We’re Heading for a Showdown Over Deportations

The Obama administration is expected to make “modest” changes, while Republicans are already up in arms.

LOS ANGELES, CA - JUNE 15: Students (L-R) Sarait Escorza, 23, Isabelle Vargas, 20, and Maricella Aguilar, 21, block the on ramp of US101 freeway during a demonstration by immigrant students for an end to deportations and urge relief by governmental agencies for those in deportation proceedings on June 15, 2012 in Los Angeles, California. In a policy change, the Obama administration said it will stop deporting young illegal immigrants who entered the United States as children if they meet certain requirements. 
Getty Images
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
Elahe Izad
April 24, 2014, 9:49 a.m.

The pro­spects for im­mig­ra­tion re­form have come to a stand­still. And with the heat in­creas­ing on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion from anti-de­port­a­tion ad­voc­ates, something is about to give.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion is ex­pec­ted to an­nounce the res­ults of the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment’s de­port­a­tion policy re­view with­in the com­ing weeks, the The Wall Street Journ­al re­ports. The out­come will be much more mod­est than what many act­iv­ists have been clam­or­ing for: Rather than de­fer­ring de­port­a­tion pro­ceed­ings for mil­lions here il­leg­ally, ac­tions un­der re­view could af­fect a smal­ler num­ber of people who have been in the U.S. for a long time, but have minor or no crim­in­al vi­ol­a­tions. Last year, such people rep­res­en­ted 50,000 de­port­a­tions.

Ex­pect such re­lief to be wel­comed by ad­voc­ates, but still leave many dis­sat­is­fied that it has not gone far enough.

On the flip side, such ac­tions — really, any de­port­a­tion ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion — will be used as fur­ther am­muni­tion in the de­fense against do­ing any­thing on im­mig­ra­tion policy this year. Re­pub­lic­ans, even those who have spoken in fa­vor of im­mig­ra­tion re­form, have said it can’t hap­pen while law­makers don’t trust the pres­id­ent to en­force laws already on the books.

Want to get an in­dic­a­tion of where this is all head­ing? Just take a look at this let­ter, signed by 22 Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, sent to Obama on Thursday. They write, “Ac­cord­ing to re­ports, the changes un­der con­sid­er­a­tion would rep­res­ent a near com­plete aban­don­ment of ba­sic im­mig­ra­tion en­force­ment and dis­card the rule of law and the no­tion that the United States has en­force­able bor­ders.”

The Re­pub­lic­ans also cri­ti­cize Obama for dir­ect­ing pre­vi­ous changes, such as pro­sec­utori­al dis­cre­tion and al­low­ing the de­fer­ral of de­port­a­tion pro­ceed­ings for so-called dream­ers. “Your ac­tions demon­strate an as­ton­ish­ing dis­reg­ard for the Con­sti­tu­tion, the rule of law, and the rights of Amer­ic­an cit­izens and leg­al res­id­ents,” they write.

Strong ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion on de­port­a­tion policy could eas­ily be in­ter­preted as “com­pletely writ­ing off im­mig­ra­tion re­form un­til 2016,” Theresa Car­din­al Brown, the im­mig­ra­tion-policy dir­ect­or at the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter, pre­vi­ously told me. But mod­est ac­tion — com­bined with few le­gis­lat­ive cal­en­dar days left in this midterm elec­tion year and sharp rhet­or­ic about pres­id­en­tial over­reach — means the like­li­hood that re­form will hap­pen this year is pretty low. Hav­ing the two sides agree on how a phone call went is even a tall or­der when dis­cuss­ing im­mig­ra­tion.

What We're Following See More »
PLANS TO CURB ITS POWER
Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
3 days ago
BREAKING
WOULD HAVE REPLACED FLYNN
Harward Turns Down NSC Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."

Source:
REVERSES OBAMA RULE
House Votes to Let States Block Planned Parenthood Funds
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House passed a resolution Thursday re-opening the door for states to block Planned Parenthood from receiving some federal funds. The measure, which passed 230-188, would reverse a last-minute rule from the Obama administration that said conservative states can't block the women's health and abortion provider from receiving family planning dollars under the Title X program."

Source:
FORMER PROSECUTOR
Alexander Acosta to Get Nod for Labor
4 days ago
THE LATEST
12:30 PRESS CONFERENCE
New Labor Secretary Announcement Coming
4 days ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login