U.S. Chamber of Commerce Takes Aim at GOP Lawyers

The chamber has run TV ads criticizing three Republican candidates for their profession. “They spend their careers suing our members,” the group’s political director said.

National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
Add to Briefcase
Jack Fitzpatrick
May 7, 2014, 5:44 p.m.

Amer­ic­ans don’t think law­yers are par­tic­u­larly trust­worthy, and just about every­one knows a good law­yer joke. But the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce has taken a not­ably vo­cal stance against Re­pub­lic­an per­son­al-in­jury law­yers this year, in­vest­ing in TV ads bash­ing three of them who are run­ning against cham­ber-sup­por­ted can­did­ates.

In GOP primar­ies for a Mis­sis­sippi Sen­ate seat, the North Car­o­lina race for re­tir­ing Rep. Mike McIntyre’s seat, and GOP Rep. Mike Simpson’s bid for reelec­tion in Idaho, the cham­ber has run ads cri­ti­ciz­ing can­did­ates with back­grounds as per­son­al-in­jury law­yers, spend­ing a total of $1.4 mil­lion in those races, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics.

The tac­tic is simply in re­sponse to an un­usu­al situ­ation, said Rob Eng­strom, the cham­ber’s polit­ic­al dir­ect­or. There usu­ally aren’t many per­son­al-in­jury law­yers run­ning for Con­gress as Re­pub­lic­ans, he said. The party has gen­er­ally sup­por­ted tort re­form, in­clud­ing lim­its to re­wards for on-the-job in­jur­ies. And as a pro-busi­ness con­ser­vat­ive or­gan­iz­a­tion, the U.S. cham­ber’s in­terests align against law­yers who have sued com­pan­ies for mil­lions of dol­lars.

“It just so hap­pens we have the op­por­tun­ity to point out in these races that per­son­al-in­jury law­yers are not con­ser­vat­ive,” Eng­strom said. “They spend their ca­reers su­ing our mem­bers.”

The most dra­mat­ic op­por­tun­ity came in North Car­o­lina, when the cham­ber ran a TV ad com­par­ing Woody White, a Re­pub­lic­an, to former Demo­crat­ic Sen. and vice-pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee John Ed­wards. Ed­wards shares little in com­mon with the con­ser­vat­ive White — but both are per­son­al-in­jury law­yers. Ed­wards was in­dicted in 2011 on charges re­lat­ing to al­leged cam­paign fin­ance vi­ol­a­tions and con­spir­acy when he covered up an ex­tramar­it­al af­fair.

“It’s called jack­pot justice, and we’ve seen it be­fore with tri­al law­yers like John Ed­wards,” the ad’s nar­rat­or says. “In search of big pay­days, their law­suits hurt busi­nesses and des­troy jobs…. The last thing Con­gress needs is an­oth­er tri­al law­yer like Woody White.”

The ad promp­ted a re­buke of the na­tion­al cham­ber from the Wilm­ing­ton, N.C., Cham­ber of Com­merce, which said, “En­dorse­ments should be based on a fair rep­res­ent­a­tion of the can­did­ate and not per­petu­ate the per­vas­ive neg­at­iv­ity in polit­ics today.”

White lost the nom­in­a­tion on Tues­day to former state Sen. Dav­id Rouzer, whose cam­paign also chimed in on the law­yer theme. Rouzer ran an­oth­er TV ad say­ing law­yers like White “ar­gue so much and do so little.” With the help of those ads, Rouzer is now very likely to join Con­gress in 2015, hav­ing won the Re­pub­lic­an primary in a very con­ser­vat­ive-lean­ing dis­trict.

The oth­er anti-tri­al-law­yer ads hit on policy sub­stance, ham­mer­ing two oth­er can­did­ates for op­pos­ing tort re­form. In Mis­sis­sippi’s Sen­ate race, the U.S. cham­ber ac­cused state Sen. Chris McDaniel of ar­guing against the state’s 2004 tort-re­form le­gis­la­tion that capped in­jury pay­ments at $1 mil­lion, cit­ing a 2012 case in which he asked for a $36 mil­lion award. McDaniel is run­ning a primary cam­paign against Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Thad Co­chran. McDaniel’s cam­paign re­spon­ded with a state­ment say­ing he has “fought tire­lessly for tort re­form in the le­gis­lature.”

The U.S. cham­ber’s ad in Idaho took a sim­il­ar ap­proach, tout­ing Simpson’s sup­port of the Law­suit Ab­use Re­duc­tion Act and say­ing that chal­lenger (and law­yer) Bry­an Smith “stood in the way when con­ser­vat­ives tried to end junk law­suits in Idaho.”

Eng­strom said the fo­cus on per­son­al-in­jury law­yers doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily re­flect a change in voters’ views on law­yers or law­suits, just that the is­sue has come up in three races and that he “can’t re­call a cycle where it’s been as pre­val­ent.”

“The idea that per­son­al-in­jury law­yers are con­ser­vat­ive is like a bird fly­ing back­wards,” Eng­strom said.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login