How GOP Governors Can Make Peace With Obamacare’s Medicaid Expansion

Hint: Don’t call it Medicaid expansion. Or Obamacare.

House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence looks out over the crowd as US President Barack Obama answers a question at the Republican GOP House Issues Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, January 29, 2010. AFP PHOTO / Saul LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Novack
May 19, 2014, 9:43 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­an In­di­ana Gov. Mike Pence wants to re­peal Obama­care. But in the mean­time, he’ll ac­cept fed­er­al funds for the health law’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion.

Pence an­nounced in a turn­around last week that he would take the ex­pan­sion money to grow the state’s own pro­gram — the Healthy In­di­ana Plan — to cov­er low-in­come in­di­vidu­als who would qual­i­fy for tra­di­tion­al Medi­caid un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion.

But he wants to make his op­pos­i­tion to the health law — and com­mit­ment to re­peal — very clear.

“Obama­care needs to be re­pealed for many reas­ons, in­clud­ing that it is push­ing a massive, flawed Medi­caid pro­gram onto states,” Pence said at an Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute event Monday. Once Obama­care is re­pealed, [In­di­ana’s] con­sumer-driv­en plan will serve as a mod­el for what block-gran­ted Medi­caid pro­grams can be in states across the coun­try.”

Obama­care calls for the ex­pan­sion of Medi­caid cov­er­age to all in­di­vidu­als be­low 138 per­cent of the fed­er­al poverty level, but the Su­preme Court left the de­cision to the states. Twenty-six states plus D.C. have op­ted in­to ex­pan­sion, but a hand­ful of red states have re­frained, in protest against the en­ti­tle­ment pro­gram and the health care law.

Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors have found them­selves in sticky ter­rit­ory — want­ing to avoid a cov­er­age gap in their state, but more vehe­mently want­ing to avoid giv­ing their im­pli­cit stamp of ap­prov­al to Obama­care.

Some, like Pence, have tried to find work­arounds that would take the fed­er­al fund­ing and ex­pand cov­er­age to low-in­come res­id­ents, but through a private, mar­ket-based ap­proach that is more pal­at­able to Re­pub­lic­ans. Arkan­sas led the way with its “private op­tion” plan, and oth­ers, such as Pennsylvania and In­di­ana, have fol­lowed suit.

The In­di­ana al­tern­at­ive — HIP 2.0 — would ex­pand on the ex­ist­ing state pro­gram, and in­clude three dif­fer­ent plan op­tions: HIP Link, HIP Plus, and HIP Ba­sic. All in­clude a Per­son­al Well­ness and Re­spons­ib­il­ity, or POWER, ac­count that is in­ten­ded to func­tion like a Health Sav­ings Ac­count; re­quire a con­tri­bu­tion from the pa­tient; and em­phas­ize pre­ven­tion, with a pen­alty for un­ne­ces­sary emer­gency-room use. They are in­ten­ded to be tem­por­ary plans, un­til con­sumers are able to work their way up to trans­ition in­to the private in­sur­ance mar­ket­place, Pence says.

HIP Link is a premi­um as­sist­ance pro­gram for people with ac­cess to em­ploy­er-based cov­er­age but who may not be able to af­ford the plans. HIP Plus is for in­di­vidu­als be­low 138 per­cent of the fed­er­al poverty level who make their POWER con­tri­bu­tions, while HIP Ba­sic is for those be­low 100 per­cent FPL who do not make their re­quired con­tri­bu­tions. HIP ba­sic in­cludes a less com­pre­hens­ive be­ne­fits pack­age and pre­scrip­tion-drug be­ne­fit. Those above 100 per­cent FPL risk los­ing their cov­er­age en­tirely if they don’t make their con­tri­bu­tion; those be­low 100 per­cent must make co-pays and re­ceive few­er be­ne­fits un­til they are able to con­trib­ute again.

Pence in­sists that his pro­posed ex­pan­sion of the Healthy In­di­ana Plan is not Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, and is not Obama­care. But he is seek­ing to pay for the pro­gram us­ing Obama­care dol­lars, even as he con­tin­ues to call for the law’s re­peal.

Of course, if Obama­care were re­pealed, Pence would not have the fund­ing he seeks to im­ple­ment HIP 2.0.

The In­di­ana pro­pos­al is cur­rently in the com­ment peri­od, and Pence plans to sub­mit the waiver ap­plic­a­tion to CMS some­time next month. The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will need to ap­prove the re­quest in or­der for the plan to move for­ward.

“We haven’t shaken hands on this deal yet,” Pence said. “But I’m hope­ful.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
22 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×