Russia rejected as “ungrounded” an island archipelago’s challenge to Moscow’s compliance with nuclear disarmament commitments, RIA Novosti reports.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich on Monday voiced surprise that his country was targeted in last week’s legal action by the Marshall Islands, which played host to dozens of U.S. nuclear tests in the 1940s and 1950s. In cases filed at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, the island chain demanded faster disarmament steps by all nine known and presumed nuclear-capable nations.
“Russia continues to demonstrate its effective and consistent approach toward the implementation of its commitments under the [Nuclear] Nonproliferation Treaty,” Lukashevich said in released comments.
He argued that Moscow has significantly curbed its atomic arsenal under deals reached with other powers.
“Russia has reduced its strategic [long-range] nuclear potential by more than 80 percent and its nonstrategic nuclear weapons by three-quarters from their peak numbers,” Reuters quoted the foreign ministry as saying.
“We are convinced that the filing of ungrounded lawsuits does not help the creation of favorable conditions for further international efforts in the sphere of control over armaments and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction,” Lukashevich added in the RIA Novosti article.
The foreign ministry added, though, that “the international community has made no serious efforts” in 45 years to meet the nonproliferation treaty’s call for a successor pact allowing for “complete disarmament under strict and effective international control,” Reuters reported.
Moscow “is open to interaction with its NPT partners with the aim of seeking the most effective paths to realization of the treaty,” according to a ministry statement.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."