More Than Just Keystone Died in the Senate Wednesday

Murkowski: The new Alaska maverick.
National Journal
Jason Plautz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Jason Plautz
May 8, 2014, 1 a.m.

The col­lapse of a bi­par­tis­an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill on the floor has im­periled the Sen­ate’s vote on the Key­stone XL pipeline, but it’s also got mem­bers sweat­ing that their chance to move any oth­er en­ergy meas­ures has all but slipped away.

“We have things that need to be re­solved and ad­vanced in the en­ergy sec­tor,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, rank­ing mem­ber on the En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee. “If we can’t get an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill through the floor, what does that say about our abil­ity as a Sen­ate to act?”

Re­pub­lic­ans have said that the ef­fi­ciency bill from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hamp­shire and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Rob Port­man of Ohio was their best — and pos­sibly only — chance to de­bate en­ergy is­sues in depth on the floor. They offered up a slew of amend­ments and tried to move five, in­clud­ing ones block­ing a car­bon tax, air pol­lu­tion rules on ozone, and green­house-gas rules for power plants.

Those were polit­ic­ally-charged bills, to say noth­ing of the Key­stone XL pipeline vote that was hitched to the bill as a stand-alone meas­ure.

But Murkowski said she doubts that even some smal­ler meas­ures from her com­mit­tee could move giv­en the “stun­ning” polit­ic­al back­lash on the en­ergy bill, which was aimed at in­creas­ing en­ergy ef­fi­ciency in com­mer­cial and res­id­en­tial prop­er­ties and fed­er­ally owned build­ings. Among her pri­or­it­ies is a bi­par­tis­an nuc­le­ar-waste dis­pos­al bill she in­tro­duced with Cali­for­nia Demo­crat Di­anne Fein­stein and policy pro­pos­als re­lated to the nex­us between en­ergy and wa­ter, which she out­lined in a white pa­per this week.

Re­forms to the na­tion’s en­ergy-ex­port policy could also fall vic­tim to the par­tis­an back­lash, she said.

After say­ing that Re­pub­lic­ans had backed out of a deal to vote on Shaheen-Port­man and the Key­stone pipeline, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id on Wed­nes­day filled the amend­ment tree on the bill and filed clo­ture, with a vote ex­pec­ted Monday.

Sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans said their dis­sat­is­fac­tion with the pro­cess would cause them to yank their votes for the en­ergy bill. Sen. Johnny Isak­son of Geor­gia, one of 24 Re­pub­lic­ans who voted to open de­bate on the bill Tues­day, said simply that he was “not open to rat­i­fy­ing Harry Re­id’s op­er­a­tion of the Sen­ate, which is to fill the tree and not al­low any amend­ments.”

And North Dakota Re­pub­lic­an John Ho­even, one of the spon­sors on the Key­stone bill, said he didn’t think he would help Demo­crats reach 60 votes on en­ergy ef­fi­ciency while Re­id blocked their path to the pipeline bill.

Al­though spon­sors say they’re keep­ing their op­tions open and hope to strike a deal that will keep the bill alive, its pre­sumed death is an­oth­er in a line of dif­fi­culties for the Sen­ate (in­clud­ing the de­feat of an earli­er ver­sion of Shaheen-Port­man, which fell in Septem­ber amid a dis­pute over a health care amend­ment from GOP Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter of Louisi­ana).

Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship had said that their goal in in­sist­ing on five amend­ments was to get a chance to talk about en­ergy is­sues on the floor and se­cure votes on those is­sues for the first time since 2007, al­though the is­sues have seen floor time on oth­er meas­ures like the budget. But Sen. John Bar­rasso, R-Wyo., said that the Right would con­tin­ue to push for the de­bate they want on the bill they think makes the best vehicle.

“If we’re go­ing to talk about en­ergy, we ought to talk about en­ergy,” Bar­rasso said.

What We're Following See More »
Is McMullin Building the GOP in Exile?
31 minutes ago

Evan McMullin, the independent conservative candidate who may win his home state of Utah, is quietly planning to turn his candidacy into a broader movement for principled conservatism. He tells BuzzFeed he's "skeptical" that the Republican party can reform itself "within a generation" and that the party's internal "disease" can't be cured via "the existing infrastructure.” The ex-CIA employee and Capitol Hill staffer says, “I have seen and worked with a lot of very courageous people in my time [but] I have seen a remarkable display of cowardice over the last couple of months in our leaders.” McMullin's team has assembled organizations in the 11 states where he's on the ballot, and adviser Rick Wilson says "there’s actually a very vibrant market for our message in the urban northeast and in parts of the south."

Clinton Up 9 in USA Today Poll; Up 3 According to Fox
41 minutes ago

A new USA Today/Suffolk University poll finds Clinton leads Trump by 9 points nationwide, 47% to 38%. A Fox News national poll has Clinton up just three points, 44% to 41% over Trump.

Too Many Potential Enrollees Paying Obamacare Penalties Instead
1 hours ago

One of the main reasons for the recent Obamacare premium hikes is that many potential enrollees have simply decided to pay the tax penalty for remaining uninsured, rather than pay for insurance. More than 8 million people paid the penalty in 2014, and preliminary numbers for 2015 suggest that the number approaches 6 million. "For the young and healthy who are badly needed to make the exchanges work, it is sometimes cheaper to pay the Internal Revenue Service than an insurance company charging large premiums, with huge deductibles."

Cruz: Eight Justices Could Be an Ongoing Situation
2 hours ago

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”

Chaffetz Also Caves, Says He’ll Vote Trump
5 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.