An envoy facilitating talks on potentially banning weapons of mass destruction from the Middle East had some positive and negative things to say last week.
On the one hand, Finnish diplomat Jaakko Laajava said he and other sponsors of the process have been “impressed” by a “readiness to engage” on the part of nations in the region. He said Middle East participants “wish to make progress,” and have taken an “open and constructive approach” to the idea of holding major talks in Helsinki, Finland.
On the other hand, “divergent views persist regarding important aspects of the conference,” Laajava said. The challenges will require a “continued constructive attitude and readiness to find the necessary compromises,” he said.
Laajava was reporting on Thursday to an ongoing Preparatory Committee meeting being held in New York in advance of next year’s five-year Review Conference on the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
The veteran diplomat is the designated facilitator of the U.N.-sponsored process to convene the Helsinki conference, aimed at discussing a future WMD ban in the Middle East. Laajava has led three consultative sessions on the matter since October in Glion, Switzerland, for regional states to informally consider how such a groundbreaking international conference might play out.
Senior representatives of Egypt, Israel and other key Middle East countries have attended the behind-closed-doors consultations. Iran — whose nuclear activities have drawn suspicions about possible military objectives that are now the focus of talks between Tehran and six major powers — attended the first Glion session last year but sat out subsequent meetings in November and February.
At the Swiss resort town, the uneasy Mideast neighbors have been trying to hash out an agenda, logistical details and rules of procedure for the major conference of nations in Helsinki. No date has been set yet for the big gathering, but Laajava said he hopes “consensus can be reached this year” about timing. Finland stands ready to host it at “short notice,” he said.
Laajava said the Glion sessions have “contributed to a better awareness and understanding” of the “possibilities and implications” that a summit in which nations discuss such a ban could affect “peace and stability in the Middle East region and beyond.”
Three nations are officially sponsoring the process as “conveners”: Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. However, like their Mideast counterparts, the convening nations have bickered at times over the politics and motives swirling around the negotiating process.
Russia and Egypt have criticized the United States for allowing a delay in holding the Helsinki confab past December 2012 — a deadline set by the 2010 NPT Review Conference — when Washington’s closest ally in the region, Israel, would not confirm its participation. Benjamin Netanyahu’s government also has never ruled out attending such a conference, but has enjoyed Washington’s support in demanding that any such talks accompany a broader regional effort toward regional security and confidence-building.
Laajava told NPT member nations last week that he would continue to facilitate the informal meetings and — in what may be a bid to Iran to reengage on the matter — said the “active input and contribution by all states of the region are needed.”
The Finnish envoy also appeared to minimize expectations — voiced by Egyptians and others in past years — that the Helsinki conference should launch actual negotiations over creating a zone free of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons in the Middle East.
Rather, nations should “initiate a gradual change in the region, from confrontation to cooperation, with important implications to wider interests of regional and international peace,” Laajava said.
Speaking to the same NPT Preparatory Committee meeting on April 28, Angela Kane — the top U.N. official for disarmament affairs — said the efforts to ban the most dangerous weapons from the Middle East “have greatly benefited in recent months from the constructive engagement of the states of the region in the series of multilateral consultations convened in Glion.” She expressed hope that the major Helsinki conference could be held “as soon as possible in 2014.”
- 1 Why Abortion-Rights Activists Should Fear the Supreme Court
- 2 The Number of U.S. Farmers Markets Has Nearly Doubled in the Last Five Years
- 3 Withdrawal from Climate Deals Would Have Diplomatic Ripple Effects
- 4 Kushner a Subject of FBI Russia Probe
- 5 Gianforte Bests Quist in Special Election After Assault Charge
What We're Following See More »
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."