Why Democrats Shouldn’t Be Celebrating

The Affordable Care Act’s enrollment numbers mean less about the midterms than Democrats think.

MIAMI, FL - DECEMBER 22: Angel Rivera (L) and his wife Wilma Rivera sit with, Amada cantera, an insurance agent with Sunshine Life and Health Advisors as they try to purchase health insurance under the Affordable Care Act at the kiosk setup at the Mall of Americas on December 22, 2013 in Miami, Florida. Tomorrow is the deadline for people to sign up if they want their new health benefits to kick in on the 1st of January. People have until March 31, to sign up for coverage that would start later. 
Getty Images
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
May 1, 2014, 5 p.m.

There seemed to be a pop-the-cham­pagne mood among Demo­crats after the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s an­nounce­ment that 8 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans had signed up for health care cov­er­age un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act. Demo­crats, des­per­ate for good news, be­came eu­phor­ic at the sug­ges­tion that per­haps they had turned the corner on Obama­care, mov­ing from it be­ing a likely polit­ic­al li­ab­il­ity to an as­set, and that maybe the 2014 midterm elec­tions might not be so bad. The fact that 8 mil­lion is less than 3 per­cent of the 313.9 mil­lion people in the United States seemed lost in the shuffle.

My im­pres­sion at the time was that this soun­ded a bit too much like whist­ling past the grave­yard. Now an ar­ray of new polling from a vari­ety of sources sug­gests that Demo­crats have no reas­on to be en­cour­aged at this point. Things still look pretty aw­ful for the party. Es­pe­cially mean­ing­ful to con­sider is that — no mat­ter how bad the na­tion­al poll num­bers ap­pear for Demo­crats — eight of their nine most vul­ner­able Sen­ate seats this year are in states that Mitt Rom­ney car­ried in 2012. Fur­ther, nine of the most com­pet­it­ive 11 Sen­ate seats in both parties are in Rom­ney states; the num­bers in these states will likely be con­sid­er­ably worse than the na­tion­al num­bers.

An April 24-27 na­tion­al poll for ABC News and The Wash­ing­ton Post gave Demo­crats a single-point ad­vant­age on the gen­er­ic con­gres­sion­al bal­lot test, 45 per­cent to 44 per­cent. But giv­en the lower turnout num­bers in midterm elec­tions, the likely-voter screen is far more rel­ev­ant. And there, Re­pub­lic­ans led by 5 points, 49 per­cent to 44 per­cent. An NBC News/Wall Street Journ­al poll taken at vir­tu­ally the same time put the two parties dead even at 45 per­cent among all re­gistered voters; pre­sum­ably among likely voters, Re­pub­lic­ans would have pulled ahead by a sim­il­ar lead. This would sug­gest a very dif­fi­cult en­vir­on­ment for Demo­crat­ic House and Sen­ate can­did­ates, par­tic­u­larly those in states and dis­tricts that lean heav­ily Re­pub­lic­an to be­gin with.

The ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll showed Pres­id­ent Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing drop­ping to a re­cord low of 41 per­cent, with 52 per­cent dis­ap­prov­ing. More telling, just 23 per­cent strongly ap­proved of Obama’s per­form­ance, while 40 per­cent strongly dis­ap­proved. On spe­cif­ic is­sue con­cerns, 42 per­cent ap­proved of his hand­ling of the eco­nomy, 54 per­cent dis­ap­proved; 20 per­cent strongly ap­proved, 41 per­cent strongly dis­ap­proved. On hand­ling the situ­ation in­volving Rus­sia and Ukraine, 34 per­cent ap­proved, 46 per­cent dis­ap­proved; just 17 per­cent strongly ap­proved, 31 per­cent strongly dis­ap­proved. Most telling, just 37 per­cent ap­proved of Obama’s hand­ling of the “im­ple­ment­a­tion of the new health care law,” while 57 per­cent dis­ap­proved; 24 per­cent strongly ap­proved, 46 per­cent strongly dis­ap­proved. In March, Obama’s health care num­bers im­proved a bit, but this month they re­turned to where they had been in Feb­ru­ary. To be fair, not all polls are find­ing re­cord lows for Obama. The Gal­lup Poll, for ex­ample, has shown a mod­est im­prove­ment since last fall, to around 44 per­cent ap­prov­al the past couple of weeks, but that’s still pretty bad.

Just-re­leased polling from the au­thor­it­at­ive Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion showed no im­prove­ment in the pub­lic’s per­cep­tion of the Af­ford­able Care Act. Forty-six per­cent of re­spond­ents said they had a gen­er­ally un­fa­vor­able view of the law and 38 per­cent were gen­er­ally fa­vor­able, identic­al to March’s num­bers. Both the March and April num­bers were some­what bet­ter than the dis­mal num­bers in Novem­ber and Janu­ary, when the hor­rif­ic launch of the ex­changes dom­in­ated the news. Now, as things have settled down, 68 per­cent of Demo­crats view the new law fa­vor­ably, and 76 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans have the op­pos­ite point of view; in­de­pend­ents come down 50 per­cent un­fa­vor­able, 37 per­cent fa­vor­able. When Kais­er poll­sters gave re­spond­ents a choice between two points of view — one that “there have been so many prob­lems since the new law’s rol­lout that it’s clear the law is not work­ing as planned,” the oth­er that “there were some early prob­lems that have been fixed and now the law is ba­sic­ally work­ing as in­ten­ded” — 57 per­cent chose the not-work­ing-as-planned view. Just 38 per­cent agreed with the now-fixed op­tion.

One thing should worry Re­pub­lic­ans: the ques­tion con­cern­ing what should be done now about health care re­form. When giv­en the choice between work­ing to re­peal the law and re­pla­cing it with something else versus work­ing to im­prove the law, 58 per­cent chose work­ing to im­prove it, while just 35 per­cent chose re­peal and re­place, the Re­pub­lic­an ar­gu­ment. While the re­peal-and-re­place man­tra pretty much sums up what the pub­lic has been hear­ing from the GOP and its can­did­ates, too many Demo­crat­ic mem­bers of Con­gress seem to hold the view that the ACA was the product of an im­macu­late con­cep­tion and amounts to an in­fal­lible doc­u­ment, not to be tampered with. De­fend­ing the law isn’t the same as try­ing to fix its short­com­ings, and in that sense, both parties’ key ar­gu­ments seem off-base to swing voters.

The fi­nal blow for Demo­crats in terms of sur­vey re­search this week was a new poll of 18-to-29-year-olds by the In­sti­tute of Polit­ics at Har­vard’s John F. Kennedy School of Gov­ern­ment. The sur­vey, the 25th in a series over the past 14 years, showed that in­terest among young voters is low and di­min­ish­ing, and that con­ser­vat­ive young voters are far more mo­tiv­ated to vote this year than their more lib­er­al coun­ter­parts. Giv­en the key role that young­er voters, par­tic­u­larly young and single wo­men, play in the Demo­crat­ic core vote, the ex­tent of the de­crease among young voters dir­ectly hurts the Demo­crats’ abil­ity to hold onto their im­periled Sen­ate ma­jor­ity and keep House losses to a min­im­um (win­ning a ma­jor­ity this year seems com­pletely out of reach). The sur­vey of 3,058 18-to-29-year-olds con­duc­ted on­line (this is the one age group where on­line polling cur­rently makes sense to me) found that only 23 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans un­der 30 said they would “def­in­itely be vot­ing,” with 44 per­cent of those who re­por­ted hav­ing voted for Rom­ney say­ing they would def­in­itely vote and just 35 per­cent of Obama voters say­ing they would. Self-iden­ti­fied con­ser­vat­ives were 10 points more likely to say they would def­in­itely vote than were lib­er­als.

Demo­crats should re­cork the cham­pagne bottles. Someday, they may have a reas­on to open them, but it’s pretty un­likely it will be this year.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this column mis­stated the res­ults of a Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion sur­vey. Forty-six per­cent of re­spond­ents said they had a gen­er­ally un­fa­vor­able view of the Af­ford­able Care Act; 38 per­cent had a gen­er­ally fa­vor­able view.

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
1 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
4 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
5 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
7 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
7 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.