In the last few months, the United States has pledged to Ukraine outspoken support, military food rations, and $1 billion.
But what Ukraine could really use during its standoff with Russia, its officials say, is help from American information technology companies.
The Ukrainian Embassy in the U.S. has launched a campaign aimed at Western businesses, urging them to increase their outsourcing services to Ukraine. “It’s high time for U.S. investors and IT companies to really discover Ukraine,” said Olexander Motsyk, the Ukrainian ambassador to the U.S., at a presentation at the embassy Tuesday night.
The event ran like a standard business pitch, with several economic and tech experts touting the benefits of outsourcing IT jobs. The embassy had partnered with TransparentBusiness, a “cloudsourcing” provider that allows managers in other countries to remotely monitor their contractors’ work in Ukraine. By growing this economic sector, Ukraine isn’t looking to become the next India, the evening’s featured speakers said, but rather the Silicon Valley of Europe.
The most memorable marketing tactic of the evening wasn’t touting cheaper tax incentives or reliable technology, however. It was something much more unusual: democracy.
“National economy is a matter of national survival,” Motsyk said. Posters of February’s Euromaidan protests hung in the room, and pamphlets for guests read “Support Democracy. Increase Your Profits. Cloudsource to Ukraine.”
At first glance, the slogan suggests Ukraine is trying to capitalize on a crisis. But in this specific crisis, that may not be such a bad idea. The Ukrainian economy is nearing collapse. This month, the country’s central bank, scrambling to slow inflation rates and protect the value of its currency, increased its main interest rate by 3 percent.
Ukraine hasn’t tried to position itself as a destination for outsourced IT jobs before, speakers said. But the current political climate indicates the time is ripe to modernize its crippled economy. By outsourcing to Ukraine, the U.S. and other Western countries would not only boost economic development, they would also support another nation’s sovereignty. Several U.S. companies already outsource technology work to Ukraine, including Pepsico, IBM, Chrysler, and Dell. The current state of Ukraine’s deteriorating economy suggests it could use a few more stateside clients.
The IT services industry has indeed exploded in Ukraine in the last decade. The science schools that produced rocket scientists during the Soviet era are now churning out thousands of computer scientists each year. In 2011, Ukraine’s IT services exports exceeded the volume of its arms exports for the first time in history. The country ranks fifth globally in IT services, behind India and Russia.
Outsourcing to a nation in crisis, however, carries risks. Rachael King recently explained for The Wall Street Journal:
When businesses outsource to any low-cost destination, they always weigh risk and benefits, say outsourcing experts. Risks can range from natural disasters such as last year’s typhoon in the Philippines, to violence and political instability in Egypt”¦.The biggest risk now is the political unrest with Russia and what may happen to corporate intellectual property outsourced to the Ukraine if Russia is successful in annexing all or part of the country, said David Rutchik, a partner who specializes in outsourcing at management consulting firm Pace Harmon Inc. Laws in the Ukraine better protect intellectual property, he said, than laws in Russia.
The Ukrainian Embassy hopes this friendlier atmosphere in Ukraine will draw clients away from Russian services. Ukraine is “not dependent on Russia for resources. We have our own resources,” said Ihor Baranetskyi, chief of the embassy’s economic office. “We just need more attention from you.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."