Canada’s Conservative Party-led government seems to be probing the public interest in joining a U.S. antimissile initiative, the Globe and Mail reports.
Conservative-controlled panels in the Canadian Senate and House of Commons are interviewing experts about the costs and benefits of collaborating with the United States on a missile defense framework to protect North America, according to the Tuesday article. In 2005, then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin of the Liberal Party opted to turn down a U.S. request to participate in regional missile defense.
A change in political leadership as well as perceptions of a growing threat posed by North Korea’s long-range missile development have prompted Ottawa to reassess its stance on the issue, according to Colin Robertson, vice-president of the Canadian Defense and Foreign Affairs Institute.
“I think the government is testing the waters to see whether the conditions are right,” said Robertson, who favors joining the U.S. missile shield.
Philip Coyle, a onetime head of the Pentagon’s weapons testing and evaluation office, in Monday testimony to the Senate criticized U.S. missile defense efforts as ineffective. “The hardware being deployed in Alaska and California has no demonstrated capability to defend the United States, let alone Canada, against enemy missile attack under realistic operational conditions,” Coyle said.
He was referring to the 30 interceptors currently fielded on the West Coast as part of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system — the country’s principal defense against a limited strategic ballistic missile strike.
Conference of Defense Associations Institute analyst David Perry said he believes the Canadian government is “floating a trial balloon” with the parliament hearings.
Defense Minister Rob Nicholson’s office would not answer a question on whether the government is considering changing its mind about missile defense cooperation with Washington.
“No decision has been made to change this policy,” said his spokeswoman, Johanna Quinney. “We will continue to monitor international developments.”
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.