Sen. Elizabeth Warren is attracting plenty of attention this week with a new book out that many observers speculate is a place-setter for a potential 2016 presidential run. While the Massachusetts Democrat has said repeatedly that she’s not running, some think she could capitalize on a restive Democratic base’s discontent with presumptive frontrunner Hillary Clinton and become, as the New Republic dubbed Warren, “Hillary’s nightmare.”
Matt Bai of Yahoo! has a reality check on the Warren bubble Thursday. But here are five more reasons anyone running to the left of Clinton in a 2016 Democratic primary may turn around to find their army gone:
1) A Fox News poll from April found that just 6 percent of self-described liberals think Clinton is “too conservative.” That’s compared with 13 percent who think she’s too liberal.
2) A CNN poll from March asked Democrats and independents who lean Democratic which of a list of potential candidates were they most likely to support. Almost three-quarters of liberals chose Clinton. Warren’s name was not on the list; 4 percent chose “someone else.”
3) An ABC News/Washington Post poll from January found that 92 percent of liberal Democrats had a favorable opinion of Clinton, including 74 percent who had a strongly favorable opinion.
4) A Pew Research Center/USA Today poll from January found that 87 percent of liberal Democrats said they want Clinton to run for president. Nearly as many — 83 percent — said it was likely they would vote for her.
5) A Quinnipiac Poll in January asked Democrats and Democratic leaners for whom they would vote from a list of potential candidates. Sixty-five percent chose Clinton, while 7 percent chose Warren. Four out of five liberals said they thought Clinton would make a good president.
Bottom line: There simply isn’t much room to Clinton’s left, and most of the Democratic base seems to pretty happy with Clinton.
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.