U.S. Chamber of Commerce Takes Aim at GOP Lawyers

The chamber has run TV ads criticizing three Republican candidates for their profession. “They spend their careers suing our members,” the group’s political director said.

National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
Add to Briefcase
Jack Fitzpatrick
May 7, 2014, 5:44 p.m.

Amer­ic­ans don’t think law­yers are par­tic­u­larly trust­worthy, and just about every­one knows a good law­yer joke. But the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce has taken a not­ably vo­cal stance against Re­pub­lic­an per­son­al-in­jury law­yers this year, in­vest­ing in TV ads bash­ing three of them who are run­ning against cham­ber-sup­por­ted can­did­ates.

In GOP primar­ies for a Mis­sis­sippi Sen­ate seat, the North Car­o­lina race for re­tir­ing Rep. Mike McIntyre’s seat, and GOP Rep. Mike Simpson’s bid for reelec­tion in Idaho, the cham­ber has run ads cri­ti­ciz­ing can­did­ates with back­grounds as per­son­al-in­jury law­yers, spend­ing a total of $1.4 mil­lion in those races, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics.

The tac­tic is simply in re­sponse to an un­usu­al situ­ation, said Rob Eng­strom, the cham­ber’s polit­ic­al dir­ect­or. There usu­ally aren’t many per­son­al-in­jury law­yers run­ning for Con­gress as Re­pub­lic­ans, he said. The party has gen­er­ally sup­por­ted tort re­form, in­clud­ing lim­its to re­wards for on-the-job in­jur­ies. And as a pro-busi­ness con­ser­vat­ive or­gan­iz­a­tion, the U.S. cham­ber’s in­terests align against law­yers who have sued com­pan­ies for mil­lions of dol­lars.

“It just so hap­pens we have the op­por­tun­ity to point out in these races that per­son­al-in­jury law­yers are not con­ser­vat­ive,” Eng­strom said. “They spend their ca­reers su­ing our mem­bers.”

The most dra­mat­ic op­por­tun­ity came in North Car­o­lina, when the cham­ber ran a TV ad com­par­ing Woody White, a Re­pub­lic­an, to former Demo­crat­ic Sen. and vice-pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee John Ed­wards. Ed­wards shares little in com­mon with the con­ser­vat­ive White — but both are per­son­al-in­jury law­yers. Ed­wards was in­dicted in 2011 on charges re­lat­ing to al­leged cam­paign fin­ance vi­ol­a­tions and con­spir­acy when he covered up an ex­tramar­it­al af­fair.

“It’s called jack­pot justice, and we’ve seen it be­fore with tri­al law­yers like John Ed­wards,” the ad’s nar­rat­or says. “In search of big pay­days, their law­suits hurt busi­nesses and des­troy jobs…. The last thing Con­gress needs is an­oth­er tri­al law­yer like Woody White.”

The ad promp­ted a re­buke of the na­tion­al cham­ber from the Wilm­ing­ton, N.C., Cham­ber of Com­merce, which said, “En­dorse­ments should be based on a fair rep­res­ent­a­tion of the can­did­ate and not per­petu­ate the per­vas­ive neg­at­iv­ity in polit­ics today.”

White lost the nom­in­a­tion on Tues­day to former state Sen. Dav­id Rouzer, whose cam­paign also chimed in on the law­yer theme. Rouzer ran an­oth­er TV ad say­ing law­yers like White “ar­gue so much and do so little.” With the help of those ads, Rouzer is now very likely to join Con­gress in 2015, hav­ing won the Re­pub­lic­an primary in a very con­ser­vat­ive-lean­ing dis­trict.

The oth­er anti-tri­al-law­yer ads hit on policy sub­stance, ham­mer­ing two oth­er can­did­ates for op­pos­ing tort re­form. In Mis­sis­sippi’s Sen­ate race, the U.S. cham­ber ac­cused state Sen. Chris McDaniel of ar­guing against the state’s 2004 tort-re­form le­gis­la­tion that capped in­jury pay­ments at $1 mil­lion, cit­ing a 2012 case in which he asked for a $36 mil­lion award. McDaniel is run­ning a primary cam­paign against Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Thad Co­chran. McDaniel’s cam­paign re­spon­ded with a state­ment say­ing he has “fought tire­lessly for tort re­form in the le­gis­lature.”

The U.S. cham­ber’s ad in Idaho took a sim­il­ar ap­proach, tout­ing Simpson’s sup­port of the Law­suit Ab­use Re­duc­tion Act and say­ing that chal­lenger (and law­yer) Bry­an Smith “stood in the way when con­ser­vat­ives tried to end junk law­suits in Idaho.”

Eng­strom said the fo­cus on per­son­al-in­jury law­yers doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily re­flect a change in voters’ views on law­yers or law­suits, just that the is­sue has come up in three races and that he “can’t re­call a cycle where it’s been as pre­val­ent.”

“The idea that per­son­al-in­jury law­yers are con­ser­vat­ive is like a bird fly­ing back­wards,” Eng­strom said.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
9 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×