At first blush, it’s comedic — New York Democrat Carolyn Maloney and Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn seldom agree on anything. Now, finally, the two House members have found some common ground. Not that it was easy.
Maloney’s a staunch gun-safety advocate; Blackburn’s pro-NRA. Maloney supports Obamacare; Blackburn voted for repeal. Maloney’s pro-abortion rights; Blackburn opposes abortion. Maloney’s liberal even for New York; Blackburn’s repeatedly scored 100 percent on American Conservative Union‘s ratings of Congress.
But if, as Madeleine Albright once said, “There’s a special place in hell for women that don’t help other women,” Maloney and Blackburn won’t be found there. The conservative and progressive lions have come together to promote an effort to build a national women’s history museum.
The bill, which would authorize exploration for a museum site, will come up for a vote before the House on Wednesday.
“Quite frankly I’m amazed that there’s not a major museum anywhere dedicated to the achievements and contributions of women,” said Maloney, who first proposed the project in the late 1990s and has been fighting to get a bill passed ever since. Now she may finally have the ally she needs.
While critics note that dozens of museums devoted to women’s history already exist, Maloney says that’s simply not true. There are museums that honor women’s contributions in specific areas — for example, in the arts. But there’s no space chronicling women’s overall achievements in fields as diverse as math, science, and public policy.
The bill has been gaining momentum since the beginning of the year, picking up 48 cosponsors and the support of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. Given a midterm-election year in which both Democrats and Republicans are seeking to make inroads with women voters, the museum project could find strong support in both chambers.
“It shows what freedom and opportunity do for women, and it’s a manner in which the accomplishment of women can be chronicled,” Blackburn told National Journal. While she’s staunchly antiabortion and doesn’t identify as a feminist “at all,” she says she’s always looking for ways to encourage women to seek opportunity and further themselves. And the aim of her book, Life Equity, she notes, is to help women translate their skills to success in the workplace.
Another conservative leader, Rep. Renee Ellmers, who’s facing a primary challenge from economic commentator Frank Roche, recently penned an editorial praising the effort as well.
Ellmers, like Blackburn, is not someone who’s typically an ally of Maloney’s, and that is something she’s decidedly proud of. “Women contribute in this country and they’re conservative, they’re moderate, they’re liberal, and they’re all shapes and sizes,” Maloney told National Journal. “This is a museum for all women and it’s important that all voices are part of creating it and will be part of seeing it through.”
The alliance is also, of course, strategic. Antiabortion groups have voiced concern that the museum could serve as a rallying point for abortion groups, and the involvement of a conservative with Blackburn’s antiabortion bonafides helps assuage that fear.
Current estimates for the cost of building the museum range from $300 million to $500 million, in addition to $1 million to support the exploratory commission that Maloney’s bill would establish. While the project would be financed by private funds, it still needs congressional approval to be built on federal land.
If it finds a home on the National Mall, as Maloney is hoping, it would be one of the few museums there that doesn’t rely on any taxpayer money. “We’re used to wearing high heels and walking backwards and multitasking all the time,” Maloney quipped. “So what’s new that there’s a more difficult standard in the creation of a women’s museum?”
What We're Following See More »
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.
Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.
"President Trump informed Mexican President Pena Nieto and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday afternoon that he will not pull the U.S. from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) despite reports earlier in the day that he had considered doing so. ... The three leaders agreed to proceed quickly with renegotiation plans as the initial review process comes to a close."
"A new bill to revive a permanent nuclear waste repository in Yucca Mountain, Nev., fails to address the concerns of Nevada lawmakers, suggesting the latest attempt may not resolve a 20-year impasse over the issue." The state's congressional delegation "shared their opposition to the nuclear waste policy amendment during a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing focused on the legislation," and promised that Gov. Brian Sandoval would oppose it at every turn. "The new bill aims to finally use some $31 billion that has accumulated in the Nuclear Waste Fund, set aside in 1982 to collect specifically for a permanent repository."