GOP Defense Bill Pushes Back Against Proposed Nuclear-Modernization Delays

Multicolored vapor trails light up the night sky over Los Angeles following the launch of an unarmed Minuteman II intercontinental ballistic missiles from Vandenberg Air Force Base 150 miles to the north. House Armed Services Committee Republicans are pushing back against the Obama administration's plan to delay certain efforts to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
Add to Briefcase
Douglas P. Guarino
April 29, 2014, 10:58 a.m.

House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans are push­ing back against the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plans to delay se­lec­ted ef­forts to mod­ern­ize the U.S. nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al.

In their ver­sion of an­nu­al de­fense-au­thor­iz­a­tion le­gis­la­tion, which the pan­el re­leased Tues­day, com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans also con­tin­ued their so-far un­suc­cess­ful ef­forts to lim­it the De­fense Nuc­le­ar Fa­cil­it­ies Safety Board’s in­flu­ence on the U.S. weapons com­plex.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s fisc­al 2015 de­fense budget looks to delay the con­tro­ver­sial de­vel­op­ment of an in­ter­op­er­able war­head that could be used to re­place two sep­ar­ate war­heads fielded today by the Navy and Air Force.

Com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans have con­cerns with this post­pone­ment — as well as oth­er delays to mod­ern­iz­a­tion ef­forts — ac­cord­ing to the pan­el’s le­gis­la­tion.

“With the pro­posed de­fer­ral of the first in­ter­op­er­able war­head, the De­part­ment has con­cur­rently pro­posed to de­fer plans “¦ for a plutoni­um pit pro­duc­tion ca­pa­city of 50 to 80 pits per year,” the bill says. “The com­mit­tee be­lieves that wait­ing over 15 years to achieve a re­spons­ive nuc­le­ar in­fra­struc­ture is too great a risk to na­tion­al se­cur­ity.”

The bill, which is up for a vote in the House pan­el’s Stra­tegic Forces Sub­com­mit­tee on Wed­nes­day, would re­quire the En­ergy sec­ret­ary “to en­sure that the nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity en­ter­prise pro­duces at least 30 war re­serve pits dur­ing 2023, at least 50 war re­serve pits dur­ing 2026 and, dur­ing a pi­lot peri­od of at least 90 days dur­ing 2027, demon­strate the cap­ab­il­ity to pro­duce war re­serve pits at a rate suf­fi­cient to pro­duce 80 pits per year.”

Pits are the core of an atom­ic weapon.

The bill also pushes back against the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pro­posed delay to a planned cruise-mis­sile war­head mod­ern­iz­a­tion. The le­gis­la­tion would re­quire the En­ergy Sec­ret­ary “to de­liv­er a first pro­duc­tion unit for a nuc­le­ar war­head for the long-range stan­doff weapon not later than” 2025.

“The com­mit­tee be­lieves the pro­posed 3-year de­fer­ral of this cruise mis­sile is con­trary to the in­terests of na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” the bill says. “There­fore, the com­mit­tee re­com­mends this pro­vi­sion to en­sure war­head pro­duc­tion for this cruise mis­sile is de­ferred only one year.”

Com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans are also con­tinu­ing their le­gis­lat­ive ef­forts to lim­it the in­flu­ence of the De­fense Nuc­le­ar Fa­cil­it­ies Safety Board. The bill would man­date that the in­spect­or gen­er­al of the Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion also serve as in­spect­or gen­er­al of the safety board. It would ad­di­tion­ally lim­it the num­ber of board em­ploy­ees to 120.

Last year, the com­mit­tee’s ver­sion of the bill in­cluded a pro­vi­sion that would have en­abled the En­ergy sec­ret­ary to re­quest cost-be­ne­fit ana­lyses of any re­com­mend­a­tions the in­de­pend­ent safety board made. The lan­guage, along with a sim­il­ar pro­vi­sion in the pri­or year’s bill, was even­tu­ally dropped in con­fer­ence ne­go­ti­ations with the Sen­ate.

Demo­crats feared last year’s pro­vi­sion would have drained the safety board’s re­sources and in­hib­ited its abil­ity to con­duct im­port­ant re­views. Com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans, have ar­gued the safety board re­views sig­ni­fic­antly in­crease the cost of work across the nuc­le­ar-weapons com­plex.

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
6 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
9 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
10 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
14 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."

Trump Admits He’s Behind
14 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.