Why Do a Majority of Black and Latino Students End Up at Two-Year Colleges?

A new initiative in East Los Angeles hopes to create a college-going culture that will steer Latino students to four-year schools, where they’re much more likely to graduate with a degree.

Students at Garfield High School in East Los Angeles work on group engineering projects. Thanks to a new collaboration with Cal State L.A., graduating seniors will be eligible for automatic admission to the local four-year university.
National Journal
Janell Ross
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Janell Ross
May 21, 2014, 12:34 p.m.

In Los Angeles, the an­nounce­ment last week made for front-of-the-loc­al-sec­tion news. Stu­dents at gang- and poverty-rid­den East Los Angeles’s Gar­field High School who meet min­im­um re­quire­ments will now en­joy guar­an­teed ad­mis­sion to Cali­for­nia State Uni­versity (Los Angeles). The same ini­ti­at­ive will also guar­an­tee that stu­dents at East L.A. Col­lege, a nearby com­munity col­lege, can trans­fer to Cal State L.A., and the com­munity col­lege will ex­pand its course of­fer­ings avail­able to Gar­field stu­dents.

The part­ner­ship between the Los Angeles Board of Edu­ca­tion, lead­er­ship at Cal State L.A., and East L.A. Col­lege aims to cre­ate a col­lege-go­ing cul­ture in a sec­tion of East Los Angeles where only a tiny share of the over­whelm­ingly Latino res­id­ents have col­lege de­grees. Re­search shows that giv­ing minor­ity high school stu­dents op­por­tun­it­ies to spend time on col­lege cam­puses and in classrooms, earn col­lege cred­its while still in high school, and ac­cess ment­ors and in­tern­ships — all ad­di­tion­al fea­tures of the ar­range­ment — makes them more likely to both enter col­lege and gradu­ate.

In the nearly five dec­ades since the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment began track­ing minor­ity col­lege en­roll­ment, col­lege en­trance pat­terns have taken on a new shape. The once-sig­ni­fic­ant gaps between the share of black, white, and Latino stu­dents en­ter­ing col­lege have reached near equi­lib­ri­um. (Asi­an stu­dents have long en­rolled at a high­er rate than the oth­er groups.) In 2012, Latino stu­dents even slightly out­paced their black and white peers when it came to en­ter­ing col­lege. Still, a vast gulf re­mains in terms of who ac­tu­ally gradu­ates with a de­gree.

“The is­sue we face is not one of ac­cess but com­ple­tion,” says Jeff Strohl, dir­ect­or of re­search at Geor­getown Uni­versity’s Cen­ter on Edu­ca­tion and the Work­force.

The most re­cent fed­er­al data avail­able de­pict the out­comes for stu­dents who en­rolled full-time in 2005 and gradu­ated by 2011. Dur­ing that time, about 69 per­cent of Asi­an stu­dents earned un­der­gradu­ate de­grees, as did 58 per­cent of whites. But just 46 per­cent of Latino stu­dents and 45 per­cent of black stu­dents com­pleted their un­der­gradu­ate edu­ca­tion.

“This is the kind of prob­lem we simply can’t ig­nore,” says Susie Savedra, seni­or le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or for health and edu­ca­tion policy with the Na­tion­al Urb­an League. “If we can’t get more stu­dents of all races and back­grounds all the way through col­lege now, we will be fa­cing a much broad­er crisis.” 

With­in just four years, the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans un­der the age of 18 will be people of col­or. The Na­tion­al Urb­an League re­leased a re­port last week warn­ing that schools and poli­cy­makers need a bet­ter un­der­stand­ing of the na­tion’s black and Latino stu­dent pop­u­la­tions if they want to boost gradu­ation rates. The re­port fo­cused on the lower-in­come black stu­dents, the group least likely to com­plete an un­der­gradu­ate de­gree pro­gram. But its re­com­mend­a­tions could and should be ap­plied broadly to boost the na­tion­al gradu­ation rate, says Sav­endra.

Dur­ing the 2011-2012 school year, about 62 per­cent of all black col­lege stu­dents re­ceived Pell Grants, fed­er­al stu­dent aid re­served for the poorest stu­dents. Of these stu­dents, 65 per­cent were clas­si­fied as in­de­pend­ent, mean­ing they re­ceive no fin­an­cial sup­port from their fam­il­ies. In­de­pend­ent Afric­an-Amer­ic­an Pell Grant re­cip­i­ents were by far the most likely (48 per­cent) to also be single par­ents re­spons­ible for the care of of­ten very young chil­dren. The same was true of 34 per­cent of Latino stu­dents, 23 per­cent of whites, and 19 per­cent of Asi­ans.

Those re­spons­ib­il­it­ies also mean that just over half of black in­de­pend­ent stu­dents re­ceiv­ing Pell Grants are over the age of 24. Most are already work­ing 30 hours or more each week. Just un­der half of these same in­di­vidu­als de­scribe them­selves as work­ers who are also en­rolled in school as op­posed to stu­dents work­ing their way through school.

Most schools have de­signed everything from their class sched­ules to the en­roll­ment pro­cess and the course­work ne­ces­sary to gradu­ate around middle- to up­per-middle-class stu­dents who at­tend school full-time, live on or near cam­pus, and have lim­ited out­side re­spons­ib­il­it­ies, said Mary­beth Gas­man, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or of edu­ca­tion at the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania. Gas­man is also one of the coun­try’s lead­ing ex­perts on the edu­ca­tion­al tra­ject­or­ies of black stu­dents.

Gas­man de­scribes her­self as an ex­ample of what a Pell Grant can do. She comes from a large and very low-in­come fam­ily. She was the first in her fam­ily to even at­tend, much less com­plete, col­lege. Today, Gas­man has a Ph.D. and teaches at an Ivy League uni­versity. She also has a teen­age daugh­ter who speaks three lan­guages and has already traveled abroad.

“That’s what happened in my fam­ily in a single gen­er­a­tion be­cause of a Pell Grant and the pres­ence of a few key people who were will­ing to guide me through a pro­cess no one in my fam­ily knew any­thing about,” she says.

Even though no one in her fam­ily had pre­vi­ously at­ten­ded col­lege, Gas­man, who is white, be­nefited from a col­lege-go­ing cul­ture in her lar­ger com­munity. A study re­leased last year by Geor­getown’s Cen­ter on Edu­ca­tion and the Work­force looked at en­roll­ment trends at 4,400 in­sti­tu­tions, and found that even low-in­come or low-per­form­ing white stu­dents are far more likely to at­tend four-year col­leges than high-in­come or high-per­form­ing minor­ity stu­dents.

The Geor­getown re­search­ers found that since 1995, 85 per­cent of in­com­ing white stu­dents at­ten­ded se­lect­ive four-year schools. Dur­ing that same time peri­od, 72 per­cent of in­com­ing Latino stu­dents and 68 per­cent of their black peers in­stead went to two-year, open-en­roll­ment schools.

Se­lect­ive four-year in­sti­tu­tions gen­er­ally have the fund­ing and fac­ulty to provide tu­tor­ing op­er­a­tions, high­er-qual­ity labs, and more-fre­quent aca­dem­ic sup­port. They are more likely to re­quire reg­u­lar and act­ive aca­dem­ic ad­vising ses­sions between in­di­vidu­al stu­dents and fac­ulty, and to re­quire stu­dents to identi­fy a ma­jor and fo­cus their stud­ies early on in the col­lege pro­cess. All of these factors boost gradu­ation rates, Strohl says.

Even minor­ity stu­dents with high GPAs and stand­ard­ized-test scores are far more likely to at­tend two-year schools than their white peers and are sub­sequently far less likely to gradu­ate. The new col­lege pipeline es­tab­lished for stu­dents at Gar­field High in East Los Angeles should al­ter that trend — and it could provide a mod­el for boost­ing gradu­ation rates in oth­er areas of the coun­try that badly need the help.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
1 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login