Canadian Govt. Seen Probing Public Interest in Joining U.S. Missile Shield

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
May 13, 2014, 6:45 a.m.

Canada’s Con­ser­vat­ive Party-led gov­ern­ment seems to be prob­ing the pub­lic in­terest in join­ing a U.S. an­ti­mis­sile ini­ti­at­ive, the Globe and Mail re­ports.

Con­ser­vat­ive-con­trolled pan­els in the Ca­na­dian Sen­ate and House of Com­mons are in­ter­view­ing ex­perts about the costs and be­ne­fits of col­lab­or­at­ing with the United States on a mis­sile de­fense frame­work to pro­tect North Amer­ica, ac­cord­ing to the Tues­day art­icle. In 2005, then-Ca­na­dian Prime Min­is­ter Paul Mar­tin of the Lib­er­al Party op­ted to turn down a U.S. re­quest to par­ti­cip­ate in re­gion­al mis­sile de­fense.

A change in polit­ic­al lead­er­ship as well as per­cep­tions of a grow­ing threat posed by North Korea’s long-range mis­sile de­vel­op­ment have promp­ted Ot­t­awa to re­as­sess its stance on the is­sue, ac­cord­ing to Colin Robertson, vice-pres­id­ent of the Ca­na­dian De­fense and For­eign Af­fairs In­sti­tute.

“I think the gov­ern­ment is test­ing the wa­ters to see wheth­er the con­di­tions are right,” said Robertson, who fa­vors join­ing the U.S. mis­sile shield.

Philip Coyle, a one­time head of the Pentagon’s weapons test­ing and eval­u­ation of­fice, in Monday testi­mony to the Sen­ate cri­ti­cized U.S. mis­sile de­fense ef­forts as in­ef­fect­ive. “The hard­ware be­ing de­ployed in Alaska and Cali­for­nia has no demon­strated cap­ab­il­ity to de­fend the United States, let alone Canada, against en­emy mis­sile at­tack un­der real­ist­ic op­er­a­tion­al con­di­tions,” Coyle said.

He was re­fer­ring to the 30 in­ter­cept­ors cur­rently fielded on the West Coast as part of the Ground-based Mid­course De­fense sys­tem — the coun­try’s prin­cip­al de­fense against a lim­ited stra­tegic bal­list­ic mis­sile strike.

Con­fer­ence of De­fense As­so­ci­ations In­sti­tute ana­lyst Dav­id Perry said he be­lieves the Ca­na­dian gov­ern­ment is “float­ing a tri­al bal­loon” with the par­lia­ment hear­ings.

De­fense Min­is­ter Rob Nich­olson’s of­fice would not an­swer a ques­tion on wheth­er the gov­ern­ment is con­sid­er­ing chan­ging its mind about mis­sile de­fense co­oper­a­tion with Wash­ing­ton.

“No de­cision has been made to change this policy,” said his spokes­wo­man, Jo­hanna Quin­ney. “We will con­tin­ue to mon­it­or in­ter­na­tion­al de­vel­op­ments.”

What We're Following See More »
PENCE BREAKS THE TIE
Senate Will Debate House Bill
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

By the narrowest of margins, the Senate voted 51-50 this afternoon to begin debate on the House's legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins defected from the GOP, but Vice President Pence broke a tie. Sen. John McCain returned from brain surgery to cast his vote.

Source:
WON’T SAY IF HE’LL FIRE HIM
Trump “Disappointed” in Sessions
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“'It’s not like a great loyal thing about the endorsement,'” Mr. Trump said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. 'I’m very disappointed in Jeff Sessions.'”

Source:
MURKOWSKI, COLLINS VOTE NAY
Republicans Reach 50 Votes to Proceed on Health Bill
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
INTERVIEWED KUSHNER FOR OVER THREE HOURS
House Russia Probe: Kushner “Satisfied” Questions
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Republicans who interviewed Jared Kushner for more than three hours in the House’s Russia probe on Tuesday said the president’s son-in-law and adviser came across as candid and cooperative. 'His answers were forthcoming and complete. He satisfied all my questions,' said Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), who’s leading the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign."

Source:
VICTORY FOR GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES
Appeals Court Block D.C. Gun Control Law
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday blocked a gun regulation in Washington, D.C., that limited the right to carry a handgun in public to those with a special need for self-defense, handing a victory to gun rights advocates. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's 2-1 ruling struck down the local government's third major attempt in 40 years to limit handgun rights, citing what it said was scant but clear guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court on the right to bear arms."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login