Rand Paul has had a good year.
Last April, the Kentucky Republican made it onto Time’s list of the 100 most influential people with an endorsement from Sarah Palin, who noted that she “sent him some caribou jerky from Alaska” to help give him strength.
This year, Paul appears on the Time 100 again. But instead of getting an entry written by a politician on the decline, Paul’s endorsement comes from the lawmaker who leads the Republican Party in the Senate, and could well wind up as the chamber’s majority leader in less than a year.
Paul, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell writes, is “beating the bushes for anyone who prizes liberty, and he’s forcing people to rethink the Republican Party.” McConnell also got in a semi-veiled dig at one of Paul’s potential 2016 competitors, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, by praising Paul for not speaking ill of his fellow Republicans. McConnell’s come a long way from supporting Paul’s primary opponent in 2010. The Time entry itself is titled “The libertarian champion,” and is just about as raving a review as you’d ever see one politician give another.
It’s especially raving compared with how Paul endorsed McConnell for his Senate campaign this year. Because, while McConnell may need Paul in his reelection fight, Paul isn’t necessarily publicly pleading for the leader’s support.
In Paul’s telling, McConnell isn’t quite beating any shrubbery of freedom. When asked by Glenn Beck back in February why Paul was endorsing the minority leader in his GOP primary, Paul said he was going to campaign for McConnell because “he asked me when there was nobody else in the race.” Paul later clarified that he sees McConnell as “an important ally and a conservative voice in Washington.” Paul followed up that endorsement by dodging a question about it at a community forum last week in Kentucky.
In response to the Time 100 endorsement, a spokesperson for Rand Paul said that the senator “is excited to be a part of the national debate and is very appreciative of the kind words from his friend and colleague Sen. McConnell.”
As Paul spends more and more time crafting his national image ahead of a possible presidential campaign, it’s clear that he’s interested in more power and influence than McConnell could possibly give him in the Senate. But McConnell, in his courtship of the libertarian wing of his party, still has a lot to gain from Paul. Writing glowing tributes in a major national magazine may be a good start.
This article was updated with comment on Time 100 from Sen. Paul’s office.
What We're Following See More »
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."