial elec­tion to fill the late Sen. Frank Lauten­berg’s seat.

Oh, and they are the Sen­ate’s only two Afric­an-Amer­ic­an mem­bers.

Book­er has riled up pro­gress­ives in the past, with his as­so­ci­ations with Wall Street and agree­ing with Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Chris Christie on is­sues re­lated to school re­form, such as ex­pand­ing charter schools.

But for all the cri­ti­cism he has re­ceived in the past as try­ing to con­stantly po­s­i­tion him­self in the spot­light, he’s taken a de­cidedly more low-key ap­proach to be­ing a sen­at­or — you won’t find him rush­ing to the mics or hold­ing court with re­port­ers in the halls of the Cap­it­ol.

Scott is a tea-party fa­vor­ite. At a time when the GOP is strug­gling to reach out to minor­ity voters, he, for many, rep­res­ents pos­sib­il­it­ies for the fu­ture of the party. He is the first black Re­pub­lic­an to be elec­ted to Con­gress from the Deep South since Re­con­struc­tion. But tak­ing a low-key ap­proach on the Hill is very typ­ic­al of his polit­ics; for in­stance, when the NAACP’s North Car­o­lina chapter pres­id­ent ba­sic­ally called him a “dummy” be­ing used by a “vent­ri­lo­quist,” he de­clined to fire back. “The best way to re­spond to at­tacks from someone you’ve nev­er met, who’s nev­er been there dur­ing the most dif­fi­cult times of your life, is not to re­spond at all,” Scott told Na­tion­al Journ­al at the time.

So these two low-key yet rising stars in their re­spect­ive parties have struck some com­mon ground. Wheth­er their bill will make it through the Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled Sen­ate in a midterm elec­tion year is un­clear, es­pe­cially since Demo­crats’ midterm agenda is fo­cused on party pri­or­it­ies such as min­im­um wage and equal pay. But this bill and some oth­er pending bi­par­tis­an bills, like one re­form­ing man­dat­ory min­im­um sen­ten­cing from an­oth­er polit­ic­al odd couple (Sens. Dick Durbin and Mike Lee), could get some of the spot­light this year, too.

What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
2 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login