Republicans Want to Fire Someone to Stop Preventable Veteran Deaths

But VA officials warn against widespread punishment for what they see as a limited problem.

National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
April 9, 2014, 1:26 p.m.

Army vet­er­an Barry Coates went to a clin­ic run by the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment in Novem­ber 2010 suf­fer­ing from severe ab­dom­in­al pain. He said that more than a year later, after mul­tiple re­quests for a colono­scopy, he fi­nally re­ceived the pro­ced­ure — only to dis­cov­er he had stage-four can­cer.

Coates, who is ter­min­ally ill, test­i­fied be­fore the House Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee on Wed­nes­day as part of a look by law­makers in­to the rash of pre­vent­able deaths at VA clin­ics and hos­pit­als. The most re­cent re­port, re­leased earli­er this week, linked 23 vet­er­ans’ deaths to delays in can­cer treat­ment. Chair­man Jeff Miller and oth­er com­mit­tee mem­bers said that num­ber could be closer to 40.

And Miller and oth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans made clear Wed­nes­day that at least one thing must be done im­me­di­ately: Someone should be fired.

Miller’s le­gis­la­tion would make the pro­cess for fir­ing high-rank­ing civil ser­vants largely the same as fir­ing con­gres­sion­al staffers — who are con­sidered at-will em­ploy­ees. That would mean tak­ing away the no­ti­fic­a­tion and abil­ity to ap­peal dis­cip­lin­ary de­cisions cur­rently offered.

Re­pub­lic­ans lamen­ted that, to their know­ledge, no one tied to vet­er­an deaths had been ter­min­ated, and that em­ploy­ees must be held ac­count­able.

But while every Demo­crat­ic mem­ber ac­know­ledged that something must be done to de­term­ine how to pre­vent these deaths, they stopped short of back­ing the le­gis­la­tion.

“It is in­cum­bent upon all of us here to make sure the VA is ac­count­able,” said Cali­for­nia Demo­crat Ju­lia Brown­ley, who hasn’t yet thrown her sup­port be­hind the le­gis­la­tion. And Rep. Raul Ruiz, also from Cali­for­nia, re­com­men­ded that com­mit­tee mem­bers com­mis­sion a study to com­pare pre­vent­able deaths and cases of neg­li­gence with­in the VA to rates with­in top private hos­pit­als.

The VA is push­ing back on the le­gis­la­tion as well. VA Sec­ret­ary Eric Shin­seki told law­makers last week that he has the tools he needs to make sure VA per­son­nel are ad­equately do­ing their jobs.

And Thomas Lynch, as­sist­ant deputy un­der­sec­ret­ary for health for clin­ic­al op­er­a­tions at the Vet­er­ans Health Ad­min­is­tra­tion, echoed those com­ments, say­ing: “I un­der­stand your con­cern “¦ re­gard­ing ac­count­ab­il­ity.”¦ I’m troubled a little bit about wheth­er or not fir­ing some­body is ne­ces­sar­ily the an­swer.”

But the com­mit­tee’s Re­pub­lic­ans did not budge.

In­di­ana Re­pub­lic­an Jack­ie Wal­or­ski, whose fath­er died of colon can­cer, broke in­to tears while ques­tion­ing Coates. She called the VA “a bur­eau­crat­ic sys­tem that is broken.”

And the com­mit­tee mem­bers have a power­ful ally in their quest to help the VA clean house. House Speak­er John Boehner told re­port­ers earli­er this month that “the sec­ret­ary needs to have more au­thor­ity to man­age his own de­part­ment. It’s as simple as that,” adding that he be­lieves the VA is fail­ing vet­er­ans and their fam­il­ies.

And though Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats on the com­mit­tee have not come to­geth­er on VA fir­ings, they all agreed on one thing: The VA needs to be more forth­com­ing with Con­gress.

Miller said that the com­mit­tee has been wait­ing for months on in­form­a­tion about vet­er­ans’ deaths that are tied to VA care, and sev­er­al mem­bers said that when prob­lems at the VA arise, law­makers are giv­en calm and gen­er­al re­sponses versus spe­cif­ic ways the de­part­ment is mov­ing for­ward.

“It’s just my feel­ing and my only con­clu­sion that I can come to “¦ is that there is something that you don’t want the pub­lic to hear,” Brown­ley said.

What We're Following See More »
DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY U.S. INTEL
Putin-Linked Think Tank Developed Plan to Influence U.S. Election
3 days ago
THE LATEST

A Russian government think tank run by Putin loyalists "developed a plan to swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine voters’ faith in the American electoral system." Two confidential documents from the Putin-backed Institute for Strategic Studies, obtained by U.S. intelligence, provide "the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election."

Source:
HELPED WIN FISA APPROVAL
FBI Relied on Dossier Allegations to Monitor Page
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI last year used a dossier of allegations of Russian ties to Donald Trump's campaign as part of the justification" to monitor Carter Page, who was then a defense adviser to the Trump campaign. "The dossier has also been cited by FBI Director James Comey in some of his briefings to members of Congress in recent weeks."

Source:
AIR FORCE SCRAMBLES JETS IN RESPONSE
Russian Bombers Fly Near Alaska
5 days ago
WHY WE CARE
A MESSAGE TO RUSSIA?
Pentagon Deploying F-35s to Europe
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"The Air Force is set to deploy its high-tech, fifth-generation F-35A fighter jets to Europe this weekend as part of an effort to assure U.S. allies there who are worried about Russian aggression." The new, state-of-the-art fighters will train with European air units. "The Pentagon noted that the deployment had been long planned, meaning it was not a reaction to recent increasing tensions between the United States and Russia," although a statement noted the move is part of the "European Reassurance Initiative," which began three years ago when Russia annexed Crimea.

Source:
NOT ON SCHEDULE
Tillerson Meets Putin
1 weeks ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login