Carl DeMaio Apologizes for Lifted Pension Report

After plagiarizing a National Journal investigative project to make a case against his opponent, the California Republican says he’s “mortified.”

UNITED STATES - JULY 18: Candidate Carl DeMaio, R-Calif., is interviewed in CQ Roll Call offices. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
Shane Goldmacher
May 12, 2014, 8:24 a.m.

[UP­DATE: Carl De­Maio called late Monday to say he was “mor­ti­fied” by the situ­ation and that Na­tion­al Journ­al should have been cred­ited as the ori­gin­al source of his re­port on con­gres­sion­al pen­sions. “I’m ter­ribly sorry,” he said.

De­Maio said his staff had pro­duced the pen­sions re­port at his dir­ec­tion but he did not know the full ex­tent to which its con­tents had been lif­ted from Na­tion­al Journ­al un­til Monday morn­ing. Still, he took full re­spons­ib­il­ity. “I don’t throw my staff un­der the bus,” he said.

He said he still hoped to change the sys­tem of mem­bers of Con­gress re­ceiv­ing pub­lic pen­sions, cit­ing past suc­cess at the loc­al level when “we’ve been able to shame” un­will­ing politi­cians in­to such re­forms.

The ori­gin­al story ap­pears be­low.]

Re­pub­lic­an con­gres­sion­al can­did­ate Carl De­Maio is at­tack­ing his op­pon­ent for pen­sion double-dip­ping but he ap­pears to be pla­gi­ar­iz­ing Na­tion­al Journ­al to do it.

De­Maio has claimed to have au­thored a “re­port” find­ing that 102 mem­bers of Con­gress are draw­ing a gov­ern­ment pen­sion atop their con­gres­sion­al salar­ies. He leaked an ad­vanced copy to The Wall Street Journ­al on Monday and is fol­low­ing up with an event in San Diego this morn­ing to in­duct some law­makers, most not­ably his op­pon­ent, Rep. Scott Peters, D-Cal­if., in­to a “Hall of Shame.”

But his “re­port” looks like little more than a copied-and-pas­ted ver­sion of a Na­tion­al Journ­al data­base that ac­com­pan­ied a cov­er story last June on con­gres­sion­al double-dip­ping. Na­tion­al Journ­al re­viewed the fin­an­cial dis­clos­ure forms of every mem­ber of the House and Sen­ate to cre­ate the data­base and re­veal that nearly one in five mem­bers of Con­gress are col­lect­ing tax­pay­er-fun­ded re­tire­ments atop their $174,000 salar­ies.

The data in De­Maio’s ver­sion, which is touted as a “Re­port by Carl De­Maio” on its first page, matches the Na­tion­al Journ­al data­base, down to the text, col­ors, and ab­bre­vi­ations.

Among the few dif­fer­ences, De­Maio put a “$” and com­mas in the field de­tail­ing the amount of law­makers’ pub­lic pen­sions.

Also, Peters did not ap­pear in the ori­gin­al Na­tion­al Journ­al data­base be­cause he filed an ex­ten­sion on his fin­an­cial dis­clos­ure form in 2013. He ap­pears to have been in­ser­ted in­to De­Maio’s copied list, which can be seen be­cause the col­ors of law­makers’ entries vary with each per­son, with the ex­cep­tion of Peters.

“De­Maio Re­veal­ing 102 Mem­bers of Con­gress Get Paid Twice,” his cam­paign ad­vert­ised in a press re­lease on Monday, pre­view­ing the event at his cam­paign of­fice and link­ing to The Wall Street Journ­al piece.

De­Maio spokes­man Dave Mc­Cul­loch de­fen­ded the re­port, ar­guing that De­Maio had been “tar­get­ing state and loc­al politi­cians” for pen­sions since 2004.

“As Carl takes his pen­sion-re­form ef­forts na­tion­al, the cam­paign ex­pan­ded his list to in­clude mem­bers of Con­gress, us­ing pub­licly avail­able data in­clud­ing Mem­ber Fin­an­cial In­terest Dis­clos­ures and the pre­vi­ous re­port­ing done by Na­tion­al Journ­al,” Mc­Cul­loch said.

He claimed the cam­paign doc­u­ment is “the first re­port on Double Dip­ping cov­er­ing the cur­rent Con­gress,” though no new fin­an­cial dis­clos­ures have been re­leased since the Na­tion­al Journ­al data­base was pub­lished last June, ex­cept for law­makers who filed ex­ten­sions.

Mean­while, Peters’ of­fice told The Wall Street Journ­al that the con­gress­man donates his pen­sion to loc­al lib­rar­ies.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
23 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
2 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
2 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
3 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login