House Prepares Vote on ‘Watered-Down’ NSA Reform Bill As Privacy Groups Drop Support

Ahead of a Thursday vote on the House floor, groups that once embraced the USA Freedom Act are now running from it.

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
May 20, 2014, 12:38 p.m.

Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates are quickly pulling their sup­port from a newly amended bill in­ten­ded to lim­it the gov­ern­ment’s mass col­lec­tion of Amer­ic­ans’ phone re­cords.

A new ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act was re­leased Tues­day, the cul­min­a­tion of more than a week of in­tense back­door ne­go­ti­ations among House lead­er­ship, the White House, and the in­tel­li­gence com­munity.

The House will vote on the meas­ure on Thursday, a spokes­man for Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor said. But back­ers of gov­ern­ment-sur­veil­lance re­form wasted no time con­demning the changes.

“House lead­ers should have al­lowed a vote on the com­prom­ise ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act that was already agreed to, rather than un­der­min­ing their own mem­bers and cav­ing in to the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s de­mands,” said Kev­in Bank­ston, the policy dir­ect­or of the New Amer­ica Found­a­tion’s Open Tech­no­logy In­sti­tute, in a state­ment. “We can­not in good con­science sup­port this weakened ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act, where key re­forms — es­pe­cially those in­ten­ded to end bulk col­lec­tion and in­crease trans­par­ency — have been sub­stan­tially watered down.”

Har­ley Gei­ger, a seni­or coun­sel at the Cen­ter for Demo­cracy & Tech­no­logy, said his group was also with­draw­ing its sup­port for the bill due to its loose defin­i­tion of a “spe­cif­ic se­lec­tion term,” which provides a basis for how nar­rowly in­tel­li­gence agen­cies would be re­quired to define se­lec­ted tar­gets when con­duct­ing a search of phone re­cords.

The new lan­guage “might lim­it na­tion­wide sur­veil­lance, but does not clearly lim­it this au­thor­ity for area codes or cit­ies,” Gei­ger said. “It would provide for an un­ac­cept­able level of sur­veil­lance in a bill that is sup­posed to re­form broad gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance.”

Oth­er back­ers of sur­veil­lance re­form took to Twit­ter to ex­press sim­il­ar frus­tra­tion. The flurry of with­draw­als “mir­ror law­makers’ grow­ing con­cerns” about the bill, a spokes­man for Rep. Zoe Lof­gren, a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat, said.

The com­prom­ise fur­ther moves the goal­posts on cer­tain pri­vacy and trans­par­ency meas­ures to­ward what na­tion­al se­cur­ity hawks wanted, even after they scored sev­er­al con­ces­sions earli­er this month when an amended bill passed out of the House Ju­di­ciary and In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees.

The bill, au­thored by Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, still would not al­low bulk, lim­it­less col­lec­tion of all phone metadata — the num­bers and time stamps of a call but not its con­tents — but its defin­i­tion of when gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials are al­lowed to search those re­cords has been widened from earli­er agreed-upon lan­guage, ad­voc­ates say. In ad­di­tion, a trans­par­ency pro­vi­sion that spe­cifies how much tech com­pan­ies can dis­close about the gov­ern­ment’s re­quests of user data falls short of what many had hoped. 

The amended Free­dom Act, which was also filed by Sensen­bren­ner, is slated for con­sid­er­a­tion in the Rules Com­mit­tee on Tues­day af­ter­noon. Sources on and off Cap­it­ol Hill said they were skep­tic­al the vote would al­low an open-amend­ment de­bate.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×