Planners ended two weeks of talks without agreeing on guidance for the 2015 Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty review meeting, the Associated Press reports.
An insufficient amount of bargaining time was the primary culprit for the failure by diplomats to endorse a final text for advising participants in next year’s NPT Review Conference, said Peruvian Ambassador Enrique Roman-Morey, chairman of the last Preparatory Committee session ahead of the May 2015 review meeting.
The Peruvian official said he would still sign his own name to guidelines developed at the two-week Preparatory Committee meeting in New York.
He added that the speed of efforts to dismantle existing atomic arsenals “is a problem.” The 46-year-old nonproliferation treaty requires signatories in possession of atomic arsenals — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States — to pursue “good faith” talks on nuclear disarmament.
Roman-Morey added that the rate of progress toward potential action to ban weapons of mass destruction from the Middle East “is also a very big issue.” Nonproliferation treaty signatories called in 2010 for governments to examine the possibility in a specially organized gathering, but that meeting still has not taken place.
The new Preparatory Committee document calls for the conference to take place before the end of 2014. Roman-Morey said his own view is that the meeting will take place this year, and he noted a Russian diplomat’s suggestion that it could be scheduled in December.
Finnish diplomat Jaakko Laajava, the meeting’s facilitator, has taken part in a number of related discussions involving Israel, Iran and other Middle Eastern nations. Roman-Morey said Laajava and the conference organizers — Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States — would hold additional planning talks that would partly address possible focuses of the gathering.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.