Only in Nebraska could primary voters have the surprise factor to reject both the tea party’s darling and a Washington favorite in favor of an overlooked candidate running in third place. Now they might do it again.
For most of the campaign, two Republican primary candidates — Midland University president Ben Sasse and former state Treasurer Shane Osborn — gobbled up headlines, the top of the polls, and the attention of more than $3.5 million in outside group spending. But the de-facto two-man race has been shattered by local bank president Sid Dinsdale, whose surge in the last two weeks has made him the talk of the state’s primary to replace retiring Sen. Mike Johanns.
It’s a story everyone in Nebraska politics has heard before. Just two years ago, primary voters rejected the negative campaigns of two front-running candidates to boost state legislator Deb Fischer, then an underdog candidate also running in third place, into the U.S. Senate. Once again hit by an influx of outside attacks, voters have a similar choice.
“It’s what they call Prairie Populism,” said Nebraska Republican consultant Phil Young. “Nebraskans are educated voters, and they don’t like outside interests getting involved. They can make up their own minds.”
Sasse remains the favorite, but strategists in the Cornhusker State say Dinsdale has a chance to pull the upset thanks in part to staying off the airwaves and out of the fray until the race’s final weeks — a decision that kept him out of the crosshairs of his opponents. Sasse’s campaign has targeted him more aggressively of late, redirecting fire that it (and Sasse’s outside allies) had previously aimed at Osborn. Most of the advertising in play this past week has been either for or against Dinsdale.
In a state with notoriously fickle voting habits, Dinsdale is betting his late-breaking, local campaign will appeal to a plurality.
“Nebraskans know the Dinsdales from the community bank franchises and their agribusinesses,” said Dinsdale campaign strategist Sam Fischer (who is also a nephew of the state’s junior U.S. senator). He pointed to Pinnacle Bank locations across the state as being known for their community involvement, from banking to supporting local Little Leagues.
Dinsdale’s campaign is also putting his father’s household name to use, featuring Roy Dinsdale in some of the campaign ads.
Young said that kind of Main Street messaging is what resonates with Nebraskans, not outside ads.
“It’s a small enough state, you can win a campaign with grassroots here,” Young said. “There’s a lot of other means of messaging that carry weight.”
Nebraska campaign consultant Chris Peterson, who’s unaffiliated in the race, pointed to Dinsdale’s in-state fundraising as another indication that he was playing by Nebraska’s rule book.
Dinsdale raised nearly $1 million from within the state before chipping in with a personal loan of the same amount. He spent the first major chunk of his campaign traveling the state long before going on air.
Sasse’s and Osborn’s campaigns are both quick to poke holes in the theory that Dinsdale could replicate Fischer’s victory, primarily because they allege his background and agenda are too moderate. It’s an argument that outside groups have echoed in ferocious, last-minute attacks on TV.
“Deb Fischer was a 3rd [Congressional] District rancher, and she’s a conservative,” said Sasse adviser Jordan Gehrke. “Sid is a moderate banker from Omaha.”
Gehrke was also skeptical of the idea that the race had reached the levels of negativity that turned off voters in 2012. The front-runners “just absolutely bludgeoned each other in 2012; their negatives were both upside down by Election Day,” Gehrke said. “Voters didn’t like either one of those guys. That hasn’t happened here.”
Young, who worked on the Fischer campaign in 2012, said one hitch to the Dinsdale surge may be early voters, who have had ballots for nearly 35 days. Those voters would be more likely to have cast ballots for Osborn, who was in a stronger position just a few weeks ago, he said. That’s just one of many issues scrambling the primary in its last days.
What We're Following See More »
The Las Vegas Review-Journal, owned by casino magnate and GOP donor Sheldon Adelson, became the first major city newspaper to endorse Donald Trump over the weekend.“Mr. Trump represents neither the danger his critics claim nor the magic elixir many of his supporters crave,” the editorial read, acknowledging concerns about Trump’s temperament. “But neither candidate will ever be called to the dais to accept an award for moral probity and character,” the paper said. “And we are already distressingly familiar with the Clinton way, which involves turning public service into an orgy of influence peddling and entitlement designed to line their own pockets — precisely what a disgruntled electorate now rises up to protest.”
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 12 percentage points among likely voters, 50 to 38 percent, in a new ABC News tracking poll, "her highest support and his lowest to date in ABC News and ABC News/Washington Post polls. Gary Johnson has 5 percent support, Jill Stein 2 percent. Clinton led by only four points in the last ABC/Post poll on Oct. 13.
President Obama "will make a late splash into races for state senate and assembly over the next week, endorsing roughly 150 candidates across 20 states. He’ll also back a candidate for the North Carolina Supreme Court. The endorsements — which will come along with a variety of robocalls, social media posts, mailers, photos of Obama with the candidates taken as he’s been traveling to campaign in recent weeks, and even a few radio ads — are Obama’s biggest investment in state races ever by far."
If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."