The Odd Couple Behind the Push to Build a National Women’s History Museum

Marsha Blackburn seems like an unlikely partner for Carolyn Maloney’s long-standing legislative effort, but she may be just the ally Maloney needs.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
May 6, 2014, 10:33 a.m.

At first blush, it’s comed­ic — New York Demo­crat Car­o­lyn Malo­ney and Ten­ness­ee Re­pub­lic­an Mar­sha Black­burn sel­dom agree on any­thing. Now, fi­nally, the two House mem­bers have found some com­mon ground. Not that it was easy.

Malo­ney’s a staunch gun-safety ad­voc­ate; Black­burn’s pro-NRA. Malo­ney sup­ports Obama­care; Black­burn voted for re­peal. Malo­ney’s pro-abor­tion rights; Black­burn op­poses abor­tion. Malo­ney’s lib­er­al even for New York; Black­burn’s re­peatedly scored 100 per­cent on Amer­ic­an Con­ser­vat­ive Uni­on‘s rat­ings of Con­gress.

But if, as Madeleine Al­bright once said, “There’s a spe­cial place in hell for wo­men that don’t help oth­er wo­men,” Malo­ney and Black­burn won’t be found there. The con­ser­vat­ive and pro­gress­ive lions have come to­geth­er to pro­mote an ef­fort to build a na­tion­al wo­men’s his­tory mu­seum.

The bill, which would au­thor­ize ex­plor­a­tion for a mu­seum site, will come up for a vote be­fore the House on Wed­nes­day.

“Quite frankly I’m amazed that there’s not a ma­jor mu­seum any­where ded­ic­ated to the achieve­ments and con­tri­bu­tions of wo­men,” said Malo­ney, who first pro­posed the pro­ject in the late 1990s and has been fight­ing to get a bill passed ever since. Now she may fi­nally have the ally she needs.

While crit­ics note that dozens of mu­seums de­voted to wo­men’s his­tory already ex­ist, Malo­ney says that’s simply not true. There are mu­seums that hon­or wo­men’s con­tri­bu­tions in spe­cif­ic areas — for ex­ample, in the arts. But there’s no space chron­ic­ling wo­men’s over­all achieve­ments in fields as di­verse as math, sci­ence, and pub­lic policy.

The bill has been gain­ing mo­mentum since the be­gin­ning of the year, pick­ing up 48 co­spon­sors and the sup­port of House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor. Giv­en a midterm-elec­tion year in which both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are seek­ing to make in­roads with wo­men voters, the mu­seum pro­ject could find strong sup­port in both cham­bers.

“It shows what free­dom and op­por­tun­ity do for wo­men, and it’s a man­ner in which the ac­com­plish­ment of wo­men can be chron­icled,” Black­burn told Na­tion­al Journ­al. While she’s staunchly an­ti­abor­tion and doesn’t identi­fy as a fem­in­ist “at all,” she says she’s al­ways look­ing for ways to en­cour­age wo­men to seek op­por­tun­ity and fur­ther them­selves. And the aim of her book, Life Equity, she notes, is to help wo­men trans­late their skills to suc­cess in the work­place.

An­oth­er con­ser­vat­ive lead­er, Rep. Ren­ee Ellmers, who’s fa­cing a primary chal­lenge from eco­nom­ic com­ment­at­or Frank Roche, re­cently penned an ed­it­or­i­al prais­ing the ef­fort as well.

Ellmers, like Black­burn, is not someone who’s typ­ic­ally an ally of Malo­ney’s, and that is something she’s de­cidedly proud of. “Wo­men con­trib­ute in this coun­try and they’re con­ser­vat­ive, they’re mod­er­ate, they’re lib­er­al, and they’re all shapes and sizes,” Malo­ney told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “This is a mu­seum for all wo­men and it’s im­port­ant that all voices are part of cre­at­ing it and will be part of see­ing it through.”

The al­li­ance is also, of course, stra­tegic. An­ti­abor­tion groups have voiced con­cern that the mu­seum could serve as a ral­ly­ing point for abor­tion groups, and the in­volve­ment of a con­ser­vat­ive with Black­burn’s an­ti­abor­tion bon­afides helps as­suage that fear.

Cur­rent es­tim­ates for the cost of build­ing the mu­seum range from $300 mil­lion to $500 mil­lion, in ad­di­tion to $1 mil­lion to sup­port the ex­plor­at­ory com­mis­sion that Malo­ney’s bill would es­tab­lish. While the pro­ject would be fin­anced by private funds, it still needs con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al to be built on fed­er­al land.

If it finds a home on the Na­tion­al Mall, as Malo­ney is hop­ing, it would be one of the few mu­seums there that doesn’t rely on any tax­pay­er money. “We’re used to wear­ing high heels and walk­ing back­wards and mul­ti­task­ing all the time,” Malo­ney quipped. “So what’s new that there’s a more dif­fi­cult stand­ard in the cre­ation of a wo­men’s mu­seum?”

What We're Following See More »
WON’T INTERFERE IN STRUCTURING NSC OFFICE
White House to Give McMaster Carte Blanche
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
RESTROOM ISSUES RETURN
Trump To Rescind Trans Protections
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is planning to reverse an Obama-era order requiring that schools allow students to use the bathroom that coincides with their gender identity. Trump "has green-lighted the plan for the Justice Department and Education Department to send a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools rescinding the guidance." A case is going before the Supreme Court on March 28 in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school student, is suing his high school for forbidding him to use the men's room.

Source:
NAIVE, RISK TAKER
Russia Compiling Dossier on Trump’s Mind
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."

Source:
“HORRIBLE” AND “PAINFUL”
Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
COULD COME TUESDAY
Trump Set To Issue New Travel Ban
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is set to issue a new and more focused executive order clarifying the scope of his travel ban, hoping that the order will survive legal challenges. The new order would focus on the same seven countries, "but would only bar entry to those without a visa and who have never entered the United States before. Unlike the original order, people from those countries who already have permanent U.S. residency (green cards) or visas would not face any restrictions." Some lawyers believe the government will now have much stronger standing, though lawyers who challenged the initial order see the same core problems with the forthcoming ban.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login