The Obama administration has come out against legislation that would temporarily keep certain Internet management functions under U.S. control.
The U.S. government plans to transfer oversight of the Internet’s address system to the “global community” next year.
Republicans fear the move could allow Russia, China, or other authoritarian regimes to seize power over the Internet and even censor websites. The House Energy and Commerce Committee is set to vote Thursday on the DOTCOM Act, which would block the Internet power transfer pending a study by the Government Accountability Office.
In a letter Tuesday, the Commerce Department said Congress is “well within its right to request a GAO report” even without legislation, but that the administration opposes the DOTCOM Act because it could derail the Internet oversight transfer.
Kelly Walsh, the Commerce Department’s general counsel, argued that the transition is part of the long-standing position of the United States to support the “multi-stakeholder” model of Internet governance, in which decisions are made by an array of nonprofits, companies, academics, and engineers.
By giving up authority over the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers — the nonprofit group that manages the Internet’s address system — the U.S. is strengthening the multi-stakeholder model and undercutting authoritarian regimes that are arguing for more government control of the Internet, she argued.
“By signaling a lack of confidence in the multistakeholder model, this legislation adversely impacts the ability of the United States and its allies to counter attempts by authoritarian regimes to obtain a greater role in Internet governance,” Walsh wrote.
She said the bill “sends the wrong signal to the global Internet community” and “reinforces the misapprehension that the U.S. government ‘controls’ the Internet.”
She emphasized that the U.S. won’t complete the power transfer until ICANN outlines a plan for Internet management that is free from control by any government.
The House committee is expected to approve the bill along party lines Thursday, but it’s unlikely to go anywhere in the Senate.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."