Feinstein Criticizes Extending Timetable for Nuclear-Security Projects

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks in January on Capitol Hill. On Wednesday, the senior lawmaker criticized the Energy Department's plan to extend the schedule for completing work on multiple nuclear-security projects.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Oswald
April 11, 2014, 9:38 a.m.

A seni­or U.S. sen­at­or on Wed­nes­day cri­ti­cized the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion for ex­tend­ing the mile­stone sched­ule on a num­ber of nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity pro­jects.

Speak­ing at a Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations En­ergy and Wa­ter De­vel­op­ment Sub­com­mit­tee hear­ing, Sen­at­or Di­anne Fein­stein (D-Cal­if.) singled out En­ergy De­part­ment plans for re­mov­ing weapons-us­able urani­um from roughly 200 glob­al nuc­le­ar re­act­ors and for se­cur­ing sens­it­ive ra­di­olo­gic­al ma­ter­i­als held at ci­vil­ian U.S. fa­cil­it­ies.

Fein­stein said the de­part­ment’s fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al would push back by five years, to 2035, the tar­get date for wrap­ping up work on the world­wide re­act­or-con­ver­sion pro­ject.

“This simply is un­ac­cept­able at the same time we’re pour­ing money in­to the mod­ern­iz­a­tion of cer­tain war­heads. It’s just un­ac­cept­able,” Fein­stein said.

As part of the Glob­al Threat Re­duc­tion Ini­ti­at­ive, the pro­ject aims to con­vert re­act­ors and iso­tope-pro­duc­tion fa­cil­it­ies that use highly en­riched urani­um to run in­stead on low-en­riched ma­ter­i­al, or shut them down al­to­geth­er. Once the re­act­ors no longer have use for the HEU ma­ter­i­al, it can be re­moved and per­man­ently dis­posed of un­der a sep­ar­ate GTRI pro­gram.

The En­ergy De­part­ment has taken some cri­ti­cism from anti-nuc­le­ar ad­voc­ates for its budget pro­pos­al, which would re­duce by al­most 18 per­cent spend­ing on non­pro­lif­er­a­tion activ­it­ies while sim­ul­tan­eously in­creas­ing fund­ing for nuc­le­ar arms by close to 7 per­cent.

In an ex­change with En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz, who was testi­fy­ing be­fore the ap­pro­pri­ations sub­com­mit­tee, Fein­stein noted that his de­part­ment also was delay­ing the com­ple­tion of a GTRI pro­ject to in­stall se­cur­ity up­grades at U.S. non­mil­it­ary sites hous­ing se­lec­ted ra­di­olo­gic­al and nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als.

The pro­ject funds se­cur­ity up­grades for ci­vil­ian sites that con­tain these sens­it­ive ra­di­olo­gic­al sources used for re­search, med­ic­al and com­mer­cial pur­poses. As of the end of fisc­al 2013, the ini­ti­at­ive had in­stalled se­cur­ity en­hance­ments at 1,674 sites, ac­cord­ing to the En­ergy De­part­ment’s budget pro­pos­al.

The nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity ef­fort was es­tab­lished to ad­dress con­cerns that ci­vil­ian sites could be vul­ner­able to the theft of weapons-us­able ra­di­olo­gic­al sources, which could later be used to build a so-called “dirty bomb.” Such an im­pro­vised device might use con­ven­tion­al ex­plos­ives to dis­perse ra­dio­act­ive con­tam­in­ants across a wide area.

The de­part­ment’s budget re­quest said that “the pre­vi­ous [pro­ject] end date of 2044 is now TBD pending a re­view” of the scope and fin­an­cial re­quire­ments.

“Has there been a change in threat as­sess­ment that I’m not aware of?” Fein­stein asked. “Are ter­ror­ists no longer in­ter­ested in ac­quir­ing nuc­le­ar or ra­di­olo­gic­al bombs for im­pro­vised nuc­le­ar devices and dirty bombs? I don’t un­der­stand how you can de­fend this budget on non­pro­lif­er­a­tion cuts.”

Mon­iz ac­know­ledged that “things like the GTRI pro­gram … they do have re­duc­tions.” But he ad­ded that a “very con­strained” budget en­vir­on­ment ne­ces­sit­ated “some tough choices.”

The En­ergy sec­ret­ary de­fen­ded the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s over­all pro­gress in ef­forts to se­cure nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als world­wide.

“There’s been a surge, really, over the last four years with 12 coun­tries, all HEU [highly en­riched urani­um] re­moved from them, in­clud­ing I think three in the last year, year-and-a-half,” Mon­iz said.

What We're Following See More »
THROUGH AN INTERMEDIARY
Manafort Offered Russian Billionaire Briefings During Campaign
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Less than two weeks before Donald Trump accepted the Republican presidential nomination, his campaign chairman offered to provide briefings on the race to a Russian billionaire closely aligned with the Kremlin, according to people familiar with the discussions. Paul Manafort made the offer in an email to an overseas intermediary, asking that a message be sent to Oleg Deripaska, an aluminum magnate with whom Manafort had done business in the past, these people said. 'If he needs private briefings we can accommodate,' Manafort wrote in the July 7, 2016, email.

Source:
RAISE LATER THIS YEAR POSSIBLE
Interest Rates Don’t Change
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Federal Reserve left its benchmark interest rate unchanged and said Wednesday that it would begin to withdraw some of the trillions of dollars that it invested in the American economy after the 2008 financial crisis. The widely expected announcement reflected the Fed’s confidence in continued economic growth...most Fed officials predicted in a new round of economic forecasts that the Fed would increase rates later this year."

Source:
INCLUDES COMEY FIRING
Mueller Looking For White House Docs
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

Special Counsel Robert Mueller "has asked the White House for documents about some of President Trump’s most scrutinized actions since taking office, including the firing of his national security adviser and F.B.I. director...Mueller is also interested in an Oval Office meeting Mr. Trump had with Russian officials in which he said the dismissal of the F.B.I. director had relieved 'great pressure' on him."

Source:
BUT WILL MCCAIN VOTE YES?
Graham-Cassidy to Get a Floor Vote Next Week
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
3.5M PEOPLE
All of Puerto Rico Without Power
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Hurricane Maria has knocked out power to the entire island of Puerto Rico, home to 3.5m residents, emergency officials have said."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login