An envoy facilitating talks on potentially banning weapons of mass destruction from the Middle East had some positive and negative things to say last week.
On the one hand, Finnish diplomat Jaakko Laajava said he and other sponsors of the process have been “impressed” by a “readiness to engage” on the part of nations in the region. He said Middle East participants “wish to make progress,” and have taken an “open and constructive approach” to the idea of holding major talks in Helsinki, Finland.
On the other hand, “divergent views persist regarding important aspects of the conference,” Laajava said. The challenges will require a “continued constructive attitude and readiness to find the necessary compromises,” he said.
Laajava was reporting on Thursday to an ongoing Preparatory Committee meeting being held in New York in advance of next year’s five-year Review Conference on the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
The veteran diplomat is the designated facilitator of the U.N.-sponsored process to convene the Helsinki conference, aimed at discussing a future WMD ban in the Middle East. Laajava has led three consultative sessions on the matter since October in Glion, Switzerland, for regional states to informally consider how such a groundbreaking international conference might play out.
Senior representatives of Egypt, Israel and other key Middle East countries have attended the behind-closed-doors consultations. Iran — whose nuclear activities have drawn suspicions about possible military objectives that are now the focus of talks between Tehran and six major powers — attended the first Glion session last year but sat out subsequent meetings in November and February.
At the Swiss resort town, the uneasy Mideast neighbors have been trying to hash out an agenda, logistical details and rules of procedure for the major conference of nations in Helsinki. No date has been set yet for the big gathering, but Laajava said he hopes “consensus can be reached this year” about timing. Finland stands ready to host it at “short notice,” he said.
Laajava said the Glion sessions have “contributed to a better awareness and understanding” of the “possibilities and implications” that a summit in which nations discuss such a ban could affect “peace and stability in the Middle East region and beyond.”
Three nations are officially sponsoring the process as “conveners”: Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. However, like their Mideast counterparts, the convening nations have bickered at times over the politics and motives swirling around the negotiating process.
Russia and Egypt have criticized the United States for allowing a delay in holding the Helsinki confab past December 2012 — a deadline set by the 2010 NPT Review Conference — when Washington’s closest ally in the region, Israel, would not confirm its participation. Benjamin Netanyahu’s government also has never ruled out attending such a conference, but has enjoyed Washington’s support in demanding that any such talks accompany a broader regional effort toward regional security and confidence-building.
Laajava told NPT member nations last week that he would continue to facilitate the informal meetings and — in what may be a bid to Iran to reengage on the matter — said the “active input and contribution by all states of the region are needed.”
The Finnish envoy also appeared to minimize expectations — voiced by Egyptians and others in past years — that the Helsinki conference should launch actual negotiations over creating a zone free of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons in the Middle East.
Rather, nations should “initiate a gradual change in the region, from confrontation to cooperation, with important implications to wider interests of regional and international peace,” Laajava said.
Speaking to the same NPT Preparatory Committee meeting on April 28, Angela Kane — the top U.N. official for disarmament affairs — said the efforts to ban the most dangerous weapons from the Middle East “have greatly benefited in recent months from the constructive engagement of the states of the region in the series of multilateral consultations convened in Glion.” She expressed hope that the major Helsinki conference could be held “as soon as possible in 2014.”
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.