Tobacco Lobby Opens a New Playbook for E-Cigarettes

Hoping to avoid past mistakes, companies won’t oppose some regulations.

MIAMI, FL - FEBRUARY 20: Julia Boyle enjoys an electronic cigarette at the Vapor Shark store on February 20, 2014 in Miami, Florida. As the popularity of E- cigarettes continue to grow, leading U.S. tobacco companies such as Altria Group Inc. the maker of Marlboro cigarettes are annoucing plans to launch their own e-cigarettes as they start to pose a small but growing competitive threat to traditional smokes. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin
April 17, 2014, 3:27 p.m.

One e-ci­gar­ette maker mar­kets a fla­vor called “Con­gress,” with a web­site dis­play­ing a photo of the Cap­it­ol and de­scrib­ing the taste as “re­fined to­bacco.”

To some, it might evoke the smoke-filled rooms of yore. But “vap­ing” is not smoking, and the de­bate over reg­u­lat­ing e-ci­gar­ettes is not ne­ces­sar­ily an­oth­er to­bacco war.

As to­bacco com­pan­ies jockey to ex­pand their e-ci­gar­ette busi­ness, they’re us­ing an up­dated lob­by­ing play­book that drops op­pos­i­tion to reg­u­la­tions and em­braces the pro­hib­i­tion of sales to minors, in­dustry lob­by­ists say.

“The com­pan­ies are all really walk­ing gingerly,” said one to­bacco lob­by­ist, who spoke on the con­di­tion of an­onym­ity in or­der to be can­did. “People are loath to make the mis­takes of the past. This is al­most a clean sheet.”

In­deed, few in­dus­tries have been beaten up more thor­oughly than to­bacco. The in­dustry’s abil­ity to op­pose reg­u­la­tion — the 1988 ban of smoking on air­lines, for ex­ample, cham­pioned by then-Rep. Dick Durbin — has been ser­i­ously eroded by a mult­i­bil­lion-dol­lar law­suit set­tle­ment, a sem­in­al to­bacco bill passed in 2009, and years of bad pub­li­city.

“We are try­ing to get as far away from that play­book as we can,” said an­oth­er to­bacco lob­by­ist, re­fer­ring to the in­dustry’s repu­ta­tion as de­fend­er of a harm­ful product.

The new play­book, em­braced by some of the lar­ger play­ers in the in­dustry, is a clear move to­ward a “join ‘em” strategy. “I think it’s not a mat­ter of stay­ing out of the crosshairs of reg­u­lat­ors,” one lob­by­ist said. “It’s a mat­ter of work­ing with them.”

The shift in tac­tics comes as a small but in­flu­en­tial group of Demo­crat­ic law­makers, in­clud­ing Durbin, now the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Demo­crat, press for fur­ther reg­u­la­tion of e-ci­gar­ettes, which are man­u­fac­tured both by large to­bacco com­pan­ies and smal­ler, in­de­pend­ent firms. This week Durbin, Rep. Henry Wax­man of Cali­for­nia, and oth­er Demo­crat­ic law­makers is­sued a re­port that called for reg­u­lat­ors to ban the sale of e-ci­gar­ettes to minors and ad­opt a re­quire­ment for age veri­fic­a­tion.

To­bacco com­pan­ies re­acted, es­sen­tially, with a col­lect­ive yawn. Since the 2009 Fam­ily Smoking Pre­ven­tion and To­bacco Con­trol Act, when Al­tria Group, own­er of Philip Mor­ris USA, began to forge the reg­u­la­tion-friendly ap­proach, oth­er com­pan­ies like Reyn­olds Amer­ic­an and Lor­il­lard have be­gun to ad­opt the strategy.

“We have a vis­ion for mar­ket lead­er­ship by look­ing at trans­form­ing the in­dustry,” Reyn­olds spokes­man Richard Smith said. “One im­port­ant pil­lar is re­du­cing the youth to­bacco use — from the top down, that is a ma­jor pri­or­ity for us.”

While it might sound coun­ter­in­tu­it­ive for a com­pany to em­brace reg­u­la­tions, it may help the bot­tom line by pro­tect­ing ex­ist­ing mar­kets.

“Es­sen­tially this is a big vic­tory for the big to­bacco com­pan­ies,” said Bo­ston Uni­versity School of Pub­lic Health pro­fess­or Mi­chael Siegel, speak­ing of to­bacco reg­u­la­tion. “They can claim cor­rectly that they com­ply with FDA stand­ards. And it also de­tracts Con­gress from passing real reg­u­la­tion that would deal with to­bacco.”

The Demo­crat­ic law­makers say they’re fol­low­ing a dual-track ap­proach, push­ing for tough­er reg­u­la­tions — a pro­posed reg­u­la­tion is cur­rently stalled at the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget — as well as spon­sor­ing le­gis­la­tion.

Sen. Bar­bara Box­er of Cali­for­nia in­tro­duced, along with six oth­er Demo­crats, a bill that pro­hib­its mar­ket­ing e-ci­gar­ettes to minors. Rep. Eliza­beth Esty of Con­necti­c­ut in­tro­duced com­pan­ion le­gis­la­tion in the House. It is still un­clear how the bills may fare mov­ing for­ward.

Mean­while, the Demo­crat­ic au­thors of the re­port dis­pute the no­tion that man­u­fac­tur­ers are keep­ing e-ci­gar­ettes out of minors’ hands. In­deed, one com­pany used ad­vert­ise­ments fea­tur­ing Cap’n Crunch car­toons.

“I am deeply dis­turbed that e-ci­gar­ette com­pan­ies are mim­ick­ing tac­tics that to­bacco com­pan­ies used in the past to glam­or­ize smoking for youth,” said Sen. Jay Rock­e­feller, a West Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat, in a state­ment.

Asked wheth­er he was con­cerned that the strategy could back­fire, and the reg­u­la­tions could hurt the com­pan­ies, one lob­by­ist answered in the af­firm­at­ive.

“These are people who have a suc­cess­ful his­tory and they’re go­ing to keep go­ing. From their per­spect­ive it prob­ably is the same play­book,” he said. “But the proof is in the pud­ding.”

What We're Following See More »
Clinton Foundation Staffers Steered Biz to Bill
3 hours ago

"Two chief fundraisers for the Clinton Foundation pressed corporate donors to steer business opportunities to former President Bill Clinton as well, according to a hacked memo published Wednesday by WikiLeaks. The November 2011 memo from Douglas Band, at the time a top aide to Mr. Clinton, outlines extensive fundraising efforts that Mr. Band and a partner deployed on behalf of the Clinton Foundation and how that work sometimes translated into large speaking fees and other paid work for Mr. Clinton."

Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
11 hours ago
House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
12 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

Clinton Super PAC Enters the House Fray
17 hours ago

Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.

House to Vote on Iran Sanctions Renewal in Lame Duck
17 hours ago

Republican House leaders are planning on taking up a vote to renew the Iran Sanctions Act as soon as the lame-duck session begins in mid-November. The law, which expires on Dec. 31, permits a host of sanctions against Iran's industries, defense, and government. The renewal will likely pass the House, but its status is unclear once it reaches the Senate, and a spokesman from the White House refused to say whether President Obama would sign it into law.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.