Republicans Have Created Their Benghazi Select Committee. Now What?

The House approved the special panel, with little Democratic support.

Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, answers questions during his weekly news conference on Capitol Hill, May 8, 2014 in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms and Elahe Izadi
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms and Elahe Izadi
May 8, 2014, 2:30 p.m.

It’s of­fi­cial: The House has its Benghazi se­lect com­mit­tee, ap­proved along party lines 232-186.

The en­tire Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence voted Thursday even­ing to cre­ate the com­mit­tee, with just sev­en Demo­crats join­ing them. Demo­crats vot­ing in fa­vor of the cre­ation were Geor­gia’s John Bar­row, North Car­o­lina’s Mike McIntyre, Flor­ida’s Patrick Murphy, Min­nesota’s Col­lin Peterson, West Vir­gin­ia’s Nick Ra­hall, and Ari­zona’s Kyrsten Sinema and Ron Barber.

The new pan­el comes after nu­mer­ous hear­ings were held by four oth­er House com­mit­tees in­vest­ig­at­ing the Sept. 11, 2012, at­tacks in Libya that left four Amer­ic­ans dead, in­clud­ing U.S. Am­bas­sad­or Chris Stevens.

House Speak­er John Boehner has pre­vi­ously said a se­lect com­mit­tee was un­ne­ces­sary, but that changed with the re­lease of an email that had been sent by White House Deputy Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Ben Rhodes to then-United Na­tions Am­bas­sad­or Susan Rice. The email, which sug­gests the White House played a role in shap­ing how Rice dis­cussed the at­tacks, was ob­tained by the con­ser­vat­ive group Ju­di­cial Watch and has Re­pub­lic­ans con­cerned that the ad­min­is­tra­tion is with­hold­ing in­form­a­tion from Con­gress.

“This doesn’t need to be, shouldn’t be, and will not be a par­tis­an pro­cess,” Boehner said Thursday on the House floor. “Four Amer­ic­ans died at the hands of ter­ror­ists in a well-co­ordin­ated as­sault, and we will not take any short­cuts to the truth. We will not al­low any sideshows that dis­tract us from those goals.”

But Demo­crats have roundly re­jec­ted the need for a com­mit­tee, cit­ing the nu­mer­ous hear­ings and con­gres­sion­al work that has already gone in­to in­vest­ig­at­ing what happened in Benghazi and its af­ter­math. They charge that its form­a­tion is polit­ic­ally mo­tiv­ated, and they re­buked the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee for us­ing the cre­ation of the com­mit­tee to drive fun­drais­ing.

“This is noth­ing more than a kangaroo court in the mak­ing,” House Demo­crat­ic Caucus Chair­man Xavi­er Be­cerra said this week.

Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Car­o­lina, a re­spec­ted former fed­er­al pro­sec­utor known for dra­mat­ic ques­tion­ing who will lead the pan­el, has called on fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans to ab­stain from any fun­drais­ing based on the in­vest­ig­a­tion.

But House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship hasn’t fol­lowed Gowdy’s suit; Boehner dodged the ques­tion of NR­CC fun­drais­ing, say­ing Thursday, “Our fo­cus is get­ting the truth for these four fam­il­ies and for the Amer­ic­an people.”

The pan­el has slots for sev­en Re­pub­lic­ans and five Demo­crats. Demo­crats are still weigh­ing wheth­er to ap­point mem­bers to the com­mit­tee; while lead­er­ship ap­pears to be lean­ing to­ward a boy­cott, they haven’t made it of­fi­cial yet. They could make an an­nounce­ment as early as Fri­day, ac­cord­ing to a lead­er­ship aide.

House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi and Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er sent a let­ter to Boehner earli­er this week, re­quest­ing equal num­bers of Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats on the pan­el, as well as equal rep­res­ent­a­tion when it comes to the is­su­ance of sub­poen­as and how doc­u­ments are ob­tained and po­ten­tially re­leased, among oth­er points.

The com­mit­tee’s work could go on for years, well in­to the next cam­paign cycle. This par­tic­u­lar com­mit­tee ex­pires at the end of the 113th Con­gress, but the next Con­gress can reau­thor­ize it. If lead­er­ship chooses to do that, it won’t be hard — Re­pub­lic­ans are ex­pec­ted to main­tain con­trol of the House.

The money used for the com­mit­tee comes out of ex­ist­ing funds au­thor­ized for the func­tion­ing of the House, but a spe­cif­ic dol­lar amount for this com­mit­tee has not been spelled out.

What We're Following See More »
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
14 minutes ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
IN 2014
Pentagon Warned Flynn Not To Accept Foreign Payments
2 hours ago
BREAKING
WOULD PUSH DEADLINE TO MAY 5
One-Week Spending Bill On The Table
2 hours ago
BREAKING

Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

Source:
WILL BE RENEGOTIATED
Trump: I’m Not Pulling Out of NAFTA
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump informed Mexican President Pena Nieto and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday afternoon that he will not pull the U.S. from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) despite reports earlier in the day that he had considered doing so. ... The three leaders agreed to proceed quickly with renegotiation plans as the initial review process comes to a close."

Source:
NEVADA LAWMAKERS STILL NOT SATISFIED
House Puts Yucca Mountain Back on the Table
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A new bill to revive a permanent nuclear waste repository in Yucca Mountain, Nev., fails to address the concerns of Nevada lawmakers, suggesting the latest attempt may not resolve a 20-year impasse over the issue." The state's congressional delegation "shared their opposition to the nuclear waste policy amendment during a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing focused on the legislation," and promised that Gov. Brian Sandoval would oppose it at every turn. "The new bill aims to finally use some $31 billion that has accumulated in the Nuclear Waste Fund, set aside in 1982 to collect specifically for a permanent repository."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login