Tobacco Lobby Opens a New Playbook for E-Cigarettes

Hoping to avoid past mistakes, companies won’t oppose some regulations.

MIAMI, FL - FEBRUARY 20: Julia Boyle enjoys an electronic cigarette at the Vapor Shark store on February 20, 2014 in Miami, Florida. As the popularity of E- cigarettes continue to grow, leading U.S. tobacco companies such as Altria Group Inc. the maker of Marlboro cigarettes are annoucing plans to launch their own e-cigarettes as they start to pose a small but growing competitive threat to traditional smokes. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin
April 17, 2014, 3:27 p.m.

One e-ci­gar­ette maker mar­kets a fla­vor called “Con­gress,” with a web­site dis­play­ing a photo of the Cap­it­ol and de­scrib­ing the taste as “re­fined to­bacco.”

To some, it might evoke the smoke-filled rooms of yore. But “vap­ing” is not smoking, and the de­bate over reg­u­lat­ing e-ci­gar­ettes is not ne­ces­sar­ily an­oth­er to­bacco war.

As to­bacco com­pan­ies jockey to ex­pand their e-ci­gar­ette busi­ness, they’re us­ing an up­dated lob­by­ing play­book that drops op­pos­i­tion to reg­u­la­tions and em­braces the pro­hib­i­tion of sales to minors, in­dustry lob­by­ists say.

“The com­pan­ies are all really walk­ing gingerly,” said one to­bacco lob­by­ist, who spoke on the con­di­tion of an­onym­ity in or­der to be can­did. “People are loath to make the mis­takes of the past. This is al­most a clean sheet.”

In­deed, few in­dus­tries have been beaten up more thor­oughly than to­bacco. The in­dustry’s abil­ity to op­pose reg­u­la­tion — the 1988 ban of smoking on air­lines, for ex­ample, cham­pioned by then-Rep. Dick Durbin — has been ser­i­ously eroded by a mult­i­bil­lion-dol­lar law­suit set­tle­ment, a sem­in­al to­bacco bill passed in 2009, and years of bad pub­li­city.

“We are try­ing to get as far away from that play­book as we can,” said an­oth­er to­bacco lob­by­ist, re­fer­ring to the in­dustry’s repu­ta­tion as de­fend­er of a harm­ful product.

The new play­book, em­braced by some of the lar­ger play­ers in the in­dustry, is a clear move to­ward a “join ‘em” strategy. “I think it’s not a mat­ter of stay­ing out of the crosshairs of reg­u­lat­ors,” one lob­by­ist said. “It’s a mat­ter of work­ing with them.”

The shift in tac­tics comes as a small but in­flu­en­tial group of Demo­crat­ic law­makers, in­clud­ing Durbin, now the Sen­ate’s No. 2 Demo­crat, press for fur­ther reg­u­la­tion of e-ci­gar­ettes, which are man­u­fac­tured both by large to­bacco com­pan­ies and smal­ler, in­de­pend­ent firms. This week Durbin, Rep. Henry Wax­man of Cali­for­nia, and oth­er Demo­crat­ic law­makers is­sued a re­port that called for reg­u­lat­ors to ban the sale of e-ci­gar­ettes to minors and ad­opt a re­quire­ment for age veri­fic­a­tion.

To­bacco com­pan­ies re­acted, es­sen­tially, with a col­lect­ive yawn. Since the 2009 Fam­ily Smoking Pre­ven­tion and To­bacco Con­trol Act, when Al­tria Group, own­er of Philip Mor­ris USA, began to forge the reg­u­la­tion-friendly ap­proach, oth­er com­pan­ies like Reyn­olds Amer­ic­an and Lor­il­lard have be­gun to ad­opt the strategy.

“We have a vis­ion for mar­ket lead­er­ship by look­ing at trans­form­ing the in­dustry,” Reyn­olds spokes­man Richard Smith said. “One im­port­ant pil­lar is re­du­cing the youth to­bacco use — from the top down, that is a ma­jor pri­or­ity for us.”

While it might sound coun­ter­in­tu­it­ive for a com­pany to em­brace reg­u­la­tions, it may help the bot­tom line by pro­tect­ing ex­ist­ing mar­kets.

“Es­sen­tially this is a big vic­tory for the big to­bacco com­pan­ies,” said Bo­ston Uni­versity School of Pub­lic Health pro­fess­or Mi­chael Siegel, speak­ing of to­bacco reg­u­la­tion. “They can claim cor­rectly that they com­ply with FDA stand­ards. And it also de­tracts Con­gress from passing real reg­u­la­tion that would deal with to­bacco.”

The Demo­crat­ic law­makers say they’re fol­low­ing a dual-track ap­proach, push­ing for tough­er reg­u­la­tions — a pro­posed reg­u­la­tion is cur­rently stalled at the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget — as well as spon­sor­ing le­gis­la­tion.

Sen. Bar­bara Box­er of Cali­for­nia in­tro­duced, along with six oth­er Demo­crats, a bill that pro­hib­its mar­ket­ing e-ci­gar­ettes to minors. Rep. Eliza­beth Esty of Con­necti­c­ut in­tro­duced com­pan­ion le­gis­la­tion in the House. It is still un­clear how the bills may fare mov­ing for­ward.

Mean­while, the Demo­crat­ic au­thors of the re­port dis­pute the no­tion that man­u­fac­tur­ers are keep­ing e-ci­gar­ettes out of minors’ hands. In­deed, one com­pany used ad­vert­ise­ments fea­tur­ing Cap’n Crunch car­toons.

“I am deeply dis­turbed that e-ci­gar­ette com­pan­ies are mim­ick­ing tac­tics that to­bacco com­pan­ies used in the past to glam­or­ize smoking for youth,” said Sen. Jay Rock­e­feller, a West Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat, in a state­ment.

Asked wheth­er he was con­cerned that the strategy could back­fire, and the reg­u­la­tions could hurt the com­pan­ies, one lob­by­ist answered in the af­firm­at­ive.

“These are people who have a suc­cess­ful his­tory and they’re go­ing to keep go­ing. From their per­spect­ive it prob­ably is the same play­book,” he said. “But the proof is in the pud­ding.”

What We're Following See More »
HAITIANS TO BE MOST AFFECTED
White House to End TPS Program
12 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is ending a humanitarian program that has allowed some 59,000 Haitians to live and work in the United States since an earthquake ravaged their country in 2010, Homeland Security officials said on Monday. Haitians with what is known as Temporary Protected Status will be expected to leave the United States by July 2019 or face deportation. ... About 320,000 people now benefit from the Temporary Protected Status program, which was signed into law by President George Bush in 1990."

Source:
MAKES PERMANENT A PREVIOUS INJUNCTION
Federal Judge Blocks Sanctuary Cities Order
24 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge on Monday permanently blocked President Donald Trump's executive order to cut funding from cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities. U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected the administration's argument that the executive order applies only to a relatively small pot of money and said Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress. The judge had previously made the same arguments in a ruling that put a temporary hold on the executive order."

Source:
HAD DRAWN SCRUTINY FOR LACK OF DONATIONS
Trump Shutting Down Charitable Foundation
26 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump's charitable foundation, which last year admitted violating federal rules on 'self-dealing,' is in the process of dissolving, according to newly filed documents reviewed by NBC News. The move fulfills a promise Trump made last December, when he said he would wind down the Donald J. Trump Foundation to avoid conflicts of interest. New York's attorney general ordered the foundation to stop soliciting contributions in October 2016." At year's end, the foundation had about $970,000 in assets.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Much Will the Air Force’s New Bomber Program Cost?
43 minutes ago
THE ANSWER

About $97 billion, according to a new Congressional Budget Office report.

Source:
DOES SCHOOL DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ASIANS?
DOJ Investigating Harvard for Its Affirmative Action Programs
47 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Department of Justice has opened an investigation into the use of race in Harvard University’s admissions practices and has accused the university of failing to cooperate with the probe, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal." The inquiry stems from a lawsuit filed in Boston in 2014, which claimed that the school intentionally discriminated against Asian Americans.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login