Japan’s case for stockpiling plutonium risks being undercut by new, local moves to stop the nation’s power plants from running on the bomb-usable material.
Japanese community officials described new legal steps in opposing the use of mixed-oxide fuel — a plutonium-uranium blend considered potentially more hazardous than other reactor material — as Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government prepared to authorize the first reactivation of atomic sites since the 2011 Fukushima plant disaster. The city of Hakodate last week sued to stop work on a nearby MOX fuel reactor, and Shizuoka prefecture’s governor said he wants to reverse his predecessor’s approval of its use.
The moves came as Abe’s administration prepared as soon as Friday to finalize an energy policy calling for the separation of additional plutonium from nuclear waste, the New York Times reported. This ties in with the planned launch of the Rokkasho reprocessing facility, which could generate yet more plutonium on top of 9 tons it has stockpiled thus far, enough to power 2,000 nuclear arms.
One nonproliferation expert said public opposition to MOX fuel is a relatively recent development in Japan. Relatively few Japanese reactors are slated to run on the material, and the new local steps could further undermine the case for Rokkasho’s launch, Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Project in Washington, told Global Security Newswire on Tuesday.
“There really is no practical way to irradiate large quantities of the surplus plutonium anytime soon, with the reactors they have or are planning,” said Sokolski. “Given how much plutonium they already have, plus what they intend to produce, the idea that you can eliminate these plutonium stocks in reactors is preposterous.”
He also noted China’s vocal opposition to any increased Japanese plutonium production.
Correction: This article was updated to more accurately characterize the plutonium-separation component of Japan’s Rokkasho facility and to include additional explanation by Henry Sokolski.
What We're Following See More »
A new Investor’s Business Daily/TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump each earning 41% support. On the one hand, the poll has been skewing in Trump's favor this year, relative to other polls. But on the other, data guru Nate Silver called the IBD/TIPP poll the most accurate in 2012.
"Sen. Bernie Sanders, a loyal soldier for Hillary Clinton since he conceded the Democratic presidential nomination in July, plans to push liberal legislation with like-minded senators with or without Clinton’s support if she is elected— and to aggressively oppose appointments that do not pass muster with the party’s left wing." Sanders and other similarly inclined senators are already "plotting legislation" on climate change, prison reform, the minimum wage, and tuition-free college.
"The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use."
Baseball great Curt Schilling says he still needs to clear a challenge to Sen. Elizabeth Warren with his wife, but in the meantime, he's found something to occupy him: the former hurler is going to host a daily online radio show on Breitbart.com. "The show marks Schilling’s return to media six months after ESPN fired him for sharing an anti-transgender Facebook post."
The New Yorker has endorsed Hillary Clinton, saying that "barring some astonishment," she will become the next president. Calling Clinton "distinctly capable," the magazine excoriates Donald Trump as a candidate who "favors conspiracy theory and fantasy, deriving his knowledge from the darker recesses of the Internet and 'the shows.'" Additionally, the historical nature of the possibility of "send[ing] a woman to the White House" is not lost on the editors, who note the possibility more than once in the endorsement.