You May Be Surprised By The States That Support Pre-K

Interactive: Obama’s universal pre-K plan is meeting resistance in Congress—but in the states, both parties support early childhood programs.

WOODBOURNE, NY - SEPTEMBER 20: Children eat breakfast at the federally-funded Head Start Program school on September 20, 2012 in Woodbourne, New York. The school provides early education, nutrition and health services to 311 children from birth through age 5 from low-income families in Sullivan County, one of the poorest counties in the state of New York. The children receive 2/3 of their daily nutritional needs through meals, which include breakfast, lunch and snack, that are prepared at the school and served family-style in classrooms. The county Head Start program was expanded with a $1 million grant from President Obama's 2009 stimulus bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Head Start, administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is the longest-running early education program for children of low-income families in the United States. 
Getty Images
Amy Sullivan and Brian Mcgill
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Amy Sullivan Brian McGill
April 17, 2014, 2:06 p.m.

When Pres­id­ent Obama called for uni­ver­sal ac­cess to pre-K pro­grams in his 2014 State of the Uni­on ad­dress, view­ers could have been for­giv­en for think­ing this was just an­oth­er big gov­ern­ment ini­ti­at­ive that only a lib­er­al could love. But in fact, a look at in­vest­ments in pre-K edu­ca­tion at the state level shows that fund­ing is up around the coun­try—and that some crim­son red states like South Car­o­lina and Mis­sis­sippi are lead­ing the way. 

The Edu­ca­tion Com­mis­sion of the States ana­lyzed state data on pre-K fund­ing for the 2013-2014 fisc­al year and found that of the 40 states that provide state-sup­por­ted pro­grams for 4-year-olds, 30 of them (plus the Dis­trict of Columbia) in­creased their fund­ing for these pro­grams. And con­trary to what you might ex­pect, those in­creases don’t fol­low a par­tic­u­lar par­tis­an pat­tern. (Scroll over the in­ter­act­ive map to see an in­di­vidu­al state’s pre-K fund­ing level and how much it has in­creased or de­creased.)

That’s in part be­cause some of the most con­ser­vat­ive states in the coun­try have had the hard­est time budging stub­bornly low edu­ca­tion scores. It’s not dis­sim­il­ar from the situ­ation a few years ago in which South Car­o­lina de­cided to deal with a high teen preg­nancy rate by giv­ing com­pre­hens­ive sex edu­ca­tion—not ab­stin­ence-only—a try. 

And there’s an­oth­er prac­tic­al reas­on for con­ser­vat­ives to em­brace pre-K edu­ca­tion. Ad­voc­ates of early child­hood in­ter­ven­tions have al­ways made the mor­al ar­gu­ment that it’s the just thing to do in or­der to al­low chil­dren of all back­grounds to enter school on a level play­ing field. But now they also lay out the cost-be­ne­fit ana­lys­is: Spend money now or spend a lot more money later. Giv­en that poor chil­dren with lower levels of edu­ca­tion­al at­tain­ment are most likely to end up in the crim­in­al justice sys­tem or re­quir­ing so­cial ser­vice as­sist­ance, re­search­ers have de­term­ined that every dol­lar in­ves­ted in early child­hood edu­ca­tion saves a min­im­um of $7 later on.

A few in­ter­est­ing de­vel­op­ments in the states:

  • Mas­sachu­setts doubled its in­vest­ment in pre-K for the 2013-2014 fisc­al year in or­der to re­duce the waitl­ist of chil­dren wait­ing for spots in pro­grams, a num­ber that had reached nearly 15,000.
  • South Car­o­lina in­creased its fund­ing by al­most 80 per­cent in or­der to ex­tend early child­hood pro­grams to 17 ad­di­tion­al school dis­tricts in the state.
  • Min­nesota is now of­fer­ing schol­ar­ships for pre-school age chil­dren whose fam­ily’s in­come is low enough to qual­i­fy—those schol­ar­ships for private pro­grams are in ad­di­tion to the Head Start op­tions already avail­able.
  • New Mex­ico’s Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Susana Mar­tinez signed a bill last spring that will use money from the state’s to­bacco set­tle­ment to fund early child­care and edu­ca­tion pro­grams.

It’s im­port­ant to note that the pro­grams in­cluded in this data are just those that serve 4-year-olds. Many edu­ca­tion re­search­ers be­lieve that in­ter­ven­tions should start even earli­er, with school-based pro­grams be­gin­ning at age 3, and vol­un­tary home-based in­ter­ven­tions as early as in­fancy. Even so, the trend lines point to­ward more fed­er­al and state sup­port of early edu­ca­tion—wheth­er you live in a state that’s blue, red, purple, or polka-dot­ted. 

What We're Following See More »
TIME TO SPLIT
House Passes CR, Sends Bill to President’s Desk
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
CAN’T NAME ONE WORLD LEADER
Gary Johnson Stumbles Again
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
GOES TO PRESIDENT
Senate Approves Bill to Preserve Rape Kits
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Wednesday approved legislation ensuring sexual assault survivors in federal criminal cases have access to forensic evidence collection kits, sending the bill to President Obama's desk. The legislation, known as the Survivors’ Bill of Rights Act, was passed by unanimous consent as lawmakers prepare to leave Washington until after the election. The House passed the measure earlier this month."

Source:
2-MONTH GIG OR 8-YEAR GIG?
Alec Baldwin to Play Trump on ‘SNL’
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS
FOUR-POINT LEAD IN FOUR-WAY RACE
Reuters/Ipsos Shows Clinton Ahead by 6
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

In one of the first polls released since Monday night's debate, a Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump 44%-38%. When third-party candidates are thrown into the mix, Clinton's share of the vote drops to 42%, with Gary Johnson picking up 7% and Jill Stein at 2%.

Source:
×