Americans don’t think lawyers are particularly trustworthy, and just about everyone knows a good lawyer joke. But the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has taken a notably vocal stance against Republican personal-injury lawyers this year, investing in TV ads bashing three of them who are running against chamber-supported candidates.
In GOP primaries for a Mississippi Senate seat, the North Carolina race for retiring Rep. Mike McIntyre’s seat, and GOP Rep. Mike Simpson’s bid for reelection in Idaho, the chamber has run ads criticizing candidates with backgrounds as personal-injury lawyers, spending a total of $1.4 million in those races, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
The tactic is simply in response to an unusual situation, said Rob Engstrom, the chamber’s political director. There usually aren’t many personal-injury lawyers running for Congress as Republicans, he said. The party has generally supported tort reform, including limits to rewards for on-the-job injuries. And as a pro-business conservative organization, the U.S. chamber’s interests align against lawyers who have sued companies for millions of dollars.
“It just so happens we have the opportunity to point out in these races that personal-injury lawyers are not conservative,” Engstrom said. “They spend their careers suing our members.”
The most dramatic opportunity came in North Carolina, when the chamber ran a TV ad comparing Woody White, a Republican, to former Democratic Sen. and vice-presidential nominee John Edwards. Edwards shares little in common with the conservative White — but both are personal-injury lawyers. Edwards was indicted in 2011 on charges relating to alleged campaign finance violations and conspiracy when he covered up an extramarital affair.
“It’s called jackpot justice, and we’ve seen it before with trial lawyers like John Edwards,” the ad’s narrator says. “In search of big paydays, their lawsuits hurt businesses and destroy jobs…. The last thing Congress needs is another trial lawyer like Woody White.”
The ad prompted a rebuke of the national chamber from the Wilmington, N.C., Chamber of Commerce, which said, “Endorsements should be based on a fair representation of the candidate and not perpetuate the pervasive negativity in politics today.”
White lost the nomination on Tuesday to former state Sen. David Rouzer, whose campaign also chimed in on the lawyer theme. Rouzer ran another TV ad saying lawyers like White “argue so much and do so little.” With the help of those ads, Rouzer is now very likely to join Congress in 2015, having won the Republican primary in a very conservative-leaning district.
The other anti-trial-lawyer ads hit on policy substance, hammering two other candidates for opposing tort reform. In Mississippi’s Senate race, the U.S. chamber accused state Sen. Chris McDaniel of arguing against the state’s 2004 tort-reform legislation that capped injury payments at $1 million, citing a 2012 case in which he asked for a $36 million award. McDaniel is running a primary campaign against Republican Sen. Thad Cochran. McDaniel’s campaign responded with a statement saying he has “fought tirelessly for tort reform in the legislature.”
The U.S. chamber’s ad in Idaho took a similar approach, touting Simpson’s support of the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act and saying that challenger (and lawyer) Bryan Smith “stood in the way when conservatives tried to end junk lawsuits in Idaho.”
Engstrom said the focus on personal-injury lawyers doesn’t necessarily reflect a change in voters’ views on lawyers or lawsuits, just that the issue has come up in three races and that he “can’t recall a cycle where it’s been as prevalent.”
“The idea that personal-injury lawyers are conservative is like a bird flying backwards,” Engstrom said.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."