With jobs and the economy a given, Republicans are working to turn the 2014 elections into an argument over the Affordable Care Act. And that message could be helped by a high-profile Senate race in Kansas against the very woman who oversaw the law’s disastrous rollout.
Some Democrats are asking outgoing Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to challenge her home state senator, Republican Pat Roberts, in the fall, the The New York Times reported Wednesday.
Nominating Sebelius, a potentially serious contender in the state, would force national Republicans to spend money in Kansas, pulling away funds that could help them in other Senate battlegrounds this fall. Sebelius was a popular two-term governor in Kansas before joining the Obama administration and could put Roberts in the position of needing outside help, Democrats argue.
But Sebelius’s entry into the race could also boost Republican efforts elsewhere in the country. It’s not hard to imagine the national party using the caretaker of the first six months of the Affordable Care Act as a straw man for Democratic candidates and causes across the country in 2014. The fundraising letters practically write themselves.
If Sebelius does decide to run in 2014 — and that’s a big if — she could also help Roberts in his primary race, as Alex Roarty argued Wednesday. Roberts is running against Dr. Milton Wolf, a tea-party challenger, who has faced criticism from the party establishment for some outlandish remarks and is, ironically, President Obama’s cousin. With a high-profile Democrat on the ticket in November, Roberts could easily bring concerns about electability to the forefront, potentially derailing Wolf’s already uphill campaign.
Very little polling has been done in the race so far, but even an automated survey from Public Policy Polling showed Roberts with a 26-point lead over Wolf. The same survey, conducted in February, shows both Republicans defeating Sebelius in a hypothetical fall matchup in a state Obama lost by almost 22 points last year.
This isn’t the first time Sebelius has been mentioned as a potential Senate candidate. She was encouraged by Democrats to run for then-Sen. Sam Brownback’s seat in 2010, when he ran for governor, but ultimately decided to continue her work with the Obama administration.
After months of dealing with the fallout surrounding the issues with HealthCare.gov, it seems unlikely that Sebelius would jump into what promises to be a nasty race against Roberts and national Republicans. Friends told the The Times they “seriously doubted” that she would run.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee would not comment on a possible Sebelius campaign.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."