Everyone’s Lying to You About Benghazi

Choice between two evils: GOP conspiracy theories or White House spin?

US President Barack Obama makes a statement to the press on April 2, 2014 in Chicago, Illinois, on the shooting at the Fort Hood military base in Texas. One person was killed and 14 others wounded April 2, 2014 in a shooting incident at Fort Hood, a US official said.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ron Fournier
May 8, 2014, 5:26 a.m.

Here’s your com­pre­hens­ive guide to the polit­ics of “Benghazi,” the Septem­ber 2012 ter­ror­ist at­tack in Libya that claimed four Amer­ic­an lives.

White House secrecy, de­cep­tion, and a polit­ics-first ob­ses­sion shiel­ded Pres­id­ent Obama from fal­lout dur­ing the 2012 reelec­tion cam­paign. The tac­tics even­tu­ally back­fired to keep the scan­dal alive.

A State De­part­ment email, be­latedly made pub­lic last week un­der court or­der, proves bey­ond reas­on­able doubt that the White House com­mu­nic­a­tions team was more in­ter­ested in cov­er­ing Obama’s butt than shar­ing ac­cur­ate in­form­a­tion with the pub­lic. Deputy Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Ben Rhodes wrote that one “goal” for U.S. Am­bas­sad­or Susan Rice’s tele­vi­sion in­ter­views shortly after the at­tack was to “un­der­score that these protests are rooted in an In­ter­net video, and not a broad­er fail­ure or policy.” An­oth­er stated “goal” was to “re­in­force the Pres­id­ent and Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s strength.” The protests were not rooted in an In­ter­net video, a fact the White House ac­know­ledged only be­latedly, re­luct­antly, and un­der fire.

The White House’s ex­plan­a­tion for with­hold­ing the email from Con­gress was laugh­able. Press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney claimed that an email re­leased un­der court or­der for Benghazi-re­lated doc­u­ments was not about Benghazi. You don’t need to be a right-wing con­spir­acy nut to re­cog­nize that White House ob­fus­ca­tion gave the scan­dal its legs. “It is also im­pol­ite — but ne­ces­sary — to point out that Car­ney and his col­leagues’ opa­city made their Benghazi prob­lem worse,” wrote Wash­ing­ton Post colum­nist Dana Mil­bank.

Polit­ics aside, an in­de­pend­ent pan­el de­term­ined in 2012 that sys­tem­at­ic man­age­ment and lead­er­ship fail­ures at the State De­part­ment led to “grossly” in­ad­equate se­cur­ity at the mis­sion in Benghazi. Des­pite those fail­ures, the Ac­count­ab­il­ity Re­view Board con­cluded that no in­di­vidu­al of­fi­cial ig­nored or vi­ol­ated their du­ties and re­com­men­ded no dis­cip­lin­ary ac­tion.

Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers con­cocted bogus con­spir­acy the­or­ies that in­flamed anti-Obama bi­ases of con­ser­vat­ive voters. Dis­grace­fully, the GOP used the memory of four dead Amer­ic­ans to raise money.

There are too many phony con­spir­acy the­or­ies to re­fute here, but the most in­fam­ous came from the chief GOP in­vest­ig­at­or, Rep. Dar­rell Issa of Cali­for­nia. “I have my sus­pi­cion, which is Sec­ret­ary [Hil­lary] Clin­ton told Le­on [Pan­etta] to stand down,” said the mod­ern-day Mc­Carthy. That lie has taken root in GOP circles des­pite re­ports like this from the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee: “There was no ‘stand down’ or­der is­sued to U.S. mil­it­ary per­son­nel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi.” Issa also claimed that Clin­ton signed a State De­part­ment memo deny­ing se­cur­ity to Benghazi, a blatant false­hood. 

Issa is a joke. His con­duct has un­der­mined the cred­ib­il­ity of the Re­pub­lic­an Party, just as the White House com­mu­nic­a­tions team has un­der­cut trust in the pres­id­ency. After a spate of par­tis­an in­vest­ig­a­tions in Con­gress, it’s hard to fathom how the new “se­lect com­mit­tee” could 1) un­earth evid­ence of wrong­do­ing bey­ond the Ac­count­ab­il­ity Re­view Board’s harsh find­ings, and 2) claim evid­ence of wrong­do­ing that a fair-minded voter would be­lieve.

The shame is that there are les­sons to learn from the lead­er­ship fail­ures in the Clin­ton State De­part­ment and the Obama White House. Benghazi is a re­mind­er, too, of the dangers of in­vad­ing a na­tion like Libya with a light foot­print and walk­ing away. But the two ma­jor parties don’t care about such things. Benghazi is just the latest proof that our lead­ers are ob­sessed with win­ning news cycles and elec­tions — and if vic­tory re­quires fudging a few facts or in­vok­ing the memor­ies of dead Amer­ic­ans to raise blood money, then, well, so be it.

Ter­ror­ists alone are to blame for the Benghazi at­tack. But you might ask, which party handled the af­ter­math worse? Who lied more? Sorry, but that’s a choice between two evils I won’t make.

What We're Following See More »
Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
26 minutes ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
2 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
4 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
4 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.

Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
5 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.