Privacy advocates are quickly pulling their support from a newly amended bill intended to limit the government’s mass collection of Americans’ phone records.
A new version of the USA Freedom Act was released Tuesday, the culmination of more than a week of intense backdoor negotiations among House leadership, the White House, and the intelligence community.
The House will vote on the measure on Thursday, a spokesman for Majority Leader Eric Cantor said. But backers of government-surveillance reform wasted no time condemning the changes.
“House leaders should have allowed a vote on the compromise version of the USA Freedom Act that was already agreed to, rather than undermining their own members and caving in to the intelligence community’s demands,” said Kevin Bankston, the policy director of the New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, in a statement. “We cannot in good conscience support this weakened version of the USA Freedom Act, where key reforms — especially those intended to end bulk collection and increase transparency — have been substantially watered down.”
Harley Geiger, a senior counsel at the Center for Democracy & Technology, said his group was also withdrawing its support for the bill due to its loose definition of a “specific selection term,” which provides a basis for how narrowly intelligence agencies would be required to define selected targets when conducting a search of phone records.
The new language “might limit nationwide surveillance, but does not clearly limit this authority for area codes or cities,” Geiger said. “It would provide for an unacceptable level of surveillance in a bill that is supposed to reform broad government surveillance.”
Other backers of surveillance reform took to Twitter to express similar frustration. The flurry of withdrawals “mirror lawmakers’ growing concerns” about the bill, a spokesman for Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, said.
The compromise further moves the goalposts on certain privacy and transparency measures toward what national security hawks wanted, even after they scored several concessions earlier this month when an amended bill passed out of the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees.
The bill, authored by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, still would not allow bulk, limitless collection of all phone metadata — the numbers and time stamps of a call but not its contents — but its definition of when government officials are allowed to search those records has been widened from earlier agreed-upon language, advocates say. In addition, a transparency provision that specifies how much tech companies can disclose about the government’s requests of user data falls short of what many had hoped.
The amended Freedom Act, which was also filed by Sensenbrenner, is slated for consideration in the Rules Committee on Tuesday afternoon. Sources on and off Capitol Hill said they were skeptical the vote would allow an open-amendment debate.
What We're Following See More »
"Congress is considering attaching a narrow background check bill for gun purchases to a must-pass government funding package before the end of the week, when thousands of high school students are expected to congregate in Washington for the March to End Gun Violence. Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) on Tuesday said leadership was talking to its members about adding the background legislation, even as news broke of a new school shooting on Tuesday morning in Maryland."
"The House likely will not vote until Thursday on an omnibus spending bill, according to numerous lawmakers who attended a GOP conference meeting this morning. Some two dozen issues are still outstanding, members were told. The $1.3 trillion fiscal 2018 measure must be passed before government funding runs out Friday."
"President Trump is preparing to impose a package of $60 billion in annual tariffs against China, following through on a long-time threat that he says will punish China for intellectual property infringement and create more American jobs. The tariff package, which Trump plans to unveil by Friday, was confirmed by four senior administration officials. Senior aides had presented Trump with a $30 billion tariff package that would apply to a range of products, but Trump directed them to roughly double the scope of the new trade levies."
"President Trump’s attorneys have provided the special counsel’s office with written descriptions that chronicle key moments under investigation in hopes of curtailing the scope of a presidential interview, according to two people familiar with the situation. Trump’s legal team recently shared the documents in an effort to limit any session between the president and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to a few select topics" on order to "minimize his exposure. ... The lawyers are worried that Trump, who has a penchant for making erroneous claims, would be vulnerable in an hours-long interview."
White House Lawyer Ty Cobb said that President Trump not considering firing special counsel Robert Mueller. Speculation swirled after Trump attacked the investigation on Twitter, and called out Mueller directly for the first time. “In response to media speculation and related questions being posed to the Administration," Cobb said, "...the President is not considering or discussing the firing of the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Several members of Congress, "including some top Republicans, warned Trump to not even think about terminating Mueller."