Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel made a quiet trip to Capitol Hill on Tuesday afternoon amid the growing scandal engulfing veterans affairs hospitals across the country.
Shinseki and Hagel were on the Hill for a meeting with House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers and Ranking Member Nita Lowey, according to a committee spokeswoman, that was scheduled some time ago and was not related to the VA scandal. The meeting, she said, was about the veterans affairs and defense departments’ ongoing collaboration involving electronic medical records. Both departments have yet to create the digital system prescribed by Congress in 2008, which continues to create headaches on the Hill.
Representatives of the House Armed Services and House Veterans’ Affairs committees that they were unaware of Shinseki’s visit. House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, who had said he wanted to look into scandal but has so far refrained from calling for Shinseki’s resignation, said it was the first he had heard of the veterans affairs secretary’s trip to the Hill.
The visit comes as a handful of congressional Republicans have called for Shinseki’s immediate resignation. The majority of members, including leadership, however, are withholding their judgment on the secretary’s employment until more information arises.
Shinseki has said he is “mad as hell” about long wait times and secret appointment lists at veterans’ hospitals. The Veterans Affairs Department’s inspector general is conducting an investigation into allegations of mismanagement at hospitals.
CLARIFICATION: An earlier version of this story referred to the secretaries’ trip to the Hill as a “surprise visit.” While the visit was in fact a surprise to members of the House Armed Services and House Veterans’ Affairs committees, it had been previously planned with leaders of the House Appropriations Committee.
What We're Following See More »
"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.
"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."
"The Interior Department’s internal watchdog has opened a formal investigation into a real estate deal involving a foundation established by Ryan Zinke and developers including Halliburton Chairman David Lesar, which was first reported by Politico, according to a letter sent to lawmakers Wednesday."
With preparations for the 2020 Census underway, President Trump has nominated a director of the agency. Steven Dillingham currently serves as director of the Office of Strategic Information, Research, and Planning at the Peace Corps. Previously, he served as Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Among his challenges will be navigating the thorny political issue of including a citizenship question on the survey.
"The California Supreme Court decided Wednesday to remove a measure aimed at dividing California into three states from the November ballot. In a brief order, the court said it acted because significant questions have been raised regarding the proposition’s validity and because we conclude that the potential harm in permitting the measure to remain on the ballot outweighs the potential harm in delaying the proposition to a future election.'”