Democrats Revive the ‘War on Women’ Against Republican Senate Candidates

Michigan Republican Terri Lynn Land ridicules the attacks in her first TV ad.

A member of the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), Pro-Choice America protest with their 'Etch A Sketch' in hand protest outside a hotel in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
April 22, 2014, 10:29 a.m.

For­get job growth or the de­fi­cit. A pair of TV ads re­leased Tues­day sug­gests the 2014 elec­tions will dive head­first in­to a fierce de­bate over wo­men’s is­sues.

The new on-air missives came from a pair of mar­quee Sen­ate cam­paigns: Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mark Ud­all of Col­or­ado and Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate can­did­ate Terri Lynn Land of Michigan, both of whom are in com­pet­it­ive races in battle­ground states. And be­cause each is the first TV ad from either cam­paign, they will set the tone for the races’ next six months.

In Ud­all’s case, the in­cum­bent took aim at Rep. Cory Gard­ner’s pri­or sup­port of so-called per­son­hood le­gis­la­tion. The hard-hit­ting ad ac­cuses the GOP con­gress­man of op­pos­ing abor­tion rights in cases of rape and in­cest and of “cham­pi­on­ing an eight-year cru­sade to out­law com­mon forms of birth con­trol.”

“It comes down to re­spect,” a fe­male nar­rat­or says in the ad. “For wo­men, and our lives.”

The ad buy, ac­cord­ing to the cam­paign, is worth $500,000 spread over two weeks.

It’s not sur­pris­ing that Ud­all is tak­ing aim at Gard­ner’s po­s­i­tion on abor­tion rights and con­tra­cep­tion ac­cess: His cam­paign tele­graphed those at­tacks from the minute the Re­pub­lic­an un­ex­pec­tedly entered the race in Feb­ru­ary. Demo­crats suc­cess­fully used a so­cial-is­sue play­book in the last com­pet­it­ive Sen­ate race in cos­mo­pol­it­an Col­or­ado, when Mi­chael Ben­net (now chair­man of the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee) won a nar­row vic­tory in 2010, and Gard­ner him­self re­nounced his sup­port of per­son­hood le­gis­la­tion shortly after en­ter­ing his race.

It might sur­prise, however, that the cam­paign is go­ing neg­at­ive in April, an in­dic­a­tion of the danger Demo­crats be­lieve the well-fun­ded Gard­ner poses.

Neg­at­ive ads like Ud­all’s are part of a Demo­crat­ic polit­ic­al at­tack against Re­pub­lic­ans known as the “War on Wo­men,” a charge the party leveled with suc­cess in the 2012 elec­tions. And they ex­plain why Land’s cam­paign ran its own ad in Michigan, a spot de­signed to re­but charges that she’s in­sens­it­ive to wo­men’s is­sues.

“Con­gress­man Gary Peters and his bud­dies want you to be­lieve I’m wa­ging a war on wo­men,” Land says, speak­ing in­to the cam­era. “Really? Think about that for a mo­ment.”

Land then stops talk­ing as el­ev­at­or mu­sic plays in the back­ground, as she drinks from a cof­fee mug and checks her watch.

“I’m Terri Lynn Land and I ap­prove this mes­sage be­cause, as a wo­man, I might know a little bit more about wo­men than Gary Peters,” she said.

The ad is one of the most vis­ible push­backs yet from Re­pub­lic­ans, who be­lieve they were hurt badly two years ago in part be­cause the party mustered only a muted coun­ter­ar­gu­ment to Demo­crat­ic at­tacks geared to­ward fe­male voters. (They also had to deal with fal­lout from nom­in­ee Todd Akin’s con­tro­ver­sial “le­git­im­ate rape” com­ments on abor­tion in the 2012 Mis­souri Sen­ate race, and In­di­ana Sen­ate nom­in­ee Richard Mour­dock’s op­pos­i­tion to abor­tion for rape vic­tims.) And it comes as Demo­crats prom­ise to re­vive the at­tacks this year, in par­tic­u­lar fo­cus­ing on Re­pub­lic­ans who have sup­por­ted Per­son­hood le­gis­la­tion in the past.

Demo­crats have said they need to dwell on such is­sues in part to drive up turnout among single wo­men, a key con­stitu­ency that votes in dis­pro­por­tion­ately few­er num­bers dur­ing midterm elec­tions.

Not all early TV ads from Sen­ate can­did­ates men­tion wo­men’s is­sues: In many of the red states in play this year, most of the dis­cus­sion has fo­cused on more fin­ic­ally themed is­sues like Obama­care, So­cial Se­cur­ity, and Medi­care. But at least in a pair of blue states, 2014 is pick­ing up right where 2012 left off. Wel­come to the War Over Wo­men.

What We're Following See More »
CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
48 minutes ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
59 minutes ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
2 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
2 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."

EPA Didn’t Warn Flint Residents Soon Enough
2 hours ago

According to a new report, the Environmental Protection Agency waited too long before informing the residents of Flint, Mich. that their water was contaminated with lead. Written by the EPA's inspector general, it places blame squarely at the foot of the agency itself, saying it had enough information by June 2015 to issue an emergency order. However, the order wasn't issued until the end of January 2016.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.