Russia Rebuffs Nuclear-Arms Lawsuit by Marshall Islands

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
April 29, 2014, 7:54 a.m.

Rus­sia re­jec­ted as “un­groun­ded” an is­land ar­chipelago’s chal­lenge to Mo­scow’s com­pli­ance with nuc­le­ar dis­arm­a­ment com­mit­ments, RIA Nov­osti re­ports.

Rus­si­an For­eign Min­istry spokes­man Al­ex­an­der Lukashev­ich on Monday voiced sur­prise that his coun­try was tar­geted in last week’s leg­al ac­tion by the Mar­shall Is­lands, which played host to dozens of U.S. nuc­le­ar tests in the 1940s and 1950s. In cases filed at the In­ter­na­tion­al Court of Justice in The Hag­ue, Neth­er­lands, the is­land chain de­man­ded faster dis­arm­a­ment steps by all nine known and pre­sumed nuc­le­ar-cap­able na­tions.

“Rus­sia con­tin­ues to demon­strate its ef­fect­ive and con­sist­ent ap­proach to­ward the im­ple­ment­a­tion of its com­mit­ments un­der the [Nuc­le­ar] Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty,” Lukashev­ich said in re­leased com­ments.

He ar­gued that Mo­scow has sig­ni­fic­antly curbed its atom­ic ar­sen­al un­der deals reached with oth­er powers.

“Rus­sia has re­duced its stra­tegic [long-range] nuc­le­ar po­ten­tial by more than 80 per­cent and its non­stra­tegic nuc­le­ar weapons by three-quar­ters from their peak num­bers,” Re­u­ters quoted the for­eign min­istry as say­ing.

“We are con­vinced that the fil­ing of un­groun­ded law­suits does not help the cre­ation of fa­vor­able con­di­tions for fur­ther in­ter­na­tion­al ef­forts in the sphere of con­trol over arma­ments and non-pro­lif­er­a­tion of weapons of mass de­struc­tion,” Lukashev­ich ad­ded in the RIA Nov­osti art­icle.

The for­eign min­istry ad­ded, though, that “the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity has made no ser­i­ous ef­forts” in 45 years to meet the non­pro­lif­er­a­tion treaty’s call for a suc­cessor pact al­low­ing for “com­plete dis­arm­a­ment un­der strict and ef­fect­ive in­ter­na­tion­al con­trol,” Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

Mo­scow “is open to in­ter­ac­tion with its NPT part­ners with the aim of seek­ing the most ef­fect­ive paths to real­iz­a­tion of the treaty,” ac­cord­ing to a min­istry state­ment.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
15 hours ago

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
16 hours ago

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
16 hours ago

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
19 hours ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."