The Federal Communications Commission’s recent proposal to allow Internet service providers to charge websites for faster service is an “affront” to the open Internet, Sen. Al Franken said Tuesday.
The Minnesota Democrat sent FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler a letter blasting the net-neutrality regulations he introduced last week, saying the “fast lanes” undermine the core principles of net neutrality: openness and competition.
“Sanctioning pay-to-play arrangements would not preserve the Open Internet — it would destroy it,” wrote Franken, who is an outspoken supporter of net neutrality.
Such an arrangement would give “deep-pocketed” companies, such as Netflix or Facebook, an unfair advantage over small companies that would not be able to pay for faster service, he wrote.
“This proposal would create an online ‘fast lane’ for the highest bidder — shutting out small businesses and increasing costs for consumers,” Franken wrote.
Franken’s words echo the sentiments of many consumer-advocacy groups and liberal lawmakers, who have slammed the proposed regulations since they were introduced last week.
But Wheeler denies that his proposed rules would “gut” net neutrality, and he has promised to pursue stronger rules if these ones fall short.
“I believe this process will put us on track to have tough, enforceable Open Internet rules on the books in an expeditious manner, ending a decade of uncertainty and litigation,” Wheeler wrote in a blog post Tuesday.
The FCC first adopted net-neutrality rules in 2010, but a federal court struck them down in January. The original rules forbade Internet providers from blocking websites or discriminating against Internet traffic. Wheeler’s new proposal would still ban blocking, but would permit Internet providers to charge for faster speeds, as long as the arrangements are “commercially reasonable.”
The FCC’s five commissioners will vote to advance the proposal at the next open commission meeting on May 15. The commission will accept public comments on the new proposal before it is finalized.
What We're Following See More »
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."