How Sriracha Became a Political Prop

It’s an immigrant-owned, widely popular product facing regulation from big, small-town government.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
April 23, 2014, 9:55 a.m.

Ir­windale, Cal­if., has had enough of Sri­r­acha. Amer­ic­ans con­sumers are ob­sessed with it. And politi­cians are sens­ing an op­por­tun­ity.

Earli­er this month, the Ir­windale City Coun­cil de­clared Huy Fong Foods, the com­pany that man­u­fac­tures the gar­licky hot sauce, a pub­lic nuis­ance (Cla­ri­fic­a­tion: The city tent­at­ively de­clared the fact­ory a pub­lic nuis­ance in a un­an­im­ous de­cision two weeks ago. It will vote again to fi­nal­ize the meas­ure in two weeks). As much as liv­ing next to a bakery can be won­der­ful, liv­ing next to a hot-sauce fact­ory has proven to be grat­ing. Ac­cord­ing to the coun­cil res­ol­u­tion, neigh­bors have com­plained about “nosebleeds, swollen glands, a burn­ing sen­sa­tion of the throat and eyes, and head­aches, among oth­er symp­toms.”

If the de­clar­a­tion is fi­nal­ized, Huy Fong has un­til Ju­ly 22 to at­ten­u­ate the odor. If it doesn’t, the city can in­ter­vene and will bill Huy Fong the costs via a li­en on its prop­erty. Rather than reen­gin­eer pro­duc­tion, own­er Dav­id Tran tells the Los Angeles Times he’s think­ing of mov­ing the fact­ory.

That news quickly hit the ears of politi­cians. And it’s easy to see why.

For one, Sri­r­acha is an Amer­ic­an dream story. Dav­id Tran, Huy Fong’s founder, is an im­mig­rant. His vis­ion, he told our sis­ter site Quartz, is “to make enough fresh chili sauce so that every­one who wants Huy Fong can have it. Noth­ing more.” He makes some $60 mil­lion worth of it every year.

It’s also an im­mensely pop­u­lar, nearly cult-wor­shiped brand to be as­so­ci­ated with. When the fact­ory tem­por­ar­ily shut down in Decem­ber 2013 after a court or­der, Sri­r­acha fans pan­icked. Homemade Sri­r­acha re­cipes pro­lif­er­ated. Head­lines de­clared “The Days of a Sri­r­acha Black Mar­ket Are Ap­proach­ing,” and offered “How to sur­vive the im­pend­ing Sri­r­acha short­age” guides.

That, com­bined with the nar­rat­ive of the little guy vs. big gov­ern­ment, has proven to be pure polit­ic­al cat­nip, es­pe­cially for Re­pub­lic­ans. Ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters, “the com­pany says it has more than two dozen in­vit­a­tions from of­fi­cials across the coun­try, sev­er­al in Texas.”

That in­cludes one from Rep. Tony Carde­n­as, D-Cal­if., who toured the Huy Fong fact­ory in an at­tempt to per­suade the com­pany to re­lo­cate to his dis­trict in the San Fernando Val­ley. An­oth­er came from Texas state Rep. Jason Vil­lal­ba, who wrote Tran, “You have worked too hard and have helped too many people to let gov­ern­ment bur­eau­crats shut down your thriv­ing busi­ness.”

The Cali­for­nia GOP has already made Sri­r­acha in­to a talk­ing point, with the Los Angeles chapter un­an­im­ously passing a res­ol­u­tion of solid­ar­ity with Huy Fong, and the chapter’s chair­man telling Fox News that Tran is “ba­sic­ally the story of Amer­ica.”

Here’s the text of their res­ol­u­tion:

Be it re­solved that the Re­pub­lic­an Party of Los Angeles County urges the City Coun­cil of Ir­windale to take such ac­tions as ne­ces­sary to keep Huy Fong Foods in Los Angeles County and,

There­fore, be it re­solved this 19th Day of April, 2014 that the Re­pub­lic­an Party stands with Sri­r­acha and sup­ports Huy Fong Foods as it con­tin­ues to grow, cre­ate jobs, and to bol­ster the loc­al eco­nomy.

The 2013 crisis was aver­ted, but the epis­ode surely only el­ev­ated the Sri­r­acha brand in the na­tion­al con­scious­ness. The in­vest­ig­at­ive news web­site Cal­Watch­ goes so far as to call the Sri­r­acha story “an elec­tion-year gift” for state Re­pub­lic­ans look­ing to ap­peal to Asi­an voters. Neel Kashkari, a Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate for gov­ernor, has a pe­ti­tion on his web­site to “tell Sri­r­acha’s lead­ers that we stand with them against big gov­ern­ment.”

In all, it’s a story about the little guy against the big, mean, (loc­al) gov­ern­ment. It’s also a chance for politi­cians to align them­selves with a pop­u­lar minor­ity-owned brand. It’s also a chance to lure a fact­ory that em­ploys 70 full-time work­ers in­to a dis­trict. In oth­er words, a talk­ing point with no down­side. Well, that is, un­til those politi­cians’ con­stitu­ents start com­plain­ing about the smell.

What We're Following See More »
Bill Murray Crashes White House Briefing Room
5 hours ago

In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.

CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
8 hours ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
8 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
9 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
9 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.