Why Is Texas Terrible at Producing Solar Power?

CHICAGO - SEPTEMBER 01: Solar photovoltaic panels generate electricity at an Exelon solar power facility on September 1, 2010 in Chicago, Illinois. The 10-megawatt facility located on the city's south side is the largest urban solar installation in the United States. The 32,292 panels can generate more than 14,000 megawatt-hours of electricity per year, enough to meet the annual energy requirements of up to 1,500 homes.
National Journal
Patrick Reis, Jason Plautz and Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Patrick Reis and Jason Plautz and Clare Foran
May 15, 2014, 3:41 p.m.

Texas is an en­ergy su­per­power, and not just for fossil fuels. The Lone Star State pro­duces more nat­ur­al gas than any oth­er state, but it also leads the na­tion in wind en­ergy.

It’s also a massive, South­ern, sun-baked state that is so full of the wide-open spaces needed for sol­ar pan­els that it rivals Cali­for­nia for the na­tion’s largest sol­ar-en­ergy po­ten­tial, ac­cord­ing to an En­ergy De­part­ment re­port. Texas, the re­port says, is home to a full 20 per­cent of total U.S. po­ten­tial for con­cen­trated sol­ar power.

Only a tiny per­cent­age of that po­ten­tial, however, has been ex­ploited. Ac­cord­ing to the Sol­ar En­ergy In­dus­tries As­so­ci­ation, Texas has only about 200 mega­watts worth of sol­ar-power pan­els in­stalled. That’s less than is cur­rently fir­ing in New Jer­sey, Mas­sachu­setts, and New York.

So why is Texas’s sol­ar sec­tor flounder­ing when oth­er en­ergy sources, even oth­er fledgling re­new­able-en­ergy sources, are sur­ging? In short, be­cause a con­flu­ence of policy choices and eco­nom­ic forces have stun­ted the state’s sol­ar growth — and few sol­ar ad­voc­ates see hope that the state land­scape will change any­time soon.

“It’s frus­trat­ing be­cause you look and you think, ‘Wow, this could be amaz­ing,’ ” said Car­rie Cul­len Hitt, seni­or vice pres­id­ent of state af­fairs for the Sol­ar En­ergy In­dus­tries As­so­ci­ation. “Be­cause it’s a new mar­ket, you need some eco­nom­ies of scale go­ing in and those states had some policies in place, be they re­bates or tax in­cent­ives. Texas doesn’t have those things “¦ and be­cause of that, they have not had the mar­ket star­tup mech­an­isms in place.”

But any push for such policies has a high hurdle to over­come: the hy­per-par­tis­an­ship of the na­tion’s en­ergy de­bate.

A dec­ade ago, policies sup­port­ing re­new­able en­ergy were largely viewed through the lens of in­vest­ment, and as such had sig­ni­fic­ant state-level suc­cess in at­tract­ing bi­par­tis­an sup­port. Now — after a bloody con­gres­sion­al struggle over the cap-and-trade cli­mate bill — such sup­ports are in­creas­ingly viewed as a polit­ic­al state­ment. In deep-red Texas, there’s little le­gis­lat­ive ap­pet­ite to re­struc­tur­ing the state’s en­ergy policies to find new sup­port for sol­ar.

And so Texas is likely to con­tin­ue for­ward with a leg­al code that, thus far, has failed to sig­ni­fic­antly spur sol­ar in­vest­ment.

Texas is one of 29 states with a re­new­able-en­ergy stand­ard — a goal for get­ting a cer­tain amount of its power from sources like wind, sol­ar, and oth­er fossil-fuel al­tern­at­ives. When the stand­ard was signed in­to law in 1999 it called for 2,000 mega­watts of ad­di­tion­al re­new­able power gen­er­a­tion to be brought on­line with­in a dec­ade. But with­in that stand­ard, there was no spe­cif­ic re­quire­ment that any of those in­stall­a­tions come from sol­ar power. And without that re­quire­ment, de­velopers over­whelm­ingly chose wind en­ergy — which for in­vestors was both more fa­mil­i­ar and, as it fre­quently re­quires lower front-end costs, less risky.

Texas also lacks “net-meter­ing,” a policy that has helped sol­ar flour­ish else­where. Net-meter­ing al­lows res­id­en­tial sol­ar cus­tom­ers to earn full re­tail cred­it for ex­cess elec­tri­city that they sell back to the grid. It’s a policy that’s on the books in 43 states, but doesn’t ex­ist at the state level in Texas. Power pro­viders there have the op­tion to cre­ate sol­ar-power in­cent­ive pro­grams of their own, but few­er than one in 10 has done so, ac­cord­ing to a 2011 re­port from the non­profit con­sumer-ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Cit­izen.

Sol­ar’s main sup­port in Texas comes from a fed­er­al policy. The sol­ar in­vest­ment tax cred­it is a 30 per­cent tax cred­it made avail­able to res­id­en­tial and com­mer­cial sol­ar pro­jects.

To be sure, not all of sol­ar’s Texas woes stem from state-level policies. The en­ergy source has also taken a beat­ing from eco­nom­ic forces. Elec­tri­city is typ­ic­ally dirt cheap in Texas, mak­ing it hard for any power plant to turn a profit, es­pe­cially one with high up-front costs like a sol­ar farm. And the frack­ing boom has stiffened com­pet­i­tion for sol­ar en­ergy as the sup­ply glut and res­ult­ing price dip in fuel prices has made nat­ur­al-gas power plants a more at­tract­ive op­tion.

But ad­voc­ates in­sist that with the right policies, sol­ar has strong po­ten­tial in Texas — and they point to two cit­ies where it has flour­ished: San Ant­o­nio and, to a less­er ex­tent, Aus­tin.

San Ant­o­nio has 90 mega­watts of util­ity-scale sol­ar on­line with an­oth­er 15 mega­watts from dir­ect gen­er­a­tion, and util­ity CPS En­ergy es­tim­ates there’s an­oth­er 385 mega­watts com­ing on­line over the next two to three years. That’s been enough to rank the River City sixth na­tion­wide in sol­ar ca­pa­city, ac­cord­ing to an April re­port from En­vir­on­ment Texas, and has at­trac­ted sol­ar com­pan­ies to set up shop in the city.

Aus­tin, mean­while, has 16 mega­watts on­line.

What sets them apart? Both cit­ies have mu­ni­cip­al util­it­ies that had more free­dom to set in­de­pend­ent re­new­able goals and of­fer re­bates than the de­reg­u­lated mar­kets else­where in the state. Lanny Sinkin, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the non­profit Sol­ar San Ant­o­nio, said the abil­ity of a mu­ni­cip­al util­ity to “look at val­ues bey­ond the bot­tom line” has made city-level ini­ti­at­ives more suc­cess­ful.

And from that, sol­ar ad­voc­ates see hope for broad­er pro­gress.

“We have as­sumed that we had to de­vel­op a strategy that did not rely on state sup­port,” said Lanny Sinkin, the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Sol­ar San Ant­o­nio. “It was just nev­er go­ing to come and de­vel­op the strategy for how to get it. Now I think that with the rap­id ex­pan­sion of sol­ar in Texas, there’s go­ing to be more and more polit­ic­al sup­port.”

And ul­ti­mately, sol­ar’s best hope in Texas likely comes not from policy, but from tech­no­logy. The cost of sol­ar pan­els is fall­ing pre­cip­it­ously, as sci­ent­ists de­vel­op more ef­fi­cient man­u­fac­tur­ing mod­els and cheap­er Chinese mod­els hit the mar­ket. And even for a green en­ergy source in a red state, it’s dif­fi­cult to ar­gue with a lower price tag.

What We're Following See More »
WHO PLAYED THE DONALD?
Longtime Clinton Aide Played Trump in Mock Debates
5 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.

Source:
WEEKEND POLLING ROUNDUP
New Polls Still Show Razor-Thin Margins
11 minutes ago
THE LATEST
  • A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
  • A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
  • A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
  • A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
THE QUESTION
How Many Times Has the Trump Campaign Emailed Ted Cruz’s Supporters?
17 minutes ago
THE ANSWER

More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."

Source:
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
×