Remember Gary Johnson? He Wants to Run for President Again.

The libertarian governor is tilting at yet another windmill.

388141 02: New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson discusses the possibility of the legalization of drugs April 22, 2001 on NBC's 'Meet the Press' during a taping at the NBC studios in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Newsmakers)
National Journal
April 23, 2014, 12:18 p.m.

Every­one’s third-fa­vor­ite 2012 pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate is back in the ring.

In a Red­dit “Ask Me Any­thing” ses­sion on Tues­day, former New Mex­ico Gov. Gary John­son said he would like to run for pres­id­ent in 2016. He ran against Mitt Rom­ney and Barack Obama as a Liber­tari­an in 2012.

“Let’s skip the pleas­ant­ries and ask the ques­tion every­one wants to know the an­swer to. Will you be run­ning for pres­id­ent in 2016?” one Red­dit user asked John­son.

“I hope to be able to run in 2016,” John­son replied.

When asked which party he would run un­der — Liber­tari­an or Re­pub­lic­an — he said, “I would love run­ning as a Liber­tari­an be­cause I would have the least amount of ex­plain­ing to do.”

This news may be scoffable to some — after all, John­son earned just 1.2 mil­lion votes in 2012, or about 1 per­cent of the pop­u­lar vote. But he ran the most suc­cess­ful third-party cam­paign since Ral­ph Nader in 2000, and we all know how that one turned out.

And while not much may have changed between 2012 and 2016, it’s hard to un­der­es­tim­ate the seis­mic shift to­ward liber­tari­an­ism that the Re­pub­lic­an Party has un­der­gone in the past few years. Yes­ter­days Re­pub­lic­ans wouldn’t have dreamed of sup­port­ing state gay-mar­riage laws or med­ic­al marijuana. Now, the GOP’s big names are skirt­ing those is­sues, but not openly op­pos­ing them, either.

It’s worth re­mem­ber­ing that John­son was at the fore­front of both those is­sues. He’s long been a cru­sader for leg­al­ized marijuana, and he came out in fa­vor of same-sex mar­riage (al­beit not for its fed­er­al pro­tec­tion) long be­fore Pres­id­ent Obama did.

While so­cial is­sues hardly de­cide a pres­id­ency, it goes to show that the mor­als we con­sidered “pres­id­en­tial” yes­ter­day, we may find re­pug­nant to­mor­row. And if the 2016 Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­ee is as clue­less about con­nect­ing with young voters as Mitt Rom­ney was, a John­son can­did­acy might start look­ing a lot more ap­peal­ing.

What We're Following See More »
RARE STATEMENT FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE
Mueller Denies BuzzFeed Report About Trump Directing Cohen to Lie
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s office on Friday denied an explosive report by BuzzFeed News that his investigators had gathered evidence showing President Trump directed his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to Congress about a prospective business deal in Moscow. 'BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the special counsel’s office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,' said Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller."

Source:
SAYS NO REASON TO WORRY
Sen. Angus King Says He's Undergoing Prostate Cancer Treatment
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS
ABOUT THE BORDER
Trump to Make Announcement Saturday Afternoon
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
MORE PRESSURE ON WHITE HOUSE
NY Fed Chief Says Shutdown Could Cut Growth by 1%
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS
SCHIFF CALLS ALLEGATIONS THE MOST SERIOUS TO DATE
House Intel Will Probe BuzzFeed Report
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The top Democrats on the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees said they will investigate the allegations that President Donald Trump directed his former attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about negotiations in 2016 to build a Trump Tower in Moscow are true, as BuzzFeed News reported late Thursday. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said the allegations underlying the BuzzFeed report are “among the most serious to date” and indicated he will direct committee investigators to probe them."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login