Conservative Groups Urge Republicans to Oppose Women’s Museum, Republicans Don’t Listen

The bill passed with overwhelming GOP support, sending a clear message to outside conservatives.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) speaks to reporters after a news conference May 16, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
May 7, 2014, 1:50 p.m.

Con­ser­vat­ive out­side groups on Wed­nes­day urged House Re­pub­lic­ans to vote against le­gis­la­tion provid­ing a path for­ward for the Na­tion­al Wo­men’s His­tory Mu­seum, warn­ing that the mu­seum would “rep­res­ent the fem­in­ist ideo­logy” and would “glor­i­fy abor­tion.”

Con­ser­vat­ive groups Her­it­age Ac­tion, Susan B. An­thony List, Con­cerned Wo­men for Amer­ica, the Eagle For­um, and the Fam­ily Re­search Coun­cil all op­posed the wo­men’s-mu­seum le­gis­la­tion and pushed mem­bers to vote against it Wed­nes­day. Her­it­age Ac­tion even aler­ted Re­pub­lic­ans that a “yea” vote would count against them in the group’s an­nu­al rank­ings of con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers.

“Un­less the di­versity of opin­ion among Amer­ic­an wo­men about our own his­tory is af­firm­at­ively ad­dressed and safe­guarded by Con­gress, we urge you to op­pose what will without doubt be­come a shrine to lib­er­al ideo­logy, abor­tion, and lib­er­al ad­voc­ates,” sev­er­al of the groups wrote in a joint let­ter to mem­bers. “Wo­men must not be used as an ex­cuse to pro­mote a sys­tem of be­liefs that ul­ti­mately ex­ploits and harms us. Not on our watch.”

But the bill passed any­way with a 383-33 vote, and a hand­ful of nays changed their votes to sup­port the meas­ure at the last minute. The party makeup among those vot­ing in fa­vor was split al­most equally, with 191 Re­pub­lic­ans and 192 Demo­crats sup­port­ing the meas­ure. All 33 mem­bers who voted against the bill were Re­pub­lic­ans.

The mes­sage from the Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity to the out­side groups op­pos­ing the bill is clear: You’re not help­ing. As Demo­crats con­tin­ue to try to widen — or at least hold onto — the gender gap among voters this fall, Re­pub­lic­an op­pos­i­tion to a bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion for a mu­seum cel­eb­rat­ing the ac­com­plish­ments of wo­men (just a few days be­fore Moth­er’s Day, no less) might not go over well at the polls in Novem­ber.

Rep. Mar­sha Black­burn, R-Tenn., who co­sponsored the mu­seum le­gis­la­tion, gave an im­pas­sioned speech in sup­port of the bill to Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers in their weekly con­fer­ence meet­ing Wed­nes­day morn­ing, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al sources in the room, after col­leagues in­clud­ing Rep. Michele Bach­mann, R-Minn., sug­ges­ted they would vote against it.

Black­burn later re­leased a state­ment to the press say­ing that the mu­seum bill, which merely au­thor­izes a study to find a loc­a­tion for the mu­seum and es­tab­lish its mis­sion among oth­er things, would not cost any tax­pay­er money. She also poin­ted out that Bach­mann had ac­tu­ally once praised the work of the fledgling mu­seum’s staff. 

“Some crit­ics of this le­gis­la­tion have, in­cor­rectly, said that the bill would cre­ate a mu­seum that would por­tray wo­men as mono­lith­ic in their views on abor­tion as well as oth­er is­sues of con­cern to wo­men,” Black­burn said.

That seemed to con­vince many Re­pub­lic­ans in the con­fer­ence, who lined up to back the bill Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon. Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., said that Black­burn’s in­volve­ment alone was enough to con­vince him that the mu­seum wouldn’t con­flict with con­ser­vat­ive pri­or­it­ies.

“It’s not as if Mar­sha Black­burn’s a dan­ger­ous lib­er­al,” he said, chuck­ling. “So I don’t think she’d be as­so­ci­ated with something that she didn’t think was go­ing to be pro­fes­sion­ally done and something that she thought would ul­ti­mately be­come some sort of bur­den to the tax­pay­er or some sort of polit­ic­al weapon. I think she’s try­ing to keep that from hap­pen­ing, quite frankly.”

Black­burn her­self is staunchly an­ti­abor­tion and even told Na­tion­al Journ­al earli­er this week that she doesn’t identi­fy as a fem­in­ist “at all.”

Eight­een of the 20 wo­men in the House Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence voted for the mu­seum bill, with Rep. Vicky Hartz­ler, R-Mo., join­ing Bach­mann in op­pos­i­tion.

Rep. Can­dice Miller, R-Mich., said op­pos­i­tion from out­side con­ser­vat­ive groups — and even some of her own col­leagues — con­cerned her. “Look, I’m a pretty con­ser­vat­ive per­son. I can’t even fol­low that train of thought,” she said. “It’s too con­vo­luted for me.”

What We're Following See More »
AFTER HE POSTED THREATENING PHOTO
Judge Orders Stone Gag Order
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
DATES TBD
New Election Ordered in NC-09
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
TO DEMAND VENEZUELAN PRESIDENT MADURO STEP DOWN
Pence Traveling to Colombia
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Vice President Mike Pence will go to Colombia on Monday to speak with the Colombian president and regional leaders about the ongoing turmoil in Venezuela and rally the international community behind opposition leader Juan Guaidó." Pence "will deliver remarks to the 14 nations that are part of the 'Lima Group' in Bogota," and will meet with Colombian President Ivan Duque.

Source:
LIKELY TO FACE COMPETITION IN REPUBLICAN PRIMARY
Rep. Bradley Byrne Announces Bid Against Sen. Doug Jones
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"U.S. Rep. Bradley Byrne became the first official Republican entrant into the 2020 U.S. Senate race announcing his intention to run in a race that could become one of the most expensive political contests in Alabama history. Byrne, a three-term congressman from Fairhope, said he anticipates the fundraising during the lengthy 2020 campaign to eclipse the 2017 special Senate election, in which an estimated $50 million was spent during the contest. Democratic U.S. Senator Doug Jones, who narrowly defeated Republican Roy Moore in that election, raised more than $24 million."

Source:
TARGETS INCLUDED NANCY PELOSI
Coast Guard Lt. Planned Large-scale Terrorist Attack
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant and self-identified white nationalist was arrested after federal investigators uncovered a cache of weapons and ammunition in his Maryland home that authorities say he stockpiled to launch a widespread domestic terrorist attack targeting politicians and journalists...Though court documents do not detail a specific planned date for an attack, the government said he had been amassing supplies and weapons since at least 2017, developed a spreadsheet of targets that included House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and searched the Internet using phrases such as “best place in dc to see congress people” and “are supreme court justices protected.”

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login