You May Be Surprised By The States That Support Pre-K

Interactive: Obama’s universal pre-K plan is meeting resistance in Congress—but in the states, both parties support early childhood programs.

WOODBOURNE, NY - SEPTEMBER 20: Children eat breakfast at the federally-funded Head Start Program school on September 20, 2012 in Woodbourne, New York. The school provides early education, nutrition and health services to 311 children from birth through age 5 from low-income families in Sullivan County, one of the poorest counties in the state of New York. The children receive 2/3 of their daily nutritional needs through meals, which include breakfast, lunch and snack, that are prepared at the school and served family-style in classrooms. The county Head Start program was expanded with a $1 million grant from President Obama's 2009 stimulus bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Head Start, administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is the longest-running early education program for children of low-income families in the United States. 
Getty Images
Amy Sullivan and Brian Mcgill
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Amy Sullivan Brian McGill
April 17, 2014, 2:06 p.m.

When Pres­id­ent Obama called for uni­ver­sal ac­cess to pre-K pro­grams in his 2014 State of the Uni­on ad­dress, view­ers could have been for­giv­en for think­ing this was just an­oth­er big gov­ern­ment ini­ti­at­ive that only a lib­er­al could love. But in fact, a look at in­vest­ments in pre-K edu­ca­tion at the state level shows that fund­ing is up around the coun­try—and that some crim­son red states like South Car­o­lina and Mis­sis­sippi are lead­ing the way. 

The Edu­ca­tion Com­mis­sion of the States ana­lyzed state data on pre-K fund­ing for the 2013-2014 fisc­al year and found that of the 40 states that provide state-sup­por­ted pro­grams for 4-year-olds, 30 of them (plus the Dis­trict of Columbia) in­creased their fund­ing for these pro­grams. And con­trary to what you might ex­pect, those in­creases don’t fol­low a par­tic­u­lar par­tis­an pat­tern. (Scroll over the in­ter­act­ive map to see an in­di­vidu­al state’s pre-K fund­ing level and how much it has in­creased or de­creased.)

That’s in part be­cause some of the most con­ser­vat­ive states in the coun­try have had the hard­est time budging stub­bornly low edu­ca­tion scores. It’s not dis­sim­il­ar from the situ­ation a few years ago in which South Car­o­lina de­cided to deal with a high teen preg­nancy rate by giv­ing com­pre­hens­ive sex edu­ca­tion—not ab­stin­ence-only—a try. 

And there’s an­oth­er prac­tic­al reas­on for con­ser­vat­ives to em­brace pre-K edu­ca­tion. Ad­voc­ates of early child­hood in­ter­ven­tions have al­ways made the mor­al ar­gu­ment that it’s the just thing to do in or­der to al­low chil­dren of all back­grounds to enter school on a level play­ing field. But now they also lay out the cost-be­ne­fit ana­lys­is: Spend money now or spend a lot more money later. Giv­en that poor chil­dren with lower levels of edu­ca­tion­al at­tain­ment are most likely to end up in the crim­in­al justice sys­tem or re­quir­ing so­cial ser­vice as­sist­ance, re­search­ers have de­term­ined that every dol­lar in­ves­ted in early child­hood edu­ca­tion saves a min­im­um of $7 later on.

A few in­ter­est­ing de­vel­op­ments in the states:

  • Mas­sachu­setts doubled its in­vest­ment in pre-K for the 2013-2014 fisc­al year in or­der to re­duce the waitl­ist of chil­dren wait­ing for spots in pro­grams, a num­ber that had reached nearly 15,000.
  • South Car­o­lina in­creased its fund­ing by al­most 80 per­cent in or­der to ex­tend early child­hood pro­grams to 17 ad­di­tion­al school dis­tricts in the state.
  • Min­nesota is now of­fer­ing schol­ar­ships for pre-school age chil­dren whose fam­ily’s in­come is low enough to qual­i­fy—those schol­ar­ships for private pro­grams are in ad­di­tion to the Head Start op­tions already avail­able.
  • New Mex­ico’s Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Susana Mar­tinez signed a bill last spring that will use money from the state’s to­bacco set­tle­ment to fund early child­care and edu­ca­tion pro­grams.

It’s im­port­ant to note that the pro­grams in­cluded in this data are just those that serve 4-year-olds. Many edu­ca­tion re­search­ers be­lieve that in­ter­ven­tions should start even earli­er, with school-based pro­grams be­gin­ning at age 3, and vol­un­tary home-based in­ter­ven­tions as early as in­fancy. Even so, the trend lines point to­ward more fed­er­al and state sup­port of early edu­ca­tion—wheth­er you live in a state that’s blue, red, purple, or polka-dot­ted. 

What We're Following See More »
KIM CALLS TRUMP A “DOTARD”
North Korea Threatens H-Bomb Test Over Pacific
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"North Korea said on Friday it might test a hydrogen bomb over the Pacific Ocean after President Donald Trump vowed to destroy the reclusive country, with leader Kim Jong Un promising to make Trump pay dearly for his threats. Kim did not specify what action he would take against the United States or Trump, whom he called a 'mentally deranged U.S. dotard' in the latest bout of insults the two leaders have traded in recent weeks."

Source:
INFORMS CONGRESS RE: EXECUTIVE ORDER
Trump Makes Good on Promise of New North Korea Sanctions
3 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump this afternoon announced another round of sanctions on North Korea, calling the regime "a continuing threat." The executive order, which Trump relayed to Congress, bans any ship or plane that has visited North Korea from visiting the United States within 180 days. The order also authorizes sanctions on any financial institution doing business with North Korea, and permits the secretaries of State and the Treasury to sanction any person involved in trading with North Korea, operating a port there, or involved in a variety of industries there.

SOUTH KOREA WILL SEND AID
Trump Promises More Sanctions on North Korea
3 days ago
THE LATEST

In response to a reporter's question, President Trump said "he’ll be looking to impose further financial penalties on North Korea over its nuclear and ballistic tests. ... The U.N. has passed two resolutions recently aimed at squeezing the North Korean economy by cutting off oil, labor and exports to the nation." Meanwhile, the Guardian reports that South Korea's unification ministry is sending an $8m aid package aimed at infants and pregnant women in North Korea. The "humanitarian gesture [is] at odds with calls by Japan and the US for unwavering economic and diplomatic pressure on Pyongyang."

Source:
HIGHLIGHT ISSUES FACING KIDS
FLOTUS to Speak at UN Luncheon
4 days ago
THE LATEST
PRESSES CASE FOR REFORMS
Trump Meets with UN Leaders
4 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump on Tuesday night met with UN Secretary Guterres and President of the General Assembly Miroslav Lajcak. In both cases, as per releases from the White House, Trump pressed them on the need to reform the UN bureaucracy.

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login